Is “the fire consumed everything on its way” correct?Unconventional usage of “way”Writing two...

Premature ending of generator in list comprehension

How can the probability of a fumble decrease linearly with more dice?

Can 5 Aarakocra PCs summon an Air Elemental?

Is there a lava-breathing lizard creature (that could be worshipped by a cult) in 5e?

A Missing Symbol for This Logo

Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?

I have trouble understanding this fallacy: "If A, then B. Therefore if not-B, then not-A."

Looking for a specific 6502 Assembler

Square Root Distance from Integers

Why does magnet wire need to be insulated?

What game did these black and yellow dice come from?

Is there a verb that means to inject with poison?

How to politely refuse in-office gym instructor for steroids and protein

How does Leonard in "Memento" remember reading and writing?

Most demanding German Newspapers

How to make ice magic work from a scientific point of view?

False written accusations not made public - is there law to cover this?

What is a DAG (Graph Theory)?

A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?

Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?

Early credit roll before the end of the film

What will happen if I transfer large sums of money into my bank account from a pre-paid debit card or gift card?

Why don't key signatures indicate the tonic?

Bash script to truncate subject line of incoming email



Is “the fire consumed everything on its way” correct?


Unconventional usage of “way”Writing two sentences in a short wayI thought you were already goneI love how you love meWhen you are going to know indirectly / politely the name of the person you're meeting or talking to“The fact of its being” Grammarwhat are the subjects of these sentences?Is it grammatically correct to say “the baby can't eat himself” meaning that the baby can't eat without help?How should I use the word, “mean” in a question when regarding about the past?Meaning of “manually” in “manually detect copyright infringement”













3















I thought "on its way" and "in its way" were pretty much equivalent in English and meant pretty much the same thing except in very rare cases. Am I wrong? How do you know which one you should use?










share|improve this question



























    3















    I thought "on its way" and "in its way" were pretty much equivalent in English and meant pretty much the same thing except in very rare cases. Am I wrong? How do you know which one you should use?










    share|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3








      I thought "on its way" and "in its way" were pretty much equivalent in English and meant pretty much the same thing except in very rare cases. Am I wrong? How do you know which one you should use?










      share|improve this question














      I thought "on its way" and "in its way" were pretty much equivalent in English and meant pretty much the same thing except in very rare cases. Am I wrong? How do you know which one you should use?







      grammar idiomatic-language






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      repomonsterrepomonster

      68613




      68613






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.




          If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.




          "In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.




          You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.




          Another way to think about it is that something on the way is convenient, while something in the way is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:




          On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.




          Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.




          The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.




          "Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way.



          I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the nuance.






          share|improve this answer


























          • If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?

            – repomonster
            52 mins ago






          • 1





            @repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."

            – Andrew
            43 mins ago






          • 1





            @repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"

            – Andrew
            42 mins ago













          • It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.

            – David Schwartz
            16 mins ago



















          1














          They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.



          In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.



          'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.



          On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.



          Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.



          A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.



          However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.



          It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198374%2fis-the-fire-consumed-everything-on-its-way-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6














            They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.




            If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.




            "In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.




            You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.




            Another way to think about it is that something on the way is convenient, while something in the way is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:




            On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.




            Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.




            The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.




            "Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way.



            I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the nuance.






            share|improve this answer


























            • If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?

              – repomonster
              52 mins ago






            • 1





              @repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."

              – Andrew
              43 mins ago






            • 1





              @repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"

              – Andrew
              42 mins ago













            • It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.

              – David Schwartz
              16 mins ago
















            6














            They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.




            If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.




            "In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.




            You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.




            Another way to think about it is that something on the way is convenient, while something in the way is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:




            On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.




            Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.




            The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.




            "Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way.



            I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the nuance.






            share|improve this answer


























            • If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?

              – repomonster
              52 mins ago






            • 1





              @repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."

              – Andrew
              43 mins ago






            • 1





              @repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"

              – Andrew
              42 mins ago













            • It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.

              – David Schwartz
              16 mins ago














            6












            6








            6







            They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.




            If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.




            "In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.




            You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.




            Another way to think about it is that something on the way is convenient, while something in the way is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:




            On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.




            Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.




            The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.




            "Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way.



            I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the nuance.






            share|improve this answer















            They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.




            If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.




            "In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.




            You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.




            Another way to think about it is that something on the way is convenient, while something in the way is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:




            On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.




            Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.




            The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.




            "Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way.



            I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the nuance.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 48 mins ago

























            answered 54 mins ago









            AndrewAndrew

            68.7k677152




            68.7k677152













            • If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?

              – repomonster
              52 mins ago






            • 1





              @repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."

              – Andrew
              43 mins ago






            • 1





              @repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"

              – Andrew
              42 mins ago













            • It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.

              – David Schwartz
              16 mins ago



















            • If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?

              – repomonster
              52 mins ago






            • 1





              @repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."

              – Andrew
              43 mins ago






            • 1





              @repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"

              – Andrew
              42 mins ago













            • It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.

              – David Schwartz
              16 mins ago

















            If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?

            – repomonster
            52 mins ago





            If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?

            – repomonster
            52 mins ago




            1




            1





            @repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."

            – Andrew
            43 mins ago





            @repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."

            – Andrew
            43 mins ago




            1




            1





            @repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"

            – Andrew
            42 mins ago







            @repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"

            – Andrew
            42 mins ago















            It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.

            – David Schwartz
            16 mins ago





            It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.

            – David Schwartz
            16 mins ago













            1














            They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.



            In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.



            'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.



            On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.



            Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.



            A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.



            However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.



            It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.






            share|improve this answer






























              1














              They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.



              In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.



              'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.



              On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.



              Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.



              A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.



              However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.



              It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.






              share|improve this answer




























                1












                1








                1







                They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.



                In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.



                'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.



                On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.



                Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.



                A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.



                However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.



                It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.






                share|improve this answer















                They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.



                In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.



                'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.



                On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.



                Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.



                A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.



                However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.



                It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 4 mins ago

























                answered 49 mins ago









                ShuleShule

                23016




                23016






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198374%2fis-the-fire-consumed-everything-on-its-way-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Armoriale delle famiglie italiane (Car) Indice Armi | Bibliografia | Menu di navigazioneBlasone...

                    Why does this relation fail symmetry and transitivity properties?Properties of Relations. Reflexive,...

                    why typing a variable (or expression) prints the value to stdout?Calling a function of a module by using its...