Work done in the presence of gravityHaving trouble understanding the work-energy principle intuitivelyWhy...
Icon at Subject-line scrlttr2
Can a player sacrifice a creature after declaring that creature as blocker while taking lethal damage?
Allow console draw poker game to output more hands
What is a good way to explain how a character can produce flames from their body?
How to change a .eps figure to standalone class?
What species should be used for storage of human minds?
Possible issue with my W4 and tax return
Why did Luke use his left hand to shoot?
What are some ways of extending a description of a scenery?
How can I handle players killing my NPC outside of combat?
How to not let the Identify spell spoil everything?
Co-worker sabotaging/undoing my work (software development)
How can I give a Ranger advantage on a check due to Favored Enemy without spoiling the story for the player?
The No-Straight Maze
Work done in the presence of gravity
Is `Object` a function in javascript?
How to write cases in LaTeX?
Why did Ylvis use "go" instead of "say" in phrases like "Dog goes 'woof'"?
Count repetitions of an array
Does it take energy to move something in a circle?
Does the US government have any planning in place to ensure there's no shortages of food, fuel, steel and other commodities?
What can I do to encourage my players to use their consumables?
Is there a non trivial covering of the Klein bottle by the Klein bottle
Are all power cords made equal?
Work done in the presence of gravity
Having trouble understanding the work-energy principle intuitivelyWhy doesn't the potential energy of any object equal 0Why does a conservative force return the work done against it by a body to that body?when an object is lifted (at a constant velocity) shouldn't the work done on the object be zero?What exactly is work?Work done by gravity on falling object does not seem to equal change in mechanical energyIs work done against a field when the forces match?Work done by gravity on an object on a slopeThe derivation and formula to calculate Potential Energy seems quite confusing?why work done by spring is negative eventhough KE increases?
$begingroup$
Consider a system where a block is to be raised from the ground to a height of 1 meter above the ground. It is given that when the force acting on the block and its displacement act in the same sense, the block gains energy. On the other hand, when both quantities act in opposite senses, the block loses energy.
Back to our example. At the ground reference level, let's assume the energy of the block is zero (no potential energy and no kinetic energy). As the block rises towards the 1-m height, it is acted upon by two equal and opposite forces: the lifting force and weight. The lifting force and the displacement are in the same sense so energy is gained by the block. However, weight and displacement act in opposite senses so the block loses an amount of energy equal to that supplied by the lifting force. Now, the block is at 1-m height with zero net gain in energy.
The question is: The gravitational potential energy of the block clearly increased since there was a change in elevation. However, we assumed in the previous paragraph that the block did not gain or lose any energy. So where is this energy coming from?
newtonian-mechanics energy newtonian-gravity work
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a system where a block is to be raised from the ground to a height of 1 meter above the ground. It is given that when the force acting on the block and its displacement act in the same sense, the block gains energy. On the other hand, when both quantities act in opposite senses, the block loses energy.
Back to our example. At the ground reference level, let's assume the energy of the block is zero (no potential energy and no kinetic energy). As the block rises towards the 1-m height, it is acted upon by two equal and opposite forces: the lifting force and weight. The lifting force and the displacement are in the same sense so energy is gained by the block. However, weight and displacement act in opposite senses so the block loses an amount of energy equal to that supplied by the lifting force. Now, the block is at 1-m height with zero net gain in energy.
The question is: The gravitational potential energy of the block clearly increased since there was a change in elevation. However, we assumed in the previous paragraph that the block did not gain or lose any energy. So where is this energy coming from?
newtonian-mechanics energy newtonian-gravity work
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a system where a block is to be raised from the ground to a height of 1 meter above the ground. It is given that when the force acting on the block and its displacement act in the same sense, the block gains energy. On the other hand, when both quantities act in opposite senses, the block loses energy.
Back to our example. At the ground reference level, let's assume the energy of the block is zero (no potential energy and no kinetic energy). As the block rises towards the 1-m height, it is acted upon by two equal and opposite forces: the lifting force and weight. The lifting force and the displacement are in the same sense so energy is gained by the block. However, weight and displacement act in opposite senses so the block loses an amount of energy equal to that supplied by the lifting force. Now, the block is at 1-m height with zero net gain in energy.
The question is: The gravitational potential energy of the block clearly increased since there was a change in elevation. However, we assumed in the previous paragraph that the block did not gain or lose any energy. So where is this energy coming from?
newtonian-mechanics energy newtonian-gravity work
$endgroup$
Consider a system where a block is to be raised from the ground to a height of 1 meter above the ground. It is given that when the force acting on the block and its displacement act in the same sense, the block gains energy. On the other hand, when both quantities act in opposite senses, the block loses energy.
Back to our example. At the ground reference level, let's assume the energy of the block is zero (no potential energy and no kinetic energy). As the block rises towards the 1-m height, it is acted upon by two equal and opposite forces: the lifting force and weight. The lifting force and the displacement are in the same sense so energy is gained by the block. However, weight and displacement act in opposite senses so the block loses an amount of energy equal to that supplied by the lifting force. Now, the block is at 1-m height with zero net gain in energy.
The question is: The gravitational potential energy of the block clearly increased since there was a change in elevation. However, we assumed in the previous paragraph that the block did not gain or lose any energy. So where is this energy coming from?
newtonian-mechanics energy newtonian-gravity work
newtonian-mechanics energy newtonian-gravity work
edited 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦
105k121901202
105k121901202
asked 5 hours ago
Chris RizkChris Rizk
334
334
add a comment |
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This problem is more likely to deal with the way questions would be posed to you, I guess. Because I do not think you understood work done incorrectly. Except that, work done is only dealing with a change in energy.
Consider a block at rest on the floor (with potential energy being zero - this is a matter of convenience, since we will only measure a change in energy at the end). When we raise the block and keep it at rest at some height $h$ above the ground, and it remains at rest, it will not have any potential energy - because I have raised it (counteracting gravity).
If the body had potential energy, it would have immediately transformed into kinetic energy and would have been falling. This happens only when I released it from rest.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The work done by gravity is thought of as change in potential energy because, unlike the lifting force, the gravitational force is conservative. I recommend you to look at these links:
Similar question in different forum
Conservative force page on Wikipedia
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You seem to have a misconception. Work done is not the change in total energy. Work done is the change in kinetic energy only.
$$W=Delta E_k$$
So, as you point out, since they're equal and opposite forces, no kinetic energy is gained. In fact, the block was at rest at the beginning and it is at rest when lifted.
It is a common misconception year by year. Usually badly explained. But the work-energy theorem states that work equals change in KE, only KE.
Then what? Well, consider splitting the work term in two parts: work done by conservative forces and work done by non-conservative forces, i.e. $W=W_C+W_{NC}$
Only the conservative forces allow writing $W_C=-Delta E_p$, and the sign matters.
Gravity is conservative. Your force is not, even if you're compensating it temporarily.
Consequently, you have
$$Delta E_k = W_C + W_{NC} = -Delta E_p + W_{NC}$$
Or, if you move all energies to the left:
$$Delta E_k + Delta E_p = W_{NC}$$
That's mechanical energy:
$$Delta E_m=W_{NC}$$
If there are no non-conservative forces, $Delta E_m=0$ and energy is conserved, hence the name.
When energy is not conserved, it is because there's some non-conservative force changing it. Especially friction, that's teh most frequent.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In order to start the block moving from rest it is necessary to exert, at minimum, an upward force greater than the downward force of gravity. Once you get the block moving the upward force can be reduced to equal the downward force of gravity. Although the net force is now zero, the block continues upward at constant velocity (and constant kinetic energy).The upward force is in the same direction as the displacement of the block so work on the block is positive, and the block gains gravitational potential energy.
Just prior to reaching the 1 meter height, you reduce the upward force to slightly less than the downward force of gravity. The block now decelerates. The net force is downward but the displacement continues upward. Therefore the work being done on the block is negative (it loses kinetic energy) but its potential energy continues to increase as long as the motion is upward. If the block velocity is zero at 1 meter, the loss of kinetic energy at the end equals the gain at the beginning so that the total change in kinetic energy when it reaches 1 meter is zero. The block has gained only gravitational potential energy.
Now you can do one of two things.
You can release the block allowing it to free fall. The downward force of gravity is in the same direction as the displacement so gravity is doing positive work on the block giving it kinetic energy. However, at the same time, the block is losing an equal amount of gravitational potential energy. When it reaches the ground all the potential energy is now kinetic energy.
Instead of releasing the block you can also lower it by reducing your upward force to slightly less than the gravitational downward force. Once the block starts moving downward you can increase the upward force to equal the gravitational force so the block moves downward at constant velocity. The force you exert is now upward but the displacement of the block is downward, so the work done on the block is negative (the block is losing gravitational potential energy).
Before the block reaches the ground you can increase the upward force to slightly more than the downward force of gravity causing the block to decelerate so that its velocity is zero when it reaches the ground, at which point it possesses neither gravitational potential energy or kinetic energy.
In the first scenario (dropping the block) there is merely a conversion of gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy when it reaches the ground. That kinetic energy is the result of gravity doing work on the block. But the original potential energy was due to you doing work on the block.
In the second scenario (lowering the block), work is done by the block on you and it loses gravitational potential energy.
Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How can the both forces be equal and opposite.
if the forces are equal and opposite then they will cancel each other route and no displacement would be possible.
here are the weight is a constant force of gravity which acts downwards always and the force by the external agent is the one that increases the energy of the body.
And this external force must be greater than gravity.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Consider that the block is moving upward at a constant speed and two balanced forces are acting on it. The block will continue to move at the same speed under the effect of the two equal and opposite forces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Rizk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462831%2fwork-done-in-the-presence-of-gravity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This problem is more likely to deal with the way questions would be posed to you, I guess. Because I do not think you understood work done incorrectly. Except that, work done is only dealing with a change in energy.
Consider a block at rest on the floor (with potential energy being zero - this is a matter of convenience, since we will only measure a change in energy at the end). When we raise the block and keep it at rest at some height $h$ above the ground, and it remains at rest, it will not have any potential energy - because I have raised it (counteracting gravity).
If the body had potential energy, it would have immediately transformed into kinetic energy and would have been falling. This happens only when I released it from rest.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This problem is more likely to deal with the way questions would be posed to you, I guess. Because I do not think you understood work done incorrectly. Except that, work done is only dealing with a change in energy.
Consider a block at rest on the floor (with potential energy being zero - this is a matter of convenience, since we will only measure a change in energy at the end). When we raise the block and keep it at rest at some height $h$ above the ground, and it remains at rest, it will not have any potential energy - because I have raised it (counteracting gravity).
If the body had potential energy, it would have immediately transformed into kinetic energy and would have been falling. This happens only when I released it from rest.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This problem is more likely to deal with the way questions would be posed to you, I guess. Because I do not think you understood work done incorrectly. Except that, work done is only dealing with a change in energy.
Consider a block at rest on the floor (with potential energy being zero - this is a matter of convenience, since we will only measure a change in energy at the end). When we raise the block and keep it at rest at some height $h$ above the ground, and it remains at rest, it will not have any potential energy - because I have raised it (counteracting gravity).
If the body had potential energy, it would have immediately transformed into kinetic energy and would have been falling. This happens only when I released it from rest.
$endgroup$
This problem is more likely to deal with the way questions would be posed to you, I guess. Because I do not think you understood work done incorrectly. Except that, work done is only dealing with a change in energy.
Consider a block at rest on the floor (with potential energy being zero - this is a matter of convenience, since we will only measure a change in energy at the end). When we raise the block and keep it at rest at some height $h$ above the ground, and it remains at rest, it will not have any potential energy - because I have raised it (counteracting gravity).
If the body had potential energy, it would have immediately transformed into kinetic energy and would have been falling. This happens only when I released it from rest.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
KV18KV18
550312
550312
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The work done by gravity is thought of as change in potential energy because, unlike the lifting force, the gravitational force is conservative. I recommend you to look at these links:
Similar question in different forum
Conservative force page on Wikipedia
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The work done by gravity is thought of as change in potential energy because, unlike the lifting force, the gravitational force is conservative. I recommend you to look at these links:
Similar question in different forum
Conservative force page on Wikipedia
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The work done by gravity is thought of as change in potential energy because, unlike the lifting force, the gravitational force is conservative. I recommend you to look at these links:
Similar question in different forum
Conservative force page on Wikipedia
New contributor
$endgroup$
The work done by gravity is thought of as change in potential energy because, unlike the lifting force, the gravitational force is conservative. I recommend you to look at these links:
Similar question in different forum
Conservative force page on Wikipedia
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Martin Vít VavříkMartin Vít Vavřík
113
113
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You seem to have a misconception. Work done is not the change in total energy. Work done is the change in kinetic energy only.
$$W=Delta E_k$$
So, as you point out, since they're equal and opposite forces, no kinetic energy is gained. In fact, the block was at rest at the beginning and it is at rest when lifted.
It is a common misconception year by year. Usually badly explained. But the work-energy theorem states that work equals change in KE, only KE.
Then what? Well, consider splitting the work term in two parts: work done by conservative forces and work done by non-conservative forces, i.e. $W=W_C+W_{NC}$
Only the conservative forces allow writing $W_C=-Delta E_p$, and the sign matters.
Gravity is conservative. Your force is not, even if you're compensating it temporarily.
Consequently, you have
$$Delta E_k = W_C + W_{NC} = -Delta E_p + W_{NC}$$
Or, if you move all energies to the left:
$$Delta E_k + Delta E_p = W_{NC}$$
That's mechanical energy:
$$Delta E_m=W_{NC}$$
If there are no non-conservative forces, $Delta E_m=0$ and energy is conserved, hence the name.
When energy is not conserved, it is because there's some non-conservative force changing it. Especially friction, that's teh most frequent.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You seem to have a misconception. Work done is not the change in total energy. Work done is the change in kinetic energy only.
$$W=Delta E_k$$
So, as you point out, since they're equal and opposite forces, no kinetic energy is gained. In fact, the block was at rest at the beginning and it is at rest when lifted.
It is a common misconception year by year. Usually badly explained. But the work-energy theorem states that work equals change in KE, only KE.
Then what? Well, consider splitting the work term in two parts: work done by conservative forces and work done by non-conservative forces, i.e. $W=W_C+W_{NC}$
Only the conservative forces allow writing $W_C=-Delta E_p$, and the sign matters.
Gravity is conservative. Your force is not, even if you're compensating it temporarily.
Consequently, you have
$$Delta E_k = W_C + W_{NC} = -Delta E_p + W_{NC}$$
Or, if you move all energies to the left:
$$Delta E_k + Delta E_p = W_{NC}$$
That's mechanical energy:
$$Delta E_m=W_{NC}$$
If there are no non-conservative forces, $Delta E_m=0$ and energy is conserved, hence the name.
When energy is not conserved, it is because there's some non-conservative force changing it. Especially friction, that's teh most frequent.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You seem to have a misconception. Work done is not the change in total energy. Work done is the change in kinetic energy only.
$$W=Delta E_k$$
So, as you point out, since they're equal and opposite forces, no kinetic energy is gained. In fact, the block was at rest at the beginning and it is at rest when lifted.
It is a common misconception year by year. Usually badly explained. But the work-energy theorem states that work equals change in KE, only KE.
Then what? Well, consider splitting the work term in two parts: work done by conservative forces and work done by non-conservative forces, i.e. $W=W_C+W_{NC}$
Only the conservative forces allow writing $W_C=-Delta E_p$, and the sign matters.
Gravity is conservative. Your force is not, even if you're compensating it temporarily.
Consequently, you have
$$Delta E_k = W_C + W_{NC} = -Delta E_p + W_{NC}$$
Or, if you move all energies to the left:
$$Delta E_k + Delta E_p = W_{NC}$$
That's mechanical energy:
$$Delta E_m=W_{NC}$$
If there are no non-conservative forces, $Delta E_m=0$ and energy is conserved, hence the name.
When energy is not conserved, it is because there's some non-conservative force changing it. Especially friction, that's teh most frequent.
$endgroup$
You seem to have a misconception. Work done is not the change in total energy. Work done is the change in kinetic energy only.
$$W=Delta E_k$$
So, as you point out, since they're equal and opposite forces, no kinetic energy is gained. In fact, the block was at rest at the beginning and it is at rest when lifted.
It is a common misconception year by year. Usually badly explained. But the work-energy theorem states that work equals change in KE, only KE.
Then what? Well, consider splitting the work term in two parts: work done by conservative forces and work done by non-conservative forces, i.e. $W=W_C+W_{NC}$
Only the conservative forces allow writing $W_C=-Delta E_p$, and the sign matters.
Gravity is conservative. Your force is not, even if you're compensating it temporarily.
Consequently, you have
$$Delta E_k = W_C + W_{NC} = -Delta E_p + W_{NC}$$
Or, if you move all energies to the left:
$$Delta E_k + Delta E_p = W_{NC}$$
That's mechanical energy:
$$Delta E_m=W_{NC}$$
If there are no non-conservative forces, $Delta E_m=0$ and energy is conserved, hence the name.
When energy is not conserved, it is because there's some non-conservative force changing it. Especially friction, that's teh most frequent.
answered 1 hour ago
FGSUZFGSUZ
4,4642724
4,4642724
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In order to start the block moving from rest it is necessary to exert, at minimum, an upward force greater than the downward force of gravity. Once you get the block moving the upward force can be reduced to equal the downward force of gravity. Although the net force is now zero, the block continues upward at constant velocity (and constant kinetic energy).The upward force is in the same direction as the displacement of the block so work on the block is positive, and the block gains gravitational potential energy.
Just prior to reaching the 1 meter height, you reduce the upward force to slightly less than the downward force of gravity. The block now decelerates. The net force is downward but the displacement continues upward. Therefore the work being done on the block is negative (it loses kinetic energy) but its potential energy continues to increase as long as the motion is upward. If the block velocity is zero at 1 meter, the loss of kinetic energy at the end equals the gain at the beginning so that the total change in kinetic energy when it reaches 1 meter is zero. The block has gained only gravitational potential energy.
Now you can do one of two things.
You can release the block allowing it to free fall. The downward force of gravity is in the same direction as the displacement so gravity is doing positive work on the block giving it kinetic energy. However, at the same time, the block is losing an equal amount of gravitational potential energy. When it reaches the ground all the potential energy is now kinetic energy.
Instead of releasing the block you can also lower it by reducing your upward force to slightly less than the gravitational downward force. Once the block starts moving downward you can increase the upward force to equal the gravitational force so the block moves downward at constant velocity. The force you exert is now upward but the displacement of the block is downward, so the work done on the block is negative (the block is losing gravitational potential energy).
Before the block reaches the ground you can increase the upward force to slightly more than the downward force of gravity causing the block to decelerate so that its velocity is zero when it reaches the ground, at which point it possesses neither gravitational potential energy or kinetic energy.
In the first scenario (dropping the block) there is merely a conversion of gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy when it reaches the ground. That kinetic energy is the result of gravity doing work on the block. But the original potential energy was due to you doing work on the block.
In the second scenario (lowering the block), work is done by the block on you and it loses gravitational potential energy.
Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In order to start the block moving from rest it is necessary to exert, at minimum, an upward force greater than the downward force of gravity. Once you get the block moving the upward force can be reduced to equal the downward force of gravity. Although the net force is now zero, the block continues upward at constant velocity (and constant kinetic energy).The upward force is in the same direction as the displacement of the block so work on the block is positive, and the block gains gravitational potential energy.
Just prior to reaching the 1 meter height, you reduce the upward force to slightly less than the downward force of gravity. The block now decelerates. The net force is downward but the displacement continues upward. Therefore the work being done on the block is negative (it loses kinetic energy) but its potential energy continues to increase as long as the motion is upward. If the block velocity is zero at 1 meter, the loss of kinetic energy at the end equals the gain at the beginning so that the total change in kinetic energy when it reaches 1 meter is zero. The block has gained only gravitational potential energy.
Now you can do one of two things.
You can release the block allowing it to free fall. The downward force of gravity is in the same direction as the displacement so gravity is doing positive work on the block giving it kinetic energy. However, at the same time, the block is losing an equal amount of gravitational potential energy. When it reaches the ground all the potential energy is now kinetic energy.
Instead of releasing the block you can also lower it by reducing your upward force to slightly less than the gravitational downward force. Once the block starts moving downward you can increase the upward force to equal the gravitational force so the block moves downward at constant velocity. The force you exert is now upward but the displacement of the block is downward, so the work done on the block is negative (the block is losing gravitational potential energy).
Before the block reaches the ground you can increase the upward force to slightly more than the downward force of gravity causing the block to decelerate so that its velocity is zero when it reaches the ground, at which point it possesses neither gravitational potential energy or kinetic energy.
In the first scenario (dropping the block) there is merely a conversion of gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy when it reaches the ground. That kinetic energy is the result of gravity doing work on the block. But the original potential energy was due to you doing work on the block.
In the second scenario (lowering the block), work is done by the block on you and it loses gravitational potential energy.
Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In order to start the block moving from rest it is necessary to exert, at minimum, an upward force greater than the downward force of gravity. Once you get the block moving the upward force can be reduced to equal the downward force of gravity. Although the net force is now zero, the block continues upward at constant velocity (and constant kinetic energy).The upward force is in the same direction as the displacement of the block so work on the block is positive, and the block gains gravitational potential energy.
Just prior to reaching the 1 meter height, you reduce the upward force to slightly less than the downward force of gravity. The block now decelerates. The net force is downward but the displacement continues upward. Therefore the work being done on the block is negative (it loses kinetic energy) but its potential energy continues to increase as long as the motion is upward. If the block velocity is zero at 1 meter, the loss of kinetic energy at the end equals the gain at the beginning so that the total change in kinetic energy when it reaches 1 meter is zero. The block has gained only gravitational potential energy.
Now you can do one of two things.
You can release the block allowing it to free fall. The downward force of gravity is in the same direction as the displacement so gravity is doing positive work on the block giving it kinetic energy. However, at the same time, the block is losing an equal amount of gravitational potential energy. When it reaches the ground all the potential energy is now kinetic energy.
Instead of releasing the block you can also lower it by reducing your upward force to slightly less than the gravitational downward force. Once the block starts moving downward you can increase the upward force to equal the gravitational force so the block moves downward at constant velocity. The force you exert is now upward but the displacement of the block is downward, so the work done on the block is negative (the block is losing gravitational potential energy).
Before the block reaches the ground you can increase the upward force to slightly more than the downward force of gravity causing the block to decelerate so that its velocity is zero when it reaches the ground, at which point it possesses neither gravitational potential energy or kinetic energy.
In the first scenario (dropping the block) there is merely a conversion of gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy when it reaches the ground. That kinetic energy is the result of gravity doing work on the block. But the original potential energy was due to you doing work on the block.
In the second scenario (lowering the block), work is done by the block on you and it loses gravitational potential energy.
Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
In order to start the block moving from rest it is necessary to exert, at minimum, an upward force greater than the downward force of gravity. Once you get the block moving the upward force can be reduced to equal the downward force of gravity. Although the net force is now zero, the block continues upward at constant velocity (and constant kinetic energy).The upward force is in the same direction as the displacement of the block so work on the block is positive, and the block gains gravitational potential energy.
Just prior to reaching the 1 meter height, you reduce the upward force to slightly less than the downward force of gravity. The block now decelerates. The net force is downward but the displacement continues upward. Therefore the work being done on the block is negative (it loses kinetic energy) but its potential energy continues to increase as long as the motion is upward. If the block velocity is zero at 1 meter, the loss of kinetic energy at the end equals the gain at the beginning so that the total change in kinetic energy when it reaches 1 meter is zero. The block has gained only gravitational potential energy.
Now you can do one of two things.
You can release the block allowing it to free fall. The downward force of gravity is in the same direction as the displacement so gravity is doing positive work on the block giving it kinetic energy. However, at the same time, the block is losing an equal amount of gravitational potential energy. When it reaches the ground all the potential energy is now kinetic energy.
Instead of releasing the block you can also lower it by reducing your upward force to slightly less than the gravitational downward force. Once the block starts moving downward you can increase the upward force to equal the gravitational force so the block moves downward at constant velocity. The force you exert is now upward but the displacement of the block is downward, so the work done on the block is negative (the block is losing gravitational potential energy).
Before the block reaches the ground you can increase the upward force to slightly more than the downward force of gravity causing the block to decelerate so that its velocity is zero when it reaches the ground, at which point it possesses neither gravitational potential energy or kinetic energy.
In the first scenario (dropping the block) there is merely a conversion of gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy when it reaches the ground. That kinetic energy is the result of gravity doing work on the block. But the original potential energy was due to you doing work on the block.
In the second scenario (lowering the block), work is done by the block on you and it loses gravitational potential energy.
Hope this helps.
answered 2 mins ago
Bob DBob D
3,0432214
3,0432214
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How can the both forces be equal and opposite.
if the forces are equal and opposite then they will cancel each other route and no displacement would be possible.
here are the weight is a constant force of gravity which acts downwards always and the force by the external agent is the one that increases the energy of the body.
And this external force must be greater than gravity.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Consider that the block is moving upward at a constant speed and two balanced forces are acting on it. The block will continue to move at the same speed under the effect of the two equal and opposite forces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Rizk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How can the both forces be equal and opposite.
if the forces are equal and opposite then they will cancel each other route and no displacement would be possible.
here are the weight is a constant force of gravity which acts downwards always and the force by the external agent is the one that increases the energy of the body.
And this external force must be greater than gravity.
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Consider that the block is moving upward at a constant speed and two balanced forces are acting on it. The block will continue to move at the same speed under the effect of the two equal and opposite forces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Rizk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How can the both forces be equal and opposite.
if the forces are equal and opposite then they will cancel each other route and no displacement would be possible.
here are the weight is a constant force of gravity which acts downwards always and the force by the external agent is the one that increases the energy of the body.
And this external force must be greater than gravity.
New contributor
$endgroup$
How can the both forces be equal and opposite.
if the forces are equal and opposite then they will cancel each other route and no displacement would be possible.
here are the weight is a constant force of gravity which acts downwards always and the force by the external agent is the one that increases the energy of the body.
And this external force must be greater than gravity.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 4 hours ago
Mohit JaniMohit Jani
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Consider that the block is moving upward at a constant speed and two balanced forces are acting on it. The block will continue to move at the same speed under the effect of the two equal and opposite forces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Rizk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Consider that the block is moving upward at a constant speed and two balanced forces are acting on it. The block will continue to move at the same speed under the effect of the two equal and opposite forces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Rizk
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Consider that the block is moving upward at a constant speed and two balanced forces are acting on it. The block will continue to move at the same speed under the effect of the two equal and opposite forces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Rizk
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Consider that the block is moving upward at a constant speed and two balanced forces are acting on it. The block will continue to move at the same speed under the effect of the two equal and opposite forces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Rizk
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462831%2fwork-done-in-the-presence-of-gravity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown