Does 'rm -fr` remove the boot loader?Add an entry for Ubuntu on Windows 8 boot loaderUninstall Grub and use...

Approaches to criticizing short fiction

Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview

Why did Bush enact a completely different foreign policy to that which he espoused during the 2000 Presidential election campaign?

Could flying insects re-enter the Earth's atmosphere from space without burning up?

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

How would one buy a used TIE Fighter or X-Wing?

What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?

If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?

Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?

Can a person refuse a presidential pardon?

Is there a better way to make this?

How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?

Slow moving projectiles from a hand-held weapon - how do they reach the target?

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

How can I improve my fireworks photography?

Strange Sign on Lab Door

What is the time complexity of enqueue and dequeue of a queue implemented with a singly linked list?

Program that converts a number to a letter of the alphabet

Does Windows 10's telemetry include sending *.doc files if Word crashed?

How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?

I am on the US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?



Does 'rm -fr` remove the boot loader?


Add an entry for Ubuntu on Windows 8 boot loaderUninstall Grub and use Windows bootloaderAfter install grub boot loader does not showWhat is the difference between boot loader and bootstrap loader?No boot loader is installed in the MBR of /dev/sda. Is that some pain to a only Win8.1 system?ubuntu does not boot upIs there a Boot-Repair for Ubuntu 15.04?Revert to original Apple Boot LoaderGrub2 does not load windows loader in multiboot systemBoot Loader failing to load windows 10













1















I learned that the boot loader is permanently stored in the machine's ROM and today’s PCs is constructed with flash memory technology so it could be altered under special circumstances.



Is rm -rf / is the special circumstance?



Does rm -rf remove the boot loader?










share|improve this question



























    1















    I learned that the boot loader is permanently stored in the machine's ROM and today’s PCs is constructed with flash memory technology so it could be altered under special circumstances.



    Is rm -rf / is the special circumstance?



    Does rm -rf remove the boot loader?










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      I learned that the boot loader is permanently stored in the machine's ROM and today’s PCs is constructed with flash memory technology so it could be altered under special circumstances.



      Is rm -rf / is the special circumstance?



      Does rm -rf remove the boot loader?










      share|improve this question














      I learned that the boot loader is permanently stored in the machine's ROM and today’s PCs is constructed with flash memory technology so it could be altered under special circumstances.



      Is rm -rf / is the special circumstance?



      Does rm -rf remove the boot loader?







      boot






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      AliceAlice

      426110




      426110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          TL;DR: rm -rf / doesn't remove bootloader itself, but everything that bootloader needs (and everything OS needs to function).




          boot loader is permanently stored in the machine's ROM




          Not quite. On most modern systems, bootloader can be either on Master Boot Record part of the disk - the first 512 MB - or it can be on separate device (see also). And to quote Wikipedia about linux kernel image:




          ...limitations on some i386 systems meant only the first 1024 cylinders of the hard disk were addressable.



          To overcome this, Linux distributors encouraged users to create a partition at the beginning of their drives specifically for storing bootloader and kernel related files.




          Embedded systems, such as Raspberry Pi, may in fact have a bootloader (or first stage bootloader) in ROM.





          rm -rf / like any other command is loaded in memory and executed from there, so it removes recursively everything in / directory (/ filesystem), including its own original file /bin/rm. It generally knows nothing about MBR partition and operates only on all files/directories that can be found under /.



          In other words, the first 512 MB of disk that have the bootloader itself aren't removed, but /boot directory is removed, and that does contain configuration files for bootloader (typically GRUB) and temporary filesystem initrd.img which is loaded before the main / filesystem. If you look at the Grub rescue article on linux.com, you'll see that even though bootloader itself might be working, it has to know the disk on which root filesystem is located, where kernel image vmlinuz is located, and initrd. That is, the example they give in grub's shell is



          grub> set root=(hd0,1)
          grub> linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic root=/dev/sda1
          grub> initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-29-generic
          grub> boot


          where (hd0,1) identifies disk and partition with root filesystem.



          Even though bootloader itself is not removed, when /boot alone is removed that does lead to problems. In case of rm -rf / you are removing everything from filesystem, including init - the very first process, the kernel






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "89"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1122619%2fdoes-rm-fr-remove-the-boot-loader%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            TL;DR: rm -rf / doesn't remove bootloader itself, but everything that bootloader needs (and everything OS needs to function).




            boot loader is permanently stored in the machine's ROM




            Not quite. On most modern systems, bootloader can be either on Master Boot Record part of the disk - the first 512 MB - or it can be on separate device (see also). And to quote Wikipedia about linux kernel image:




            ...limitations on some i386 systems meant only the first 1024 cylinders of the hard disk were addressable.



            To overcome this, Linux distributors encouraged users to create a partition at the beginning of their drives specifically for storing bootloader and kernel related files.




            Embedded systems, such as Raspberry Pi, may in fact have a bootloader (or first stage bootloader) in ROM.





            rm -rf / like any other command is loaded in memory and executed from there, so it removes recursively everything in / directory (/ filesystem), including its own original file /bin/rm. It generally knows nothing about MBR partition and operates only on all files/directories that can be found under /.



            In other words, the first 512 MB of disk that have the bootloader itself aren't removed, but /boot directory is removed, and that does contain configuration files for bootloader (typically GRUB) and temporary filesystem initrd.img which is loaded before the main / filesystem. If you look at the Grub rescue article on linux.com, you'll see that even though bootloader itself might be working, it has to know the disk on which root filesystem is located, where kernel image vmlinuz is located, and initrd. That is, the example they give in grub's shell is



            grub> set root=(hd0,1)
            grub> linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic root=/dev/sda1
            grub> initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-29-generic
            grub> boot


            where (hd0,1) identifies disk and partition with root filesystem.



            Even though bootloader itself is not removed, when /boot alone is removed that does lead to problems. In case of rm -rf / you are removing everything from filesystem, including init - the very first process, the kernel






            share|improve this answer






























              2














              TL;DR: rm -rf / doesn't remove bootloader itself, but everything that bootloader needs (and everything OS needs to function).




              boot loader is permanently stored in the machine's ROM




              Not quite. On most modern systems, bootloader can be either on Master Boot Record part of the disk - the first 512 MB - or it can be on separate device (see also). And to quote Wikipedia about linux kernel image:




              ...limitations on some i386 systems meant only the first 1024 cylinders of the hard disk were addressable.



              To overcome this, Linux distributors encouraged users to create a partition at the beginning of their drives specifically for storing bootloader and kernel related files.




              Embedded systems, such as Raspberry Pi, may in fact have a bootloader (or first stage bootloader) in ROM.





              rm -rf / like any other command is loaded in memory and executed from there, so it removes recursively everything in / directory (/ filesystem), including its own original file /bin/rm. It generally knows nothing about MBR partition and operates only on all files/directories that can be found under /.



              In other words, the first 512 MB of disk that have the bootloader itself aren't removed, but /boot directory is removed, and that does contain configuration files for bootloader (typically GRUB) and temporary filesystem initrd.img which is loaded before the main / filesystem. If you look at the Grub rescue article on linux.com, you'll see that even though bootloader itself might be working, it has to know the disk on which root filesystem is located, where kernel image vmlinuz is located, and initrd. That is, the example they give in grub's shell is



              grub> set root=(hd0,1)
              grub> linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic root=/dev/sda1
              grub> initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-29-generic
              grub> boot


              where (hd0,1) identifies disk and partition with root filesystem.



              Even though bootloader itself is not removed, when /boot alone is removed that does lead to problems. In case of rm -rf / you are removing everything from filesystem, including init - the very first process, the kernel






              share|improve this answer




























                2












                2








                2







                TL;DR: rm -rf / doesn't remove bootloader itself, but everything that bootloader needs (and everything OS needs to function).




                boot loader is permanently stored in the machine's ROM




                Not quite. On most modern systems, bootloader can be either on Master Boot Record part of the disk - the first 512 MB - or it can be on separate device (see also). And to quote Wikipedia about linux kernel image:




                ...limitations on some i386 systems meant only the first 1024 cylinders of the hard disk were addressable.



                To overcome this, Linux distributors encouraged users to create a partition at the beginning of their drives specifically for storing bootloader and kernel related files.




                Embedded systems, such as Raspberry Pi, may in fact have a bootloader (or first stage bootloader) in ROM.





                rm -rf / like any other command is loaded in memory and executed from there, so it removes recursively everything in / directory (/ filesystem), including its own original file /bin/rm. It generally knows nothing about MBR partition and operates only on all files/directories that can be found under /.



                In other words, the first 512 MB of disk that have the bootloader itself aren't removed, but /boot directory is removed, and that does contain configuration files for bootloader (typically GRUB) and temporary filesystem initrd.img which is loaded before the main / filesystem. If you look at the Grub rescue article on linux.com, you'll see that even though bootloader itself might be working, it has to know the disk on which root filesystem is located, where kernel image vmlinuz is located, and initrd. That is, the example they give in grub's shell is



                grub> set root=(hd0,1)
                grub> linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic root=/dev/sda1
                grub> initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-29-generic
                grub> boot


                where (hd0,1) identifies disk and partition with root filesystem.



                Even though bootloader itself is not removed, when /boot alone is removed that does lead to problems. In case of rm -rf / you are removing everything from filesystem, including init - the very first process, the kernel






                share|improve this answer















                TL;DR: rm -rf / doesn't remove bootloader itself, but everything that bootloader needs (and everything OS needs to function).




                boot loader is permanently stored in the machine's ROM




                Not quite. On most modern systems, bootloader can be either on Master Boot Record part of the disk - the first 512 MB - or it can be on separate device (see also). And to quote Wikipedia about linux kernel image:




                ...limitations on some i386 systems meant only the first 1024 cylinders of the hard disk were addressable.



                To overcome this, Linux distributors encouraged users to create a partition at the beginning of their drives specifically for storing bootloader and kernel related files.




                Embedded systems, such as Raspberry Pi, may in fact have a bootloader (or first stage bootloader) in ROM.





                rm -rf / like any other command is loaded in memory and executed from there, so it removes recursively everything in / directory (/ filesystem), including its own original file /bin/rm. It generally knows nothing about MBR partition and operates only on all files/directories that can be found under /.



                In other words, the first 512 MB of disk that have the bootloader itself aren't removed, but /boot directory is removed, and that does contain configuration files for bootloader (typically GRUB) and temporary filesystem initrd.img which is loaded before the main / filesystem. If you look at the Grub rescue article on linux.com, you'll see that even though bootloader itself might be working, it has to know the disk on which root filesystem is located, where kernel image vmlinuz is located, and initrd. That is, the example they give in grub's shell is



                grub> set root=(hd0,1)
                grub> linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic root=/dev/sda1
                grub> initrd /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-29-generic
                grub> boot


                where (hd0,1) identifies disk and partition with root filesystem.



                Even though bootloader itself is not removed, when /boot alone is removed that does lead to problems. In case of rm -rf / you are removing everything from filesystem, including init - the very first process, the kernel







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 1 hour ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy

                73.4k9153318




                73.4k9153318






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1122619%2fdoes-rm-fr-remove-the-boot-loader%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Szabolcs (Ungheria) Altri progetti | Menu di navigazione48°10′14.56″N 21°29′33.14″E /...

                    Discografia di Klaus Schulze Indice Album in studio | Album dal vivo | Singoli | Antologie | Colonne...

                    How to make inet_server_addr() return localhost in spite of ::1/128RETURN NEXT in Postgres FunctionConnect to...