Is there Such Thing As The Opposite of Unique ConstraintCreating a partial unique constraint for MySQLHow can...

Six real numbers so that product of any five is the sixth one

Significance and timing of "mux scans"

Closure of presentable objects under finite limits

Pure Functions: Does "No Side Effects" Imply "Always Same Output, Given Same Input"?

The change directory (cd) command is not working with a USB drive

Book where the good guy lives backwards through time and the bad guy lives forward

What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?

What type of postprocessing gives the effect of people standing out

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?

I am on the US no-fly list. What can I do in order to be allowed on flights which go through US airspace?

What is a term for a function that when called repeatedly, has the same effect as calling once?

Second-rate spelling

You'll find me clean when something is full

Are small insurances worth it

Compare four integers, return word based on maximum

Is there any relevance to Thor getting his hair cut other than comedic value?

I encountered my boss during an on-site interview at another company. Should I bring it up when seeing him next time?

chrony vs. systemd-timesyncd – What are the differences and use cases as NTP clients?

Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?

Make me a metasequence

Exponential growth/decay formula: what happened to the other constant of integration?

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?

Which aircraft had such a luxurious-looking navigator's station?



Is there Such Thing As The Opposite of Unique Constraint


Creating a partial unique constraint for MySQLHow can I achieve a unique constraint with two fields?check key if exists in other table without fk constraintEnforce a column as unique based on another column valueDuplicate key value violates a unique constraintCreating a UNIQUE constraint from a JSON objectConstraint on existing table - unique combination of values only when another column is nullCan I specify a name for the index which SQL Server creates for my unique constraint?Create a unique constraint on a column based on distinct value from another column in the same tablePostgreSQL - Enforcing unique constraint on date column parts













0















I want to be constrain my database with what is essentially the opposite of a UNIQUE constraint. I want to only be able to add a new row if some combination of fields has been added before.



Note: I am working within postgres.



Take the following datasets for example. I want a "NON UNIQUE" constraint on the following:



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

1, b, 1


I should not have been able to add the row (1, b, 1) since it has not appeared before. There are also other fields I don't want to constrain so it's not like all the entries are identical.



This may be a separate question, but I would also like to add the constraint that all rows with the same value in one column (i.e. a in the above example) have the same value in another.



So I want this to be impossible



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

0, a, 1


But this is ok



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

0, b, 1


I have looked around pretty heavily and the opposite of this is possible
with unique constraints, but I can't find anything that works for this.
Check constraints will only look at the row in question, and won't take into account the entire table's entries like a unique constraint would.



Is this even possible? Or is this now out of the realms of Postgres functionality, and must be done in-application.









share







New contributor




JDGale8 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Why is one valid and the other is not?

    – Michael Kutz
    2 mins ago
















0















I want to be constrain my database with what is essentially the opposite of a UNIQUE constraint. I want to only be able to add a new row if some combination of fields has been added before.



Note: I am working within postgres.



Take the following datasets for example. I want a "NON UNIQUE" constraint on the following:



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

1, b, 1


I should not have been able to add the row (1, b, 1) since it has not appeared before. There are also other fields I don't want to constrain so it's not like all the entries are identical.



This may be a separate question, but I would also like to add the constraint that all rows with the same value in one column (i.e. a in the above example) have the same value in another.



So I want this to be impossible



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

0, a, 1


But this is ok



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

0, b, 1


I have looked around pretty heavily and the opposite of this is possible
with unique constraints, but I can't find anything that works for this.
Check constraints will only look at the row in question, and won't take into account the entire table's entries like a unique constraint would.



Is this even possible? Or is this now out of the realms of Postgres functionality, and must be done in-application.









share







New contributor




JDGale8 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Why is one valid and the other is not?

    – Michael Kutz
    2 mins ago














0












0








0








I want to be constrain my database with what is essentially the opposite of a UNIQUE constraint. I want to only be able to add a new row if some combination of fields has been added before.



Note: I am working within postgres.



Take the following datasets for example. I want a "NON UNIQUE" constraint on the following:



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

1, b, 1


I should not have been able to add the row (1, b, 1) since it has not appeared before. There are also other fields I don't want to constrain so it's not like all the entries are identical.



This may be a separate question, but I would also like to add the constraint that all rows with the same value in one column (i.e. a in the above example) have the same value in another.



So I want this to be impossible



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

0, a, 1


But this is ok



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

0, b, 1


I have looked around pretty heavily and the opposite of this is possible
with unique constraints, but I can't find anything that works for this.
Check constraints will only look at the row in question, and won't take into account the entire table's entries like a unique constraint would.



Is this even possible? Or is this now out of the realms of Postgres functionality, and must be done in-application.









share







New contributor




JDGale8 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I want to be constrain my database with what is essentially the opposite of a UNIQUE constraint. I want to only be able to add a new row if some combination of fields has been added before.



Note: I am working within postgres.



Take the following datasets for example. I want a "NON UNIQUE" constraint on the following:



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

1, b, 1


I should not have been able to add the row (1, b, 1) since it has not appeared before. There are also other fields I don't want to constrain so it's not like all the entries are identical.



This may be a separate question, but I would also like to add the constraint that all rows with the same value in one column (i.e. a in the above example) have the same value in another.



So I want this to be impossible



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

0, a, 1


But this is ok



1, a, 1

1, a, 1

0, b, 1


I have looked around pretty heavily and the opposite of this is possible
with unique constraints, but I can't find anything that works for this.
Check constraints will only look at the row in question, and won't take into account the entire table's entries like a unique constraint would.



Is this even possible? Or is this now out of the realms of Postgres functionality, and must be done in-application.







postgresql constraint





share







New contributor




JDGale8 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share







New contributor




JDGale8 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share



share






New contributor




JDGale8 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 8 mins ago









JDGale8JDGale8

1




1




New contributor




JDGale8 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





JDGale8 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






JDGale8 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Why is one valid and the other is not?

    – Michael Kutz
    2 mins ago



















  • Why is one valid and the other is not?

    – Michael Kutz
    2 mins ago

















Why is one valid and the other is not?

– Michael Kutz
2 mins ago





Why is one valid and the other is not?

– Michael Kutz
2 mins ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






JDGale8 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f231296%2fis-there-such-thing-as-the-opposite-of-unique-constraint%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








JDGale8 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















JDGale8 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













JDGale8 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












JDGale8 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f231296%2fis-there-such-thing-as-the-opposite-of-unique-constraint%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Discografia di Klaus Schulze Indice Album in studio | Album dal vivo | Singoli | Antologie | Colonne...

Lupi Siderali Indice Storia | Organizzazione | La Tredicesima Compagnia | Aspetto | Membri Importanti...

Armoriale delle famiglie italiane (Car) Indice Armi | Bibliografia | Menu di navigazioneBlasone...