A cancellation property for permutationsNumber of Permutations with k-inversions and with a single clamped...
A cancellation property for permutations
Number of Permutations with k-inversions and with a single clamped value“flavored” equivalence classes of permutationspattern-avoiding permutations vs multi-core partitionsCommon name for totally non-intersecting permutationsSum over permutations is 1Solutions of $x^d=1$ in the symmetric grouptrace and involution permutations: Part Itrace and involution permutations: Part IICounting block-equivalent permutationsOdd permutations $tauin S_n$ with $sum_{k=1}^nktau(k)$ an odd square
$begingroup$
Let $mathfrak{G}_n$ be the group of $n$-permutations. Denote the number of inversions of $sigmainmathfrak{G}_n$ by $ell(sigma)$.
QUESTION. Assume $n>2$. Does this cancellation property hold true?
$$sum_{sigmainmathfrak{G}_n}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^ni(i-sigma(i)).$$
nt.number-theory co.combinatorics finite-groups permutations combinatorial-identities
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathfrak{G}_n$ be the group of $n$-permutations. Denote the number of inversions of $sigmainmathfrak{G}_n$ by $ell(sigma)$.
QUESTION. Assume $n>2$. Does this cancellation property hold true?
$$sum_{sigmainmathfrak{G}_n}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^ni(i-sigma(i)).$$
nt.number-theory co.combinatorics finite-groups permutations combinatorial-identities
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Is there a missing "=0"?
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
Why $mathfrak{G}_n$?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
$sum_i i(i-sigma(i))$ is also known as the inversion sum of a permutation, see findstat.org/StatisticsDatabase/St000055
$endgroup$
– FindStat
19 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathfrak{G}_n$ be the group of $n$-permutations. Denote the number of inversions of $sigmainmathfrak{G}_n$ by $ell(sigma)$.
QUESTION. Assume $n>2$. Does this cancellation property hold true?
$$sum_{sigmainmathfrak{G}_n}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^ni(i-sigma(i)).$$
nt.number-theory co.combinatorics finite-groups permutations combinatorial-identities
$endgroup$
Let $mathfrak{G}_n$ be the group of $n$-permutations. Denote the number of inversions of $sigmainmathfrak{G}_n$ by $ell(sigma)$.
QUESTION. Assume $n>2$. Does this cancellation property hold true?
$$sum_{sigmainmathfrak{G}_n}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^ni(i-sigma(i)).$$
nt.number-theory co.combinatorics finite-groups permutations combinatorial-identities
nt.number-theory co.combinatorics finite-groups permutations combinatorial-identities
asked 44 mins ago
T. AmdeberhanT. Amdeberhan
17.5k229129
17.5k229129
3
$begingroup$
Is there a missing "=0"?
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
Why $mathfrak{G}_n$?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
$sum_i i(i-sigma(i))$ is also known as the inversion sum of a permutation, see findstat.org/StatisticsDatabase/St000055
$endgroup$
– FindStat
19 mins ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Is there a missing "=0"?
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
Why $mathfrak{G}_n$?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
$sum_i i(i-sigma(i))$ is also known as the inversion sum of a permutation, see findstat.org/StatisticsDatabase/St000055
$endgroup$
– FindStat
19 mins ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Is there a missing "=0"?
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
Is there a missing "=0"?
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
Why $mathfrak{G}_n$?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
Why $mathfrak{G}_n$?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
$sum_i i(i-sigma(i))$ is also known as the inversion sum of a permutation, see findstat.org/StatisticsDatabase/St000055
$endgroup$
– FindStat
19 mins ago
$begingroup$
$sum_i i(i-sigma(i))$ is also known as the inversion sum of a permutation, see findstat.org/StatisticsDatabase/St000055
$endgroup$
– FindStat
19 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $n$ be some integer greater than 2. Since the number of even and odd permutations in $S_n$ is the same we have $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}=0$ therefore the contribution of $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}left(sum_{i=1}^n i^2right)$ is zero. It remains to show that
$$sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i)=0.$$
Notice that if we write $P(x)=detleft(x^{ij}right)_{i,j=1}^n$ then this sum is simply $P'(1)$. However the order of vanishing of $P$ at $1$ is $binom{n}{2}$ (notice that the matrix is pretty much a Vandermonde matrix) and this is greater than $1$ since $n>2$, therefore $P'(1)=0$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Alternatively, $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i) = sum_{i=1}^n i sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)} sigma(i)$. But it is easy to check that the inner sum is $0$ for each $i$ (because for any given $i$ and $j$, there are as many even as there are odd permutations among those $sigma in S_n$ that send $i$ to $j$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f323764%2fa-cancellation-property-for-permutations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $n$ be some integer greater than 2. Since the number of even and odd permutations in $S_n$ is the same we have $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}=0$ therefore the contribution of $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}left(sum_{i=1}^n i^2right)$ is zero. It remains to show that
$$sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i)=0.$$
Notice that if we write $P(x)=detleft(x^{ij}right)_{i,j=1}^n$ then this sum is simply $P'(1)$. However the order of vanishing of $P$ at $1$ is $binom{n}{2}$ (notice that the matrix is pretty much a Vandermonde matrix) and this is greater than $1$ since $n>2$, therefore $P'(1)=0$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Alternatively, $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i) = sum_{i=1}^n i sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)} sigma(i)$. But it is easy to check that the inner sum is $0$ for each $i$ (because for any given $i$ and $j$, there are as many even as there are odd permutations among those $sigma in S_n$ that send $i$ to $j$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
25 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n$ be some integer greater than 2. Since the number of even and odd permutations in $S_n$ is the same we have $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}=0$ therefore the contribution of $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}left(sum_{i=1}^n i^2right)$ is zero. It remains to show that
$$sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i)=0.$$
Notice that if we write $P(x)=detleft(x^{ij}right)_{i,j=1}^n$ then this sum is simply $P'(1)$. However the order of vanishing of $P$ at $1$ is $binom{n}{2}$ (notice that the matrix is pretty much a Vandermonde matrix) and this is greater than $1$ since $n>2$, therefore $P'(1)=0$.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Alternatively, $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i) = sum_{i=1}^n i sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)} sigma(i)$. But it is easy to check that the inner sum is $0$ for each $i$ (because for any given $i$ and $j$, there are as many even as there are odd permutations among those $sigma in S_n$ that send $i$ to $j$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
25 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $n$ be some integer greater than 2. Since the number of even and odd permutations in $S_n$ is the same we have $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}=0$ therefore the contribution of $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}left(sum_{i=1}^n i^2right)$ is zero. It remains to show that
$$sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i)=0.$$
Notice that if we write $P(x)=detleft(x^{ij}right)_{i,j=1}^n$ then this sum is simply $P'(1)$. However the order of vanishing of $P$ at $1$ is $binom{n}{2}$ (notice that the matrix is pretty much a Vandermonde matrix) and this is greater than $1$ since $n>2$, therefore $P'(1)=0$.
$endgroup$
Let $n$ be some integer greater than 2. Since the number of even and odd permutations in $S_n$ is the same we have $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}=0$ therefore the contribution of $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}left(sum_{i=1}^n i^2right)$ is zero. It remains to show that
$$sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i)=0.$$
Notice that if we write $P(x)=detleft(x^{ij}right)_{i,j=1}^n$ then this sum is simply $P'(1)$. However the order of vanishing of $P$ at $1$ is $binom{n}{2}$ (notice that the matrix is pretty much a Vandermonde matrix) and this is greater than $1$ since $n>2$, therefore $P'(1)=0$.
answered 28 mins ago
Gjergji ZaimiGjergji Zaimi
63.3k4165313
63.3k4165313
2
$begingroup$
Alternatively, $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i) = sum_{i=1}^n i sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)} sigma(i)$. But it is easy to check that the inner sum is $0$ for each $i$ (because for any given $i$ and $j$, there are as many even as there are odd permutations among those $sigma in S_n$ that send $i$ to $j$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
25 mins ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Alternatively, $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i) = sum_{i=1}^n i sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)} sigma(i)$. But it is easy to check that the inner sum is $0$ for each $i$ (because for any given $i$ and $j$, there are as many even as there are odd permutations among those $sigma in S_n$ that send $i$ to $j$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
25 mins ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Alternatively, $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i) = sum_{i=1}^n i sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)} sigma(i)$. But it is easy to check that the inner sum is $0$ for each $i$ (because for any given $i$ and $j$, there are as many even as there are odd permutations among those $sigma in S_n$ that send $i$ to $j$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
25 mins ago
$begingroup$
Alternatively, $sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)}sum_{i=1}^n isigma(i) = sum_{i=1}^n i sum_{sigmain S_{n}}(-1)^{ell(sigma)} sigma(i)$. But it is easy to check that the inner sum is $0$ for each $i$ (because for any given $i$ and $j$, there are as many even as there are odd permutations among those $sigma in S_n$ that send $i$ to $j$).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f323764%2fa-cancellation-property-for-permutations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Is there a missing "=0"?
$endgroup$
– Gjergji Zaimi
35 mins ago
$begingroup$
Why $mathfrak{G}_n$?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
$sum_i i(i-sigma(i))$ is also known as the inversion sum of a permutation, see findstat.org/StatisticsDatabase/St000055
$endgroup$
– FindStat
19 mins ago