How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?Does my poem...

PTIJ: Aliyot for the deceased

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

3.5% Interest Student Loan or use all of my savings on Tuition?

I've given my players a lot of magic items. Is it reasonable for me to give them harder encounters?

Quitting employee has privileged access to critical information

Caulking a corner instead of taping with joint compound?

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

How can you calculate the inverse of signature S, while you cannot do it in ECC to calculate private key from public key?

Estimating the efficiency of a shortened (loaded) antenna

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

ESPP--any reason not to go all in?

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?

Affine transformation of circular arc in 3D

I can't die. Who am I?

How will Occam's Razor principle work in Machine learning

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Why do we see a rainbow of colors reflected off a CD or DVD?

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?

Does it cost more to counter Sphinx of New Prahv?

What is the purpose of a disclaimer like "this is not legal advice"?

Why aren't there more gauls like Obelix?

Can a Mexican citizen living in US under DACA drive to Canada?



How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?


Does my poem convey the character of the (fictional) author well?Variation in humor among ethnic/cultural groupsShould I highlight or downplay a character's quirk to make her seem more odd?Handling an Inauthentic CharacterWill changing a protagonist into an antagonist alienate readers?Advice on portraying my protagonist's anger without making her insufferableHow to portray a passively arrogant character?Right approach to introduce a character on a scriptHow do I prevent my protagonist from ending the world?Protagonist who is morally compromised and antagonist who is “good”?













1















I've come across a problem with one of the main characters in my book. The "heroine" of my story starts out as an apathetic self-absorbed hacker, who seeks adrenaline thrills to find meaning in her life. With that in mind, I tried to show this kind of outlook is not evil, but neutral instead (the theory that all humans are self-interested). To make a point that she's not evil, I've shown that she refuses to cause physical harm to anyone, and won't work with a hacker organization that kills people. At the same time though, she didn't care about their agenda to expose a company that exploited child workers, because it doesn't affect her at all.



Here's a little exchange she has with another hacker, whom she helped to expose a corrupt organization (The MC is Joyce, aka Banshee_Harvest)




Banshee_Harvest: The infiltration went without a hitch, I managed to copy their entire database onto my hard drive. I’ve sifted through the code too, you were right. They were exploiting children for labor.

G00fy: That’s what I thought. I’m impressed Banshee, the TLF were ready to sift through that code with you. I’m glad that it ended up being so easy. It’s just another domino in the effort to free the people of these corrupt corporate executives.

Banshee_Harvest: Save your preaching for someone who actually cares. I was in this solely for the thrills. I’m uploading the files now #2_files_attached (New_labor_contract.pdf, Redacted_labor_contract_CONFIDENTIAL.pdf)

Banshee_Harvest: I’ll send the rest of the content if you’d like that, but I think that’ll be enough.

G00fy: Aren’t you the one who is always complaining that they need a cause to join? What’s so bad about the TLF?


Joyce swiveled in her chair, tucking her legs in, remembering the uneasiness she felt earlier.


Banshee_Harvest: I don’t like the rumors about you guys. You’re not afraid to hurt people to get what you want. And I don’t want to end up on that side of the fence. The ends don’t always justify the means.

G00fy: Lol, yet here you are, working as one of the most profitable hackers in the country, if not the world.

Banshee_Harvest: I don’t throw people under the bus to get what I need. You do.

G00fy: Listen, we do what we have to, no more, no less. The sacrifice of the few, or the one is for the good of the many, am I right?

Banshee_Harvest: Don’t try to push your fascist beliefs on me, I’ve heard about what you’ve guys done.

G00fy: We’re only trying to help. And I do mean that.


Joyce sighed in frustration. G00fy could be annoying at times. She didn’t want to join them. This was a one-time thing, and she meant it.


Banshee_Harvest: As I’ve told you many times before, NOT INTERESTED!

G00fy: Okay, you don’t have to shout. Thanks for your help, btw.

Banshee_Harvest: Np. However, there is the matter of paying me still. I think I should negotiate my price considering all that I was able to do, don’t you agree?

G00fy: I’ll have to talk with the other members about that, but you did agree to a 25 bitcoin price, which is a fair sum of money.

Banshee_Harvest: But I think, with all that I’ve done here, I do deserve a 5 bitcoin bonus, don’t you agree?

G00fy: That’s pretty hefty, like more than I can vouch for at least. Like I said, I’ll have to talk to the others about this. Thanks for your help though. The 25 should have already been sent to your account.




One of my reader's described Joyce (Banshee_Harvest) like this, "I'm hating Joyce right now. Her character is contradictory. She's selfish and a criminal. And she deserves to be in jail. Plus she's apathetic and arrogant and I don't see any redeeming qualities to her. So if I'm supposed to feel this way, you've succeeded. But I don't think I want to live with her as the protagonist of this book. I'll just want to keep shooting her in the head."



The purpose of this novel is to show her transformation from someone who is chaotic neutral to lawful good. However, I can't begin that transformation if my readers hate my character. How can I portray a chaotic neutral character as sympathetic and avoid making them seem evil? Or how can I make a selfish character relatable?



I understand that morals can be ambiguous, but it's important that my readers can at least relate to this character so they give her a chance. However, my character is really self-absorbed (she really doesn't have anything driving her other than thrill and money: at least at first.)










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    As a general comment, this question comes close to "What to Write" but I think we can keep it general enough to be applicable. Please keep that in mind in your answers.

    – Lauren Ipsum
    2 hours ago
















1















I've come across a problem with one of the main characters in my book. The "heroine" of my story starts out as an apathetic self-absorbed hacker, who seeks adrenaline thrills to find meaning in her life. With that in mind, I tried to show this kind of outlook is not evil, but neutral instead (the theory that all humans are self-interested). To make a point that she's not evil, I've shown that she refuses to cause physical harm to anyone, and won't work with a hacker organization that kills people. At the same time though, she didn't care about their agenda to expose a company that exploited child workers, because it doesn't affect her at all.



Here's a little exchange she has with another hacker, whom she helped to expose a corrupt organization (The MC is Joyce, aka Banshee_Harvest)




Banshee_Harvest: The infiltration went without a hitch, I managed to copy their entire database onto my hard drive. I’ve sifted through the code too, you were right. They were exploiting children for labor.

G00fy: That’s what I thought. I’m impressed Banshee, the TLF were ready to sift through that code with you. I’m glad that it ended up being so easy. It’s just another domino in the effort to free the people of these corrupt corporate executives.

Banshee_Harvest: Save your preaching for someone who actually cares. I was in this solely for the thrills. I’m uploading the files now #2_files_attached (New_labor_contract.pdf, Redacted_labor_contract_CONFIDENTIAL.pdf)

Banshee_Harvest: I’ll send the rest of the content if you’d like that, but I think that’ll be enough.

G00fy: Aren’t you the one who is always complaining that they need a cause to join? What’s so bad about the TLF?


Joyce swiveled in her chair, tucking her legs in, remembering the uneasiness she felt earlier.


Banshee_Harvest: I don’t like the rumors about you guys. You’re not afraid to hurt people to get what you want. And I don’t want to end up on that side of the fence. The ends don’t always justify the means.

G00fy: Lol, yet here you are, working as one of the most profitable hackers in the country, if not the world.

Banshee_Harvest: I don’t throw people under the bus to get what I need. You do.

G00fy: Listen, we do what we have to, no more, no less. The sacrifice of the few, or the one is for the good of the many, am I right?

Banshee_Harvest: Don’t try to push your fascist beliefs on me, I’ve heard about what you’ve guys done.

G00fy: We’re only trying to help. And I do mean that.


Joyce sighed in frustration. G00fy could be annoying at times. She didn’t want to join them. This was a one-time thing, and she meant it.


Banshee_Harvest: As I’ve told you many times before, NOT INTERESTED!

G00fy: Okay, you don’t have to shout. Thanks for your help, btw.

Banshee_Harvest: Np. However, there is the matter of paying me still. I think I should negotiate my price considering all that I was able to do, don’t you agree?

G00fy: I’ll have to talk with the other members about that, but you did agree to a 25 bitcoin price, which is a fair sum of money.

Banshee_Harvest: But I think, with all that I’ve done here, I do deserve a 5 bitcoin bonus, don’t you agree?

G00fy: That’s pretty hefty, like more than I can vouch for at least. Like I said, I’ll have to talk to the others about this. Thanks for your help though. The 25 should have already been sent to your account.




One of my reader's described Joyce (Banshee_Harvest) like this, "I'm hating Joyce right now. Her character is contradictory. She's selfish and a criminal. And she deserves to be in jail. Plus she's apathetic and arrogant and I don't see any redeeming qualities to her. So if I'm supposed to feel this way, you've succeeded. But I don't think I want to live with her as the protagonist of this book. I'll just want to keep shooting her in the head."



The purpose of this novel is to show her transformation from someone who is chaotic neutral to lawful good. However, I can't begin that transformation if my readers hate my character. How can I portray a chaotic neutral character as sympathetic and avoid making them seem evil? Or how can I make a selfish character relatable?



I understand that morals can be ambiguous, but it's important that my readers can at least relate to this character so they give her a chance. However, my character is really self-absorbed (she really doesn't have anything driving her other than thrill and money: at least at first.)










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    As a general comment, this question comes close to "What to Write" but I think we can keep it general enough to be applicable. Please keep that in mind in your answers.

    – Lauren Ipsum
    2 hours ago














1












1








1








I've come across a problem with one of the main characters in my book. The "heroine" of my story starts out as an apathetic self-absorbed hacker, who seeks adrenaline thrills to find meaning in her life. With that in mind, I tried to show this kind of outlook is not evil, but neutral instead (the theory that all humans are self-interested). To make a point that she's not evil, I've shown that she refuses to cause physical harm to anyone, and won't work with a hacker organization that kills people. At the same time though, she didn't care about their agenda to expose a company that exploited child workers, because it doesn't affect her at all.



Here's a little exchange she has with another hacker, whom she helped to expose a corrupt organization (The MC is Joyce, aka Banshee_Harvest)




Banshee_Harvest: The infiltration went without a hitch, I managed to copy their entire database onto my hard drive. I’ve sifted through the code too, you were right. They were exploiting children for labor.

G00fy: That’s what I thought. I’m impressed Banshee, the TLF were ready to sift through that code with you. I’m glad that it ended up being so easy. It’s just another domino in the effort to free the people of these corrupt corporate executives.

Banshee_Harvest: Save your preaching for someone who actually cares. I was in this solely for the thrills. I’m uploading the files now #2_files_attached (New_labor_contract.pdf, Redacted_labor_contract_CONFIDENTIAL.pdf)

Banshee_Harvest: I’ll send the rest of the content if you’d like that, but I think that’ll be enough.

G00fy: Aren’t you the one who is always complaining that they need a cause to join? What’s so bad about the TLF?


Joyce swiveled in her chair, tucking her legs in, remembering the uneasiness she felt earlier.


Banshee_Harvest: I don’t like the rumors about you guys. You’re not afraid to hurt people to get what you want. And I don’t want to end up on that side of the fence. The ends don’t always justify the means.

G00fy: Lol, yet here you are, working as one of the most profitable hackers in the country, if not the world.

Banshee_Harvest: I don’t throw people under the bus to get what I need. You do.

G00fy: Listen, we do what we have to, no more, no less. The sacrifice of the few, or the one is for the good of the many, am I right?

Banshee_Harvest: Don’t try to push your fascist beliefs on me, I’ve heard about what you’ve guys done.

G00fy: We’re only trying to help. And I do mean that.


Joyce sighed in frustration. G00fy could be annoying at times. She didn’t want to join them. This was a one-time thing, and she meant it.


Banshee_Harvest: As I’ve told you many times before, NOT INTERESTED!

G00fy: Okay, you don’t have to shout. Thanks for your help, btw.

Banshee_Harvest: Np. However, there is the matter of paying me still. I think I should negotiate my price considering all that I was able to do, don’t you agree?

G00fy: I’ll have to talk with the other members about that, but you did agree to a 25 bitcoin price, which is a fair sum of money.

Banshee_Harvest: But I think, with all that I’ve done here, I do deserve a 5 bitcoin bonus, don’t you agree?

G00fy: That’s pretty hefty, like more than I can vouch for at least. Like I said, I’ll have to talk to the others about this. Thanks for your help though. The 25 should have already been sent to your account.




One of my reader's described Joyce (Banshee_Harvest) like this, "I'm hating Joyce right now. Her character is contradictory. She's selfish and a criminal. And she deserves to be in jail. Plus she's apathetic and arrogant and I don't see any redeeming qualities to her. So if I'm supposed to feel this way, you've succeeded. But I don't think I want to live with her as the protagonist of this book. I'll just want to keep shooting her in the head."



The purpose of this novel is to show her transformation from someone who is chaotic neutral to lawful good. However, I can't begin that transformation if my readers hate my character. How can I portray a chaotic neutral character as sympathetic and avoid making them seem evil? Or how can I make a selfish character relatable?



I understand that morals can be ambiguous, but it's important that my readers can at least relate to this character so they give her a chance. However, my character is really self-absorbed (she really doesn't have anything driving her other than thrill and money: at least at first.)










share|improve this question














I've come across a problem with one of the main characters in my book. The "heroine" of my story starts out as an apathetic self-absorbed hacker, who seeks adrenaline thrills to find meaning in her life. With that in mind, I tried to show this kind of outlook is not evil, but neutral instead (the theory that all humans are self-interested). To make a point that she's not evil, I've shown that she refuses to cause physical harm to anyone, and won't work with a hacker organization that kills people. At the same time though, she didn't care about their agenda to expose a company that exploited child workers, because it doesn't affect her at all.



Here's a little exchange she has with another hacker, whom she helped to expose a corrupt organization (The MC is Joyce, aka Banshee_Harvest)




Banshee_Harvest: The infiltration went without a hitch, I managed to copy their entire database onto my hard drive. I’ve sifted through the code too, you were right. They were exploiting children for labor.

G00fy: That’s what I thought. I’m impressed Banshee, the TLF were ready to sift through that code with you. I’m glad that it ended up being so easy. It’s just another domino in the effort to free the people of these corrupt corporate executives.

Banshee_Harvest: Save your preaching for someone who actually cares. I was in this solely for the thrills. I’m uploading the files now #2_files_attached (New_labor_contract.pdf, Redacted_labor_contract_CONFIDENTIAL.pdf)

Banshee_Harvest: I’ll send the rest of the content if you’d like that, but I think that’ll be enough.

G00fy: Aren’t you the one who is always complaining that they need a cause to join? What’s so bad about the TLF?


Joyce swiveled in her chair, tucking her legs in, remembering the uneasiness she felt earlier.


Banshee_Harvest: I don’t like the rumors about you guys. You’re not afraid to hurt people to get what you want. And I don’t want to end up on that side of the fence. The ends don’t always justify the means.

G00fy: Lol, yet here you are, working as one of the most profitable hackers in the country, if not the world.

Banshee_Harvest: I don’t throw people under the bus to get what I need. You do.

G00fy: Listen, we do what we have to, no more, no less. The sacrifice of the few, or the one is for the good of the many, am I right?

Banshee_Harvest: Don’t try to push your fascist beliefs on me, I’ve heard about what you’ve guys done.

G00fy: We’re only trying to help. And I do mean that.


Joyce sighed in frustration. G00fy could be annoying at times. She didn’t want to join them. This was a one-time thing, and she meant it.


Banshee_Harvest: As I’ve told you many times before, NOT INTERESTED!

G00fy: Okay, you don’t have to shout. Thanks for your help, btw.

Banshee_Harvest: Np. However, there is the matter of paying me still. I think I should negotiate my price considering all that I was able to do, don’t you agree?

G00fy: I’ll have to talk with the other members about that, but you did agree to a 25 bitcoin price, which is a fair sum of money.

Banshee_Harvest: But I think, with all that I’ve done here, I do deserve a 5 bitcoin bonus, don’t you agree?

G00fy: That’s pretty hefty, like more than I can vouch for at least. Like I said, I’ll have to talk to the others about this. Thanks for your help though. The 25 should have already been sent to your account.




One of my reader's described Joyce (Banshee_Harvest) like this, "I'm hating Joyce right now. Her character is contradictory. She's selfish and a criminal. And she deserves to be in jail. Plus she's apathetic and arrogant and I don't see any redeeming qualities to her. So if I'm supposed to feel this way, you've succeeded. But I don't think I want to live with her as the protagonist of this book. I'll just want to keep shooting her in the head."



The purpose of this novel is to show her transformation from someone who is chaotic neutral to lawful good. However, I can't begin that transformation if my readers hate my character. How can I portray a chaotic neutral character as sympathetic and avoid making them seem evil? Or how can I make a selfish character relatable?



I understand that morals can be ambiguous, but it's important that my readers can at least relate to this character so they give her a chance. However, my character is really self-absorbed (she really doesn't have anything driving her other than thrill and money: at least at first.)







characters character-development morality






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









Joe-You-KnowJoe-You-Know

1436




1436








  • 2





    As a general comment, this question comes close to "What to Write" but I think we can keep it general enough to be applicable. Please keep that in mind in your answers.

    – Lauren Ipsum
    2 hours ago














  • 2





    As a general comment, this question comes close to "What to Write" but I think we can keep it general enough to be applicable. Please keep that in mind in your answers.

    – Lauren Ipsum
    2 hours ago








2




2





As a general comment, this question comes close to "What to Write" but I think we can keep it general enough to be applicable. Please keep that in mind in your answers.

– Lauren Ipsum
2 hours ago





As a general comment, this question comes close to "What to Write" but I think we can keep it general enough to be applicable. Please keep that in mind in your answers.

– Lauren Ipsum
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














I found a very elegant reduction of alignments in a Tumblr post:




I figured out a simple guide to the alignment chart last night:


Lawful: Rules matter more to me than individuals.


Chaotic: Individuals matter more to me than rules.


Good: Other people’s well-being is more important than my own.


Evil: My own well-being is more important than other people’s.


Neutrals: My opinion of what is more important is determined on a case-by-case basis.


So a Lawful Good character’s guiding moral philosophy might be “I follow the rules because the rules keep people safe, even if they are sometimes inconvenient or harmful to me or other individuals.” A Chaotic Evil character’s guiding moral philosophy would be like “Screw the rules and screw you.”


If Joyce is Chaotic, she's concerned with individuals more than corporations (so she won't kill, because that would harm an individual). If she's Neutral, then sometimes she will decide that people are worth helping, and sometimes she won't.



If you want to show her as Neutral rather than Evil, then you need a Pet the Dog moment. (TV Tropes warning!) You need to show that she is in the middle of the Good-Evil spectrum, and that she is capable of doing good things if it interests her. Ignoring child labor shoves her towards Evil, so I see your beta's point. There's a difference between self-interest and self-absorption. "I don't have to do anything about child labor because I don't know the kids" is not Neutral, it's Asshole.



The journey from Neutral to Good is not a long one. But going from Chaotic Good (I will help other people, regardless of the rules) to Lawful Good (I will help other people as long as I can follow the rules to do so, and I won't break the rules to help people) is honestly the bigger challenge here. How do you get Joyce from "screw you, I do what I want" to "I can't stop GlobalMegaCorp from using child labor because it operates in Backwardsia, where there are no laws against it"?



If you want your Leeeeeeeroy Jenkins! protagonist to be appealing, you have to make her appealing. She has to do things we like, or find fun, or could sympathize with. A selfish character can still be "not a jerk" if the character is capable of not being selfish all the time.



Loki is a Chaotic Neutral who repeatedly swings from Evil to Good. Captain Jack Sparrow is a Chaotic Neutral who isn't as Evil as he pretends to be. Petyr Baelish is a Chaotic Evil who pretends to be Good. None of them could suffer to be Lawful.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Great answer! I knew I was forgetting something. I think you're right in suggesting that she needs an appealing side, otherwise she just comes across as a jerk.

    – Joe-You-Know
    2 hours ago



















2














First, love your character. If you don’t, why should the readers care? Make her more than just this skill she has - make her who she is rather than what she does.



I have a hacker character who is a charming neutral, but assists assassins in a professional capacity. Most of what he does is what one might expect, but he takes joy in the challenge of checking a company’s security. He does other things, but has become the go-to if you need information that cannot be obtained otherwise.



I started with him as just some semi-anonymous person on the dark-net. That lasted about five minutes as he developed into an interesting charismatic person.



Joyce has a line she won’t cross, but acts as she does - why? Is she, like my hacker, intensely curious and striving to always improve his skills? Apathy is dangerous, self-absorbtion can be irksome.



Give her a reason why she became Banshee. Who was she when she was just Joyce? She is trying to do some good by exposing this corporation, but why? The bitcoin? Or does she care, even if she doesn’t really know it herself?



Does she perform this service because she believes, even subconsciously, in something? Is she a pure mercenary? Or does she charge what she does as a way of both justifying it to herself and fining those who have gone too far, who have no boundaries that she can see?






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    I like this. Having her show more confliction and hesitation would help her be more believable especially when she starts to transition to a good person. She thinks she doesn't care, but she does a little. I think showing that a bit could help her out. Bottom line is, she acts the way she does because she's trying to find something to care about.

    – Joe-You-Know
    2 hours ago



















0















Banshee_Harvest: Save your preaching for someone who actually cares. I was in this solely for the thrills.




That response is quite extreme. Neutral would be more like:




Banshee_Harvest: No worries. It was fun.




The focus is still on the wrong thing, i.e. The fun.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user37107 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "166"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43138%2fhow-to-write-a-chaotic-neutral-protagonist-and-prevent-my-readers-from-thinking%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    I found a very elegant reduction of alignments in a Tumblr post:




    I figured out a simple guide to the alignment chart last night:


    Lawful: Rules matter more to me than individuals.


    Chaotic: Individuals matter more to me than rules.


    Good: Other people’s well-being is more important than my own.

    
Evil: My own well-being is more important than other people’s.


    Neutrals: My opinion of what is more important is determined on a case-by-case basis.


    So a Lawful Good character’s guiding moral philosophy might be “I follow the rules because the rules keep people safe, even if they are sometimes inconvenient or harmful to me or other individuals.” A Chaotic Evil character’s guiding moral philosophy would be like “Screw the rules and screw you.”


    If Joyce is Chaotic, she's concerned with individuals more than corporations (so she won't kill, because that would harm an individual). If she's Neutral, then sometimes she will decide that people are worth helping, and sometimes she won't.



    If you want to show her as Neutral rather than Evil, then you need a Pet the Dog moment. (TV Tropes warning!) You need to show that she is in the middle of the Good-Evil spectrum, and that she is capable of doing good things if it interests her. Ignoring child labor shoves her towards Evil, so I see your beta's point. There's a difference between self-interest and self-absorption. "I don't have to do anything about child labor because I don't know the kids" is not Neutral, it's Asshole.



    The journey from Neutral to Good is not a long one. But going from Chaotic Good (I will help other people, regardless of the rules) to Lawful Good (I will help other people as long as I can follow the rules to do so, and I won't break the rules to help people) is honestly the bigger challenge here. How do you get Joyce from "screw you, I do what I want" to "I can't stop GlobalMegaCorp from using child labor because it operates in Backwardsia, where there are no laws against it"?



    If you want your Leeeeeeeroy Jenkins! protagonist to be appealing, you have to make her appealing. She has to do things we like, or find fun, or could sympathize with. A selfish character can still be "not a jerk" if the character is capable of not being selfish all the time.



    Loki is a Chaotic Neutral who repeatedly swings from Evil to Good. Captain Jack Sparrow is a Chaotic Neutral who isn't as Evil as he pretends to be. Petyr Baelish is a Chaotic Evil who pretends to be Good. None of them could suffer to be Lawful.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      Great answer! I knew I was forgetting something. I think you're right in suggesting that she needs an appealing side, otherwise she just comes across as a jerk.

      – Joe-You-Know
      2 hours ago
















    3














    I found a very elegant reduction of alignments in a Tumblr post:




    I figured out a simple guide to the alignment chart last night:


    Lawful: Rules matter more to me than individuals.


    Chaotic: Individuals matter more to me than rules.


    Good: Other people’s well-being is more important than my own.

    
Evil: My own well-being is more important than other people’s.


    Neutrals: My opinion of what is more important is determined on a case-by-case basis.


    So a Lawful Good character’s guiding moral philosophy might be “I follow the rules because the rules keep people safe, even if they are sometimes inconvenient or harmful to me or other individuals.” A Chaotic Evil character’s guiding moral philosophy would be like “Screw the rules and screw you.”


    If Joyce is Chaotic, she's concerned with individuals more than corporations (so she won't kill, because that would harm an individual). If she's Neutral, then sometimes she will decide that people are worth helping, and sometimes she won't.



    If you want to show her as Neutral rather than Evil, then you need a Pet the Dog moment. (TV Tropes warning!) You need to show that she is in the middle of the Good-Evil spectrum, and that she is capable of doing good things if it interests her. Ignoring child labor shoves her towards Evil, so I see your beta's point. There's a difference between self-interest and self-absorption. "I don't have to do anything about child labor because I don't know the kids" is not Neutral, it's Asshole.



    The journey from Neutral to Good is not a long one. But going from Chaotic Good (I will help other people, regardless of the rules) to Lawful Good (I will help other people as long as I can follow the rules to do so, and I won't break the rules to help people) is honestly the bigger challenge here. How do you get Joyce from "screw you, I do what I want" to "I can't stop GlobalMegaCorp from using child labor because it operates in Backwardsia, where there are no laws against it"?



    If you want your Leeeeeeeroy Jenkins! protagonist to be appealing, you have to make her appealing. She has to do things we like, or find fun, or could sympathize with. A selfish character can still be "not a jerk" if the character is capable of not being selfish all the time.



    Loki is a Chaotic Neutral who repeatedly swings from Evil to Good. Captain Jack Sparrow is a Chaotic Neutral who isn't as Evil as he pretends to be. Petyr Baelish is a Chaotic Evil who pretends to be Good. None of them could suffer to be Lawful.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      Great answer! I knew I was forgetting something. I think you're right in suggesting that she needs an appealing side, otherwise she just comes across as a jerk.

      – Joe-You-Know
      2 hours ago














    3












    3








    3







    I found a very elegant reduction of alignments in a Tumblr post:




    I figured out a simple guide to the alignment chart last night:


    Lawful: Rules matter more to me than individuals.


    Chaotic: Individuals matter more to me than rules.


    Good: Other people’s well-being is more important than my own.

    
Evil: My own well-being is more important than other people’s.


    Neutrals: My opinion of what is more important is determined on a case-by-case basis.


    So a Lawful Good character’s guiding moral philosophy might be “I follow the rules because the rules keep people safe, even if they are sometimes inconvenient or harmful to me or other individuals.” A Chaotic Evil character’s guiding moral philosophy would be like “Screw the rules and screw you.”


    If Joyce is Chaotic, she's concerned with individuals more than corporations (so she won't kill, because that would harm an individual). If she's Neutral, then sometimes she will decide that people are worth helping, and sometimes she won't.



    If you want to show her as Neutral rather than Evil, then you need a Pet the Dog moment. (TV Tropes warning!) You need to show that she is in the middle of the Good-Evil spectrum, and that she is capable of doing good things if it interests her. Ignoring child labor shoves her towards Evil, so I see your beta's point. There's a difference between self-interest and self-absorption. "I don't have to do anything about child labor because I don't know the kids" is not Neutral, it's Asshole.



    The journey from Neutral to Good is not a long one. But going from Chaotic Good (I will help other people, regardless of the rules) to Lawful Good (I will help other people as long as I can follow the rules to do so, and I won't break the rules to help people) is honestly the bigger challenge here. How do you get Joyce from "screw you, I do what I want" to "I can't stop GlobalMegaCorp from using child labor because it operates in Backwardsia, where there are no laws against it"?



    If you want your Leeeeeeeroy Jenkins! protagonist to be appealing, you have to make her appealing. She has to do things we like, or find fun, or could sympathize with. A selfish character can still be "not a jerk" if the character is capable of not being selfish all the time.



    Loki is a Chaotic Neutral who repeatedly swings from Evil to Good. Captain Jack Sparrow is a Chaotic Neutral who isn't as Evil as he pretends to be. Petyr Baelish is a Chaotic Evil who pretends to be Good. None of them could suffer to be Lawful.






    share|improve this answer













    I found a very elegant reduction of alignments in a Tumblr post:




    I figured out a simple guide to the alignment chart last night:


    Lawful: Rules matter more to me than individuals.


    Chaotic: Individuals matter more to me than rules.


    Good: Other people’s well-being is more important than my own.

    
Evil: My own well-being is more important than other people’s.


    Neutrals: My opinion of what is more important is determined on a case-by-case basis.


    So a Lawful Good character’s guiding moral philosophy might be “I follow the rules because the rules keep people safe, even if they are sometimes inconvenient or harmful to me or other individuals.” A Chaotic Evil character’s guiding moral philosophy would be like “Screw the rules and screw you.”


    If Joyce is Chaotic, she's concerned with individuals more than corporations (so she won't kill, because that would harm an individual). If she's Neutral, then sometimes she will decide that people are worth helping, and sometimes she won't.



    If you want to show her as Neutral rather than Evil, then you need a Pet the Dog moment. (TV Tropes warning!) You need to show that she is in the middle of the Good-Evil spectrum, and that she is capable of doing good things if it interests her. Ignoring child labor shoves her towards Evil, so I see your beta's point. There's a difference between self-interest and self-absorption. "I don't have to do anything about child labor because I don't know the kids" is not Neutral, it's Asshole.



    The journey from Neutral to Good is not a long one. But going from Chaotic Good (I will help other people, regardless of the rules) to Lawful Good (I will help other people as long as I can follow the rules to do so, and I won't break the rules to help people) is honestly the bigger challenge here. How do you get Joyce from "screw you, I do what I want" to "I can't stop GlobalMegaCorp from using child labor because it operates in Backwardsia, where there are no laws against it"?



    If you want your Leeeeeeeroy Jenkins! protagonist to be appealing, you have to make her appealing. She has to do things we like, or find fun, or could sympathize with. A selfish character can still be "not a jerk" if the character is capable of not being selfish all the time.



    Loki is a Chaotic Neutral who repeatedly swings from Evil to Good. Captain Jack Sparrow is a Chaotic Neutral who isn't as Evil as he pretends to be. Petyr Baelish is a Chaotic Evil who pretends to be Good. None of them could suffer to be Lawful.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    Lauren IpsumLauren Ipsum

    66k595216




    66k595216








    • 1





      Great answer! I knew I was forgetting something. I think you're right in suggesting that she needs an appealing side, otherwise she just comes across as a jerk.

      – Joe-You-Know
      2 hours ago














    • 1





      Great answer! I knew I was forgetting something. I think you're right in suggesting that she needs an appealing side, otherwise she just comes across as a jerk.

      – Joe-You-Know
      2 hours ago








    1




    1





    Great answer! I knew I was forgetting something. I think you're right in suggesting that she needs an appealing side, otherwise she just comes across as a jerk.

    – Joe-You-Know
    2 hours ago





    Great answer! I knew I was forgetting something. I think you're right in suggesting that she needs an appealing side, otherwise she just comes across as a jerk.

    – Joe-You-Know
    2 hours ago











    2














    First, love your character. If you don’t, why should the readers care? Make her more than just this skill she has - make her who she is rather than what she does.



    I have a hacker character who is a charming neutral, but assists assassins in a professional capacity. Most of what he does is what one might expect, but he takes joy in the challenge of checking a company’s security. He does other things, but has become the go-to if you need information that cannot be obtained otherwise.



    I started with him as just some semi-anonymous person on the dark-net. That lasted about five minutes as he developed into an interesting charismatic person.



    Joyce has a line she won’t cross, but acts as she does - why? Is she, like my hacker, intensely curious and striving to always improve his skills? Apathy is dangerous, self-absorbtion can be irksome.



    Give her a reason why she became Banshee. Who was she when she was just Joyce? She is trying to do some good by exposing this corporation, but why? The bitcoin? Or does she care, even if she doesn’t really know it herself?



    Does she perform this service because she believes, even subconsciously, in something? Is she a pure mercenary? Or does she charge what she does as a way of both justifying it to herself and fining those who have gone too far, who have no boundaries that she can see?






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      I like this. Having her show more confliction and hesitation would help her be more believable especially when she starts to transition to a good person. She thinks she doesn't care, but she does a little. I think showing that a bit could help her out. Bottom line is, she acts the way she does because she's trying to find something to care about.

      – Joe-You-Know
      2 hours ago
















    2














    First, love your character. If you don’t, why should the readers care? Make her more than just this skill she has - make her who she is rather than what she does.



    I have a hacker character who is a charming neutral, but assists assassins in a professional capacity. Most of what he does is what one might expect, but he takes joy in the challenge of checking a company’s security. He does other things, but has become the go-to if you need information that cannot be obtained otherwise.



    I started with him as just some semi-anonymous person on the dark-net. That lasted about five minutes as he developed into an interesting charismatic person.



    Joyce has a line she won’t cross, but acts as she does - why? Is she, like my hacker, intensely curious and striving to always improve his skills? Apathy is dangerous, self-absorbtion can be irksome.



    Give her a reason why she became Banshee. Who was she when she was just Joyce? She is trying to do some good by exposing this corporation, but why? The bitcoin? Or does she care, even if she doesn’t really know it herself?



    Does she perform this service because she believes, even subconsciously, in something? Is she a pure mercenary? Or does she charge what she does as a way of both justifying it to herself and fining those who have gone too far, who have no boundaries that she can see?






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      I like this. Having her show more confliction and hesitation would help her be more believable especially when she starts to transition to a good person. She thinks she doesn't care, but she does a little. I think showing that a bit could help her out. Bottom line is, she acts the way she does because she's trying to find something to care about.

      – Joe-You-Know
      2 hours ago














    2












    2








    2







    First, love your character. If you don’t, why should the readers care? Make her more than just this skill she has - make her who she is rather than what she does.



    I have a hacker character who is a charming neutral, but assists assassins in a professional capacity. Most of what he does is what one might expect, but he takes joy in the challenge of checking a company’s security. He does other things, but has become the go-to if you need information that cannot be obtained otherwise.



    I started with him as just some semi-anonymous person on the dark-net. That lasted about five minutes as he developed into an interesting charismatic person.



    Joyce has a line she won’t cross, but acts as she does - why? Is she, like my hacker, intensely curious and striving to always improve his skills? Apathy is dangerous, self-absorbtion can be irksome.



    Give her a reason why she became Banshee. Who was she when she was just Joyce? She is trying to do some good by exposing this corporation, but why? The bitcoin? Or does she care, even if she doesn’t really know it herself?



    Does she perform this service because she believes, even subconsciously, in something? Is she a pure mercenary? Or does she charge what she does as a way of both justifying it to herself and fining those who have gone too far, who have no boundaries that she can see?






    share|improve this answer













    First, love your character. If you don’t, why should the readers care? Make her more than just this skill she has - make her who she is rather than what she does.



    I have a hacker character who is a charming neutral, but assists assassins in a professional capacity. Most of what he does is what one might expect, but he takes joy in the challenge of checking a company’s security. He does other things, but has become the go-to if you need information that cannot be obtained otherwise.



    I started with him as just some semi-anonymous person on the dark-net. That lasted about five minutes as he developed into an interesting charismatic person.



    Joyce has a line she won’t cross, but acts as she does - why? Is she, like my hacker, intensely curious and striving to always improve his skills? Apathy is dangerous, self-absorbtion can be irksome.



    Give her a reason why she became Banshee. Who was she when she was just Joyce? She is trying to do some good by exposing this corporation, but why? The bitcoin? Or does she care, even if she doesn’t really know it herself?



    Does she perform this service because she believes, even subconsciously, in something? Is she a pure mercenary? Or does she charge what she does as a way of both justifying it to herself and fining those who have gone too far, who have no boundaries that she can see?







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    RasdashanRasdashan

    6,4821041




    6,4821041








    • 1





      I like this. Having her show more confliction and hesitation would help her be more believable especially when she starts to transition to a good person. She thinks she doesn't care, but she does a little. I think showing that a bit could help her out. Bottom line is, she acts the way she does because she's trying to find something to care about.

      – Joe-You-Know
      2 hours ago














    • 1





      I like this. Having her show more confliction and hesitation would help her be more believable especially when she starts to transition to a good person. She thinks she doesn't care, but she does a little. I think showing that a bit could help her out. Bottom line is, she acts the way she does because she's trying to find something to care about.

      – Joe-You-Know
      2 hours ago








    1




    1





    I like this. Having her show more confliction and hesitation would help her be more believable especially when she starts to transition to a good person. She thinks she doesn't care, but she does a little. I think showing that a bit could help her out. Bottom line is, she acts the way she does because she's trying to find something to care about.

    – Joe-You-Know
    2 hours ago





    I like this. Having her show more confliction and hesitation would help her be more believable especially when she starts to transition to a good person. She thinks she doesn't care, but she does a little. I think showing that a bit could help her out. Bottom line is, she acts the way she does because she's trying to find something to care about.

    – Joe-You-Know
    2 hours ago











    0















    Banshee_Harvest: Save your preaching for someone who actually cares. I was in this solely for the thrills.




    That response is quite extreme. Neutral would be more like:




    Banshee_Harvest: No worries. It was fun.




    The focus is still on the wrong thing, i.e. The fun.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user37107 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      0















      Banshee_Harvest: Save your preaching for someone who actually cares. I was in this solely for the thrills.




      That response is quite extreme. Neutral would be more like:




      Banshee_Harvest: No worries. It was fun.




      The focus is still on the wrong thing, i.e. The fun.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user37107 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.























        0












        0








        0








        Banshee_Harvest: Save your preaching for someone who actually cares. I was in this solely for the thrills.




        That response is quite extreme. Neutral would be more like:




        Banshee_Harvest: No worries. It was fun.




        The focus is still on the wrong thing, i.e. The fun.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        user37107 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.











        Banshee_Harvest: Save your preaching for someone who actually cares. I was in this solely for the thrills.




        That response is quite extreme. Neutral would be more like:




        Banshee_Harvest: No worries. It was fun.




        The focus is still on the wrong thing, i.e. The fun.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        user37107 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        user37107 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 16 mins ago









        user37107user37107

        1




        1




        New contributor




        user37107 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        user37107 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        user37107 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43138%2fhow-to-write-a-chaotic-neutral-protagonist-and-prevent-my-readers-from-thinking%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Szabolcs (Ungheria) Altri progetti | Menu di navigazione48°10′14.56″N 21°29′33.14″E /...

            Discografia di Klaus Schulze Indice Album in studio | Album dal vivo | Singoli | Antologie | Colonne...

            How to make inet_server_addr() return localhost in spite of ::1/128RETURN NEXT in Postgres FunctionConnect to...