Can a Mimic (container form) actually hold loot?How do current D&D 4e DMs deal with loot?Mimic's...
GPL code private and stolen
Are Wave equations equivalent to Maxwell equations in free space?
Practical reasons to have both a large police force and bounty hunting network?
Can a Tiny Servant be used as a messenger?
Where is this quote about overcoming the impossible said in "Interstellar"?
Are small insurances worth it
Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?
How to concatenate two command in shell
How do you write a macro that takes arguments containing paragraphs?
Why are special aircraft used for the carriers in the United States Navy?
Adding thousand separator to various number types
Should I use HTTPS on a domain that will only be used for redirection?
How spaceships determine each other mass in space?
Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?
Why won't the strings command stop?
Faulty RAID1 disk now shows as foreign
How to close up the table border in a multi-row situation?
Is there a way to find out the age of climbing ropes?
How do you make a gun that shoots melee weapons and/or swords?
Caulking a corner instead of taping with joint compound?
I've given my players a lot of magic items. Is it reasonable for me to give them harder encounters?
Deal the cards to the players
Number of folds to form a cube, using a square paper?
Can a Mexican citizen living in US under DACA drive to Canada?
Can a Mimic (container form) actually hold loot?
How do current D&D 4e DMs deal with loot?Mimic's adhesiveHow can I balance loot distribution for my players?Can a Mimic mimic another creature?How can I determine how much of the loot the PCs find?Could a Mimic mimic a Simulacrum?Guidelines for speeding up looting process for player characters?How to handle loot disputes as the DM?Is it common practice in 3.5/Pathfinder to give players loot they can use as gear?At what level can a party fight a mimic?
$begingroup$
I want my players to be able to kill a Mimic and get the loot from the Mimic's corpse.
The Mimic has an acidic bite, and is a creature, not actually a container.
Can a Mimic store items?
dnd-5e monsters treasure mimic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want my players to be able to kill a Mimic and get the loot from the Mimic's corpse.
The Mimic has an acidic bite, and is a creature, not actually a container.
Can a Mimic store items?
dnd-5e monsters treasure mimic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want my players to be able to kill a Mimic and get the loot from the Mimic's corpse.
The Mimic has an acidic bite, and is a creature, not actually a container.
Can a Mimic store items?
dnd-5e monsters treasure mimic
$endgroup$
I want my players to be able to kill a Mimic and get the loot from the Mimic's corpse.
The Mimic has an acidic bite, and is a creature, not actually a container.
Can a Mimic store items?
dnd-5e monsters treasure mimic
dnd-5e monsters treasure mimic
asked 1 hour ago
goodguy5goodguy5
8,98623173
8,98623173
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Probably not
Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:
The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.
It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)
However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.
Storing items inside creatures
I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.
The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):
The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.
If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.
I think the monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there.
There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
53 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
"common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
52 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I didn't think I we were allowed to copy and paste lore out of the copyrighted sections of the books. The roper lore would qualify.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
21 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
20 mins ago
$begingroup$
@kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
19 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a container, no.
When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM
A roper can digest anything it eats with the
exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic
items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the
creature's gizzard after death. A roper's digestive juices
are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists
who use them as a solvent.
Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM.
When a purple worm burrows
through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which
it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals
and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple
worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and
foolhardy treasure hunters.
So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142663%2fcan-a-mimic-container-form-actually-hold-loot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Probably not
Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:
The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.
It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)
However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.
Storing items inside creatures
I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.
The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):
The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.
If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Probably not
Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:
The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.
It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)
However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.
Storing items inside creatures
I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.
The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):
The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.
If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Probably not
Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:
The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.
It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)
However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.
Storing items inside creatures
I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.
The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):
The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.
If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)
$endgroup$
Probably not
Because the mimic has the always on property of Adhesive when in object form:
The mimic adheres to anything that touches it.
It seems unlikely that someone was able to get something inside of it. Once it moves, it's no longer the object and is instead it's true form. And I'd saying that it opening is it moving (because it's moving.)
However, should whomever is using it want to store something inside it (cruel!), I'm not sure that would be totally against the rules.
Storing items inside creatures
I guess technically it can 'contain' the item - but the players are going to have to 'dig' for it.
The mimic is only an object when it's using it's shapechanger ability (my emphasis):
The mimic can use its action to polymorph into an object or back into its true, amorphous form. Its statistics are the same in each form. Any equipment it is wearing or carrying isn't transformed. It reverts to its true form if it dies.
If they've killed it, then it's no longer acting as the 'container', but I don't see why it can't still have something inside it (heck, any monster could have items implanted, I guess.)
answered 1 hour ago
NautArchNautArch
58.7k8210391
58.7k8210391
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.
I think the monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there.
There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
53 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
"common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
52 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I didn't think I we were allowed to copy and paste lore out of the copyrighted sections of the books. The roper lore would qualify.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
21 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
20 mins ago
$begingroup$
@kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
19 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.
I think the monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there.
There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
53 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
"common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
52 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I didn't think I we were allowed to copy and paste lore out of the copyrighted sections of the books. The roper lore would qualify.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
21 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
20 mins ago
$begingroup$
@kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
19 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.
I think the monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there.
There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.
$endgroup$
It's fairly common in published adventures for e.g. a roper to have loot in its gizzard. It occurs multiple times in Tales from the Yawning Portal.
I think the monster's manual even suggests treasure winds up there.
There's no reason your mimic couldn't have something similar, though I suppose it's not really explicitly spelled out as a common mimic characteristic.
edited 23 mins ago
answered 58 mins ago
kyle sextonkyle sexton
1552
1552
$begingroup$
Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
53 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
"common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
52 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I didn't think I we were allowed to copy and paste lore out of the copyrighted sections of the books. The roper lore would qualify.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
21 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
20 mins ago
$begingroup$
@kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
19 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
53 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
"common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
52 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I didn't think I we were allowed to copy and paste lore out of the copyrighted sections of the books. The roper lore would qualify.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
21 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
20 mins ago
$begingroup$
@kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
19 mins ago
$begingroup$
Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
Purely out of morbid curiosity - can you a cite a published adventure that has that? And do players have to specifically say they're searching inside it?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
53 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
"common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
52 mins ago
$begingroup$
"common in published adventures", "the monster's manual even suggests" your answer would be much more convincing if you found examples and provided some or citations to back up these claims. It is important that answers are backed up properly as we require on this site.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
52 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I didn't think I we were allowed to copy and paste lore out of the copyrighted sections of the books. The roper lore would qualify.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
21 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I didn't think I we were allowed to copy and paste lore out of the copyrighted sections of the books. The roper lore would qualify.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
21 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
20 mins ago
$begingroup$
@NautArch It happens a few times in Tales from the Yawning Portal. Players do have to explicitly state that they're searching the gizzard.
$endgroup$
– kyle sexton
20 mins ago
$begingroup$
@kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
19 mins ago
$begingroup$
@kylesexton Actually, we are allowed to do so. If you post sections of sources (not like the whole thing obviously) here that is well within the norm here and is perfectly fine. In fact, doing so is encouraged. Again not the whole thing, but just whatever part is needed to make your point.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
19 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a container, no.
When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM
A roper can digest anything it eats with the
exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic
items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the
creature's gizzard after death. A roper's digestive juices
are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists
who use them as a solvent.
Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM.
When a purple worm burrows
through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which
it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals
and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple
worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and
foolhardy treasure hunters.
So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a container, no.
When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM
A roper can digest anything it eats with the
exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic
items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the
creature's gizzard after death. A roper's digestive juices
are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists
who use them as a solvent.
Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM.
When a purple worm burrows
through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which
it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals
and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple
worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and
foolhardy treasure hunters.
So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a container, no.
When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM
A roper can digest anything it eats with the
exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic
items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the
creature's gizzard after death. A roper's digestive juices
are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists
who use them as a solvent.
Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM.
When a purple worm burrows
through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which
it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals
and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple
worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and
foolhardy treasure hunters.
So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?
$endgroup$
As a container, no.
When the mimic dies, it reverts into it's true shape, which is not a container which would normally contain loot. It could have eaten something like an enchanted ring by mistake or something while feasting on the poor adventurer before you, but otherwise, I think it would be on the outside of the Mimic due to its Adhesive property. Now, other monsters do have the ability to have loot inside them, as @kyle sexton has said, like the Roper, which is actually stated in the MM
A roper can digest anything it eats with the
exception of platinum, gemstones, and magic
items, which can sometimes be retrieved from the
creature's gizzard after death. A roper's digestive juices
are also valuable, fetching a high price from alchemists
who use them as a solvent.
Then you have the Purple Worm which eats through the earth, and can have gems and the like inside its stomach, which is also referenced in the MM.
When a purple worm burrows
through the ground, it consumes earth and rock, which
it breaks down and constantly excretes. Precious metals
and gems can thus be found within the bodies of purple
worms, which are targeted by particularly brave and
foolhardy treasure hunters.
So... For the mimic, I would think not, but as DM, you could rule it so. Other monsters consume things that they cannot digest and you can loot them for it, so why not the mimic?
answered 27 mins ago
BookwyrmBookwyrm
207210
207210
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142663%2fcan-a-mimic-container-form-actually-hold-loot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown