Ygthkb

View Angle Calculation

Manipulating a general length function

Can you earn endless XP using a Flameskull and its self-revival feature?

Why don't I see the difference between two different files in insert mode in vim?

The vanishing of sum of coefficients: symmetric polynomials

Can we use the stored gravitational potential energy of a building to produce power?

How to remove trailing forward slash

How do we succintly describe a boxing match?

How would one buy a used TIE Fighter or X-Wing?

What to do if authors don't respond to my serious concerns about their paper?

Explain the objections to these measures against human trafficking

How is the Incom shipyard still in business?

What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?

Closed form for these polynomials?

How experienced do I need to be to go on a photography workshop?

Unwarranted claim of higher degree of accuracy in zircon geochronology

Why avoid shared user accounts?

How to deal with an incendiary email that was recalled

How to find a specific kernel version in the Github repository?

Eww, those bytes are gross

Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?

Number of FLOP (Floating Point Operations) for exponentiation

How do creatures spend Hit Dice after a short rest (if they can do so)?

A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?

Does the “particle exchange” operator have any validity?

If wavefunction is just a probability function, how does an electron interfere with itselfIs it accurate to say “a wavefunction is a function of particle positions or momenta”?In Bohmian mechanics, how does the particle's position affect where a particle is detected?What is meant by the term “single particle state”Does quantum mechanics imply that particles have no trajectories?Why is the phase picked up during identical particle exchange a topological invariant?Are quantum mechanics non-deterministic?Creation and annihilation operators for any operator which has discrete and countable eigenvalues?Do the exchange operator and Hamiltonian commute for non-identical particles?Would every particle in the universe not have some form of measurement occurring at any given time?

2

$begingroup$

In introductory quantum mechanics books the topic of identical particles often introduces a "particle exchange" operator. This operator, when applied to a multi-particle wave-function, exchanges the positions of two identical particles.

However, it seems to me that this is a non-physical thing. Particles can't really "exchange positions" can they? Does such an operator really have validity?

quantum-mechanics

share|cite|improve this question

asked 48 mins ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,049112

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

In introductory quantum mechanics books the topic of identical particles often introduces a "particle exchange" operator. This operator, when applied to a multi-particle wave-function, exchanges the positions of two identical particles.

However, it seems to me that this is a non-physical thing. Particles can't really "exchange positions" can they? Does such an operator really have validity?

quantum-mechanics

share|cite|improve this question

asked 48 mins ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,049112

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

In introductory quantum mechanics books the topic of identical particles often introduces a "particle exchange" operator. This operator, when applied to a multi-particle wave-function, exchanges the positions of two identical particles.

However, it seems to me that this is a non-physical thing. Particles can't really "exchange positions" can they? Does such an operator really have validity?

quantum-mechanics

share|cite|improve this question

asked 48 mins ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,049112

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

asked 48 mins ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,049112

share|cite|improve this question

asked 48 mins ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,049112

asked 48 mins ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,049112

asked 48 mins ago

Paul YoungPaul Young

1,049112

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

4

$begingroup$

If I'm reading your question right, I think you're having a relatively common issue. Feynman himself had the same issue when confronted with a creation operator for an electron. "How can an electron really be created? It violates the conservation of charge!"

The point is that not every operator needs to represent a physical realizable time evolution. Quite often, you just want to consider the formal properties of an abstract operator, regardless of whether it has any direct meaning itself. (In fact, at the level of quantum field theory, it certainly doesn't -- the particle exchange operator does nothing whatsoever, because the particles are identical. The simpler formalism of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics doesn't have that built in, which is why it's useful to consider the exchange operator.)

You've already seen this attitude earlier in quantum mechanics. For example, the position operator $hat{x}$ is not a "physical thing", in the sense that if you have a state $|psi rangle$, $hat{x} |psi rangle$ is not necessarily a sensible physical state. Instead $hat{x}$ is useful because it represents an observable quantity. In quantum mechanics, operators are our basic tools. Some represent observables, some represent physical time evolutions, and some represent neither, and there's nothing wrong with those last ones.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 31 mins ago

knzhouknzhou

44.6k11121215

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f464019%2fdoes-the-particle-exchange-operator-have-any-validity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

4

$begingroup$

If I'm reading your question right, I think you're having a relatively common issue. Feynman himself had the same issue when confronted with a creation operator for an electron. "How can an electron really be created? It violates the conservation of charge!"

The point is that not every operator needs to represent a physical realizable time evolution. Quite often, you just want to consider the formal properties of an abstract operator, regardless of whether it has any direct meaning itself. (In fact, at the level of quantum field theory, it certainly doesn't -- the particle exchange operator does nothing whatsoever, because the particles are identical. The simpler formalism of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics doesn't have that built in, which is why it's useful to consider the exchange operator.)

You've already seen this attitude earlier in quantum mechanics. For example, the position operator $hat{x}$ is not a "physical thing", in the sense that if you have a state $|psi rangle$, $hat{x} |psi rangle$ is not necessarily a sensible physical state. Instead $hat{x}$ is useful because it represents an observable quantity. In quantum mechanics, operators are our basic tools. Some represent observables, some represent physical time evolutions, and some represent neither, and there's nothing wrong with those last ones.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 31 mins ago

knzhouknzhou

44.6k11121215

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

4

$begingroup$

If I'm reading your question right, I think you're having a relatively common issue. Feynman himself had the same issue when confronted with a creation operator for an electron. "How can an electron really be created? It violates the conservation of charge!"

The point is that not every operator needs to represent a physical realizable time evolution. Quite often, you just want to consider the formal properties of an abstract operator, regardless of whether it has any direct meaning itself. (In fact, at the level of quantum field theory, it certainly doesn't -- the particle exchange operator does nothing whatsoever, because the particles are identical. The simpler formalism of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics doesn't have that built in, which is why it's useful to consider the exchange operator.)

You've already seen this attitude earlier in quantum mechanics. For example, the position operator $hat{x}$ is not a "physical thing", in the sense that if you have a state $|psi rangle$, $hat{x} |psi rangle$ is not necessarily a sensible physical state. Instead $hat{x}$ is useful because it represents an observable quantity. In quantum mechanics, operators are our basic tools. Some represent observables, some represent physical time evolutions, and some represent neither, and there's nothing wrong with those last ones.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 31 mins ago

knzhouknzhou

44.6k11121215

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

If I'm reading your question right, I think you're having a relatively common issue. Feynman himself had the same issue when confronted with a creation operator for an electron. "How can an electron really be created? It violates the conservation of charge!"

The point is that not every operator needs to represent a physical realizable time evolution. Quite often, you just want to consider the formal properties of an abstract operator, regardless of whether it has any direct meaning itself. (In fact, at the level of quantum field theory, it certainly doesn't -- the particle exchange operator does nothing whatsoever, because the particles are identical. The simpler formalism of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics doesn't have that built in, which is why it's useful to consider the exchange operator.)

You've already seen this attitude earlier in quantum mechanics. For example, the position operator $hat{x}$ is not a "physical thing", in the sense that if you have a state $|psi rangle$, $hat{x} |psi rangle$ is not necessarily a sensible physical state. Instead $hat{x}$ is useful because it represents an observable quantity. In quantum mechanics, operators are our basic tools. Some represent observables, some represent physical time evolutions, and some represent neither, and there's nothing wrong with those last ones.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 31 mins ago

knzhouknzhou

44.6k11121215

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 31 mins ago

knzhouknzhou

44.6k11121215

answered 31 mins ago

knzhouknzhou

44.6k11121215

answered 31 mins ago

knzhouknzhou

44.6k11121215