What's the oldest plausible frozen specimen for a Jurassic Park style story-line?How big a black hole is...

Where does documentation like business and software requirement spec docs fit in an agile project?

Minimum Viable Product for RTS game?

Illustrator to chemdraw

Is it possible to rotate the Isolines on a Surface Using `MeshFunction`?

Why do neural networks need so many examples to perform?

Why does 0.-5 evaluate to -5?

How to write cases in LaTeX?

Taking an academic pseudonym?

Co-worker sabotaging/undoing my work

Is it possible to detect 100% of SQLi with a simple regex?

What is the draw frequency for 3 consecutive games (same players; amateur level)?

Reading Mishnayos without understanding

Can a player sacrifice a creature after declaring that creature as blocker while taking lethal damage?

The No-Straight Maze

Should a new user just default to LinearModelFit (vs Fit)

Sharepoint metadata URL

Is `Object` a function in javascript?

What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry gun on board?

What are some ways of extending a description of a scenery?

Renting a 2CV in France

How to deal with an underperforming subordinate?

Does it take energy to move something in a circle?

How to not let the Identify spell spoil everything?

Single-row INSERT...SELECT much slower than separate SELECT



What's the oldest plausible frozen specimen for a Jurassic Park style story-line?


How big a black hole is needed for this story?What's a plausible explanation for a space faring civilization with a “16th century” culture?What's the longest plausible orbital period for a habitable planet with a 3:2 spin-orbit resonance?Is this a realistic creation story for a matriarchal society?What's a good name for this technology?What's necessary for this stratified, flood-prone city to be plausible?Creating a Cold Super-Venus for a storyWhat's the most plausible way to bio-engineer an underground ecosystem, without photosynthesis, to produce oxygen?Designing a plausible Corinthian-style modern combat helmetWhat might be a plausible explanation for the drastic lowering of global temperatures?













2












$begingroup$


We've found all sorts of interesting stuff in arctic ice & permafrost around the world.



Bacteria & the like far older than the more media friendly mammoth specimens have been found, living bacteria has been found in ice cores as old as 420,000 years.



Obviously I'm not thinking about living specimens



The ebb & flow of the ice & permafrost through our various ice ages are probably a factor in what might plausibly have survived unthawed to be found & by extension where (not all dinosaurs lived exclusively in warm climates) & when any particular species was found.



So is a frozen dinosaur in any way plausible, how about a neanderthal?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    We've found all sorts of interesting stuff in arctic ice & permafrost around the world.



    Bacteria & the like far older than the more media friendly mammoth specimens have been found, living bacteria has been found in ice cores as old as 420,000 years.



    Obviously I'm not thinking about living specimens



    The ebb & flow of the ice & permafrost through our various ice ages are probably a factor in what might plausibly have survived unthawed to be found & by extension where (not all dinosaurs lived exclusively in warm climates) & when any particular species was found.



    So is a frozen dinosaur in any way plausible, how about a neanderthal?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      We've found all sorts of interesting stuff in arctic ice & permafrost around the world.



      Bacteria & the like far older than the more media friendly mammoth specimens have been found, living bacteria has been found in ice cores as old as 420,000 years.



      Obviously I'm not thinking about living specimens



      The ebb & flow of the ice & permafrost through our various ice ages are probably a factor in what might plausibly have survived unthawed to be found & by extension where (not all dinosaurs lived exclusively in warm climates) & when any particular species was found.



      So is a frozen dinosaur in any way plausible, how about a neanderthal?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      We've found all sorts of interesting stuff in arctic ice & permafrost around the world.



      Bacteria & the like far older than the more media friendly mammoth specimens have been found, living bacteria has been found in ice cores as old as 420,000 years.



      Obviously I'm not thinking about living specimens



      The ebb & flow of the ice & permafrost through our various ice ages are probably a factor in what might plausibly have survived unthawed to be found & by extension where (not all dinosaurs lived exclusively in warm climates) & when any particular species was found.



      So is a frozen dinosaur in any way plausible, how about a neanderthal?







      science-based reality-check climate






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago







      Pelinore

















      asked 1 hour ago









      PelinorePelinore

      2,440520




      2,440520






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Permanent ice caps have not been a constant during Earth history. For example we know that in the past the poles were free from ice.



          Therefore the oldest possible frozen sample is as old as the oldest permanent ice caps or frozen terrain on Earth. Anything that got frozen before that time has been thawed in the meantime.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Damn good point, guess I was wrong about that being a question for another day, it actually goes to the core of the question.. hmm, the question may need a rejig, or that might just be the answer ~ 35 million years ago was the last time the ice caps weren't there.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago












          • $begingroup$
            Dinasaurs are off the table then ~ they went extinct 65 million years ago, neanderthals are a mere 40 thousand years ago so they're plausible.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: The Antarctic ice sheet formed about 35 to 45 million years ago. The Greenland ice cap is less than 20 million years old. Anyway, the Mesozoic ended 66 mya, so neither ice sheet can contain frozen non-avian dinosaurs.
            $endgroup$
            – AlexP
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah! given their distribution neanderthals are also off the menu, oh well.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            52 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Pelinore its still possible for neanderthal, that range is just our best estimate based on fossil and artifact remains, of course, it will not preclude the random lost straggler. It will be an earlier neanderthal though the ice cap maximum would have kept them too far from existing ice caps.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            35 mins ago





















          1












          $begingroup$

          The oldest frozen specimens would likely be roughly 15-30 million years old and would be whatever critters were on Antarctica during the Oligocene or early Miocene.



          Around that time, Antarctica finished its split from other land masses with the opening of the Drake Passage between it and South America, allowing the Antarctic Circumpolar Current to begin keeping warmer waters away and permanently freezing the continent into what we know today.



          Until it fully froze, conifer forests and steppes covered the continent, and if Antarctic fauna were anything like the rest of the world it was dominated by a mix of critters that were vaguely similar to today's large mammals, rodents, and sea life.



          So, it looks like your frozen Oligocene Park will probably be filled with odd-looking pine trees and horses and mice with weird snouts. Not as awe-inspiring as a T-Rex, but still pretty cool.





          As for finding frozen Neanderthals, it's possible but unlikely. In order to be found frozen, they would have needed to die in an area of permafrost that has been unchanged for the last 40-50,000 years, and their known range doesn't have many options for that. However, we did find a 5,000 year old mummy frozen in the Alps, so anything's possible.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Skimming the images produced by a oligocene animals Google search I think I could live with that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            15 mins ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: I'd imagine visiting Oligocene Park would give roughly the same feeling of the early explorers of Australia.
            $endgroup$
            – Giter
            7 mins ago













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139997%2fwhats-the-oldest-plausible-frozen-specimen-for-a-jurassic-park-style-story-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Permanent ice caps have not been a constant during Earth history. For example we know that in the past the poles were free from ice.



          Therefore the oldest possible frozen sample is as old as the oldest permanent ice caps or frozen terrain on Earth. Anything that got frozen before that time has been thawed in the meantime.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Damn good point, guess I was wrong about that being a question for another day, it actually goes to the core of the question.. hmm, the question may need a rejig, or that might just be the answer ~ 35 million years ago was the last time the ice caps weren't there.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago












          • $begingroup$
            Dinasaurs are off the table then ~ they went extinct 65 million years ago, neanderthals are a mere 40 thousand years ago so they're plausible.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: The Antarctic ice sheet formed about 35 to 45 million years ago. The Greenland ice cap is less than 20 million years old. Anyway, the Mesozoic ended 66 mya, so neither ice sheet can contain frozen non-avian dinosaurs.
            $endgroup$
            – AlexP
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah! given their distribution neanderthals are also off the menu, oh well.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            52 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Pelinore its still possible for neanderthal, that range is just our best estimate based on fossil and artifact remains, of course, it will not preclude the random lost straggler. It will be an earlier neanderthal though the ice cap maximum would have kept them too far from existing ice caps.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            35 mins ago


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Permanent ice caps have not been a constant during Earth history. For example we know that in the past the poles were free from ice.



          Therefore the oldest possible frozen sample is as old as the oldest permanent ice caps or frozen terrain on Earth. Anything that got frozen before that time has been thawed in the meantime.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Damn good point, guess I was wrong about that being a question for another day, it actually goes to the core of the question.. hmm, the question may need a rejig, or that might just be the answer ~ 35 million years ago was the last time the ice caps weren't there.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago












          • $begingroup$
            Dinasaurs are off the table then ~ they went extinct 65 million years ago, neanderthals are a mere 40 thousand years ago so they're plausible.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: The Antarctic ice sheet formed about 35 to 45 million years ago. The Greenland ice cap is less than 20 million years old. Anyway, the Mesozoic ended 66 mya, so neither ice sheet can contain frozen non-avian dinosaurs.
            $endgroup$
            – AlexP
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah! given their distribution neanderthals are also off the menu, oh well.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            52 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Pelinore its still possible for neanderthal, that range is just our best estimate based on fossil and artifact remains, of course, it will not preclude the random lost straggler. It will be an earlier neanderthal though the ice cap maximum would have kept them too far from existing ice caps.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            35 mins ago
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Permanent ice caps have not been a constant during Earth history. For example we know that in the past the poles were free from ice.



          Therefore the oldest possible frozen sample is as old as the oldest permanent ice caps or frozen terrain on Earth. Anything that got frozen before that time has been thawed in the meantime.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Permanent ice caps have not been a constant during Earth history. For example we know that in the past the poles were free from ice.



          Therefore the oldest possible frozen sample is as old as the oldest permanent ice caps or frozen terrain on Earth. Anything that got frozen before that time has been thawed in the meantime.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          L.DutchL.Dutch

          84.9k28201415




          84.9k28201415












          • $begingroup$
            Damn good point, guess I was wrong about that being a question for another day, it actually goes to the core of the question.. hmm, the question may need a rejig, or that might just be the answer ~ 35 million years ago was the last time the ice caps weren't there.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago












          • $begingroup$
            Dinasaurs are off the table then ~ they went extinct 65 million years ago, neanderthals are a mere 40 thousand years ago so they're plausible.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: The Antarctic ice sheet formed about 35 to 45 million years ago. The Greenland ice cap is less than 20 million years old. Anyway, the Mesozoic ended 66 mya, so neither ice sheet can contain frozen non-avian dinosaurs.
            $endgroup$
            – AlexP
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah! given their distribution neanderthals are also off the menu, oh well.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            52 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Pelinore its still possible for neanderthal, that range is just our best estimate based on fossil and artifact remains, of course, it will not preclude the random lost straggler. It will be an earlier neanderthal though the ice cap maximum would have kept them too far from existing ice caps.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            35 mins ago




















          • $begingroup$
            Damn good point, guess I was wrong about that being a question for another day, it actually goes to the core of the question.. hmm, the question may need a rejig, or that might just be the answer ~ 35 million years ago was the last time the ice caps weren't there.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago












          • $begingroup$
            Dinasaurs are off the table then ~ they went extinct 65 million years ago, neanderthals are a mere 40 thousand years ago so they're plausible.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            1 hour ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: The Antarctic ice sheet formed about 35 to 45 million years ago. The Greenland ice cap is less than 20 million years old. Anyway, the Mesozoic ended 66 mya, so neither ice sheet can contain frozen non-avian dinosaurs.
            $endgroup$
            – AlexP
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah! given their distribution neanderthals are also off the menu, oh well.
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            52 mins ago












          • $begingroup$
            @Pelinore its still possible for neanderthal, that range is just our best estimate based on fossil and artifact remains, of course, it will not preclude the random lost straggler. It will be an earlier neanderthal though the ice cap maximum would have kept them too far from existing ice caps.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            35 mins ago


















          $begingroup$
          Damn good point, guess I was wrong about that being a question for another day, it actually goes to the core of the question.. hmm, the question may need a rejig, or that might just be the answer ~ 35 million years ago was the last time the ice caps weren't there.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          1 hour ago






          $begingroup$
          Damn good point, guess I was wrong about that being a question for another day, it actually goes to the core of the question.. hmm, the question may need a rejig, or that might just be the answer ~ 35 million years ago was the last time the ice caps weren't there.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          1 hour ago














          $begingroup$
          Dinasaurs are off the table then ~ they went extinct 65 million years ago, neanderthals are a mere 40 thousand years ago so they're plausible.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          1 hour ago






          $begingroup$
          Dinasaurs are off the table then ~ they went extinct 65 million years ago, neanderthals are a mere 40 thousand years ago so they're plausible.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          1 hour ago






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Pelinore: The Antarctic ice sheet formed about 35 to 45 million years ago. The Greenland ice cap is less than 20 million years old. Anyway, the Mesozoic ended 66 mya, so neither ice sheet can contain frozen non-avian dinosaurs.
          $endgroup$
          – AlexP
          1 hour ago




          $begingroup$
          @Pelinore: The Antarctic ice sheet formed about 35 to 45 million years ago. The Greenland ice cap is less than 20 million years old. Anyway, the Mesozoic ended 66 mya, so neither ice sheet can contain frozen non-avian dinosaurs.
          $endgroup$
          – AlexP
          1 hour ago












          $begingroup$
          Ah! given their distribution neanderthals are also off the menu, oh well.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          52 mins ago






          $begingroup$
          Ah! given their distribution neanderthals are also off the menu, oh well.
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          52 mins ago














          $begingroup$
          @Pelinore its still possible for neanderthal, that range is just our best estimate based on fossil and artifact remains, of course, it will not preclude the random lost straggler. It will be an earlier neanderthal though the ice cap maximum would have kept them too far from existing ice caps.
          $endgroup$
          – John
          35 mins ago






          $begingroup$
          @Pelinore its still possible for neanderthal, that range is just our best estimate based on fossil and artifact remains, of course, it will not preclude the random lost straggler. It will be an earlier neanderthal though the ice cap maximum would have kept them too far from existing ice caps.
          $endgroup$
          – John
          35 mins ago













          1












          $begingroup$

          The oldest frozen specimens would likely be roughly 15-30 million years old and would be whatever critters were on Antarctica during the Oligocene or early Miocene.



          Around that time, Antarctica finished its split from other land masses with the opening of the Drake Passage between it and South America, allowing the Antarctic Circumpolar Current to begin keeping warmer waters away and permanently freezing the continent into what we know today.



          Until it fully froze, conifer forests and steppes covered the continent, and if Antarctic fauna were anything like the rest of the world it was dominated by a mix of critters that were vaguely similar to today's large mammals, rodents, and sea life.



          So, it looks like your frozen Oligocene Park will probably be filled with odd-looking pine trees and horses and mice with weird snouts. Not as awe-inspiring as a T-Rex, but still pretty cool.





          As for finding frozen Neanderthals, it's possible but unlikely. In order to be found frozen, they would have needed to die in an area of permafrost that has been unchanged for the last 40-50,000 years, and their known range doesn't have many options for that. However, we did find a 5,000 year old mummy frozen in the Alps, so anything's possible.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Skimming the images produced by a oligocene animals Google search I think I could live with that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            15 mins ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: I'd imagine visiting Oligocene Park would give roughly the same feeling of the early explorers of Australia.
            $endgroup$
            – Giter
            7 mins ago


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The oldest frozen specimens would likely be roughly 15-30 million years old and would be whatever critters were on Antarctica during the Oligocene or early Miocene.



          Around that time, Antarctica finished its split from other land masses with the opening of the Drake Passage between it and South America, allowing the Antarctic Circumpolar Current to begin keeping warmer waters away and permanently freezing the continent into what we know today.



          Until it fully froze, conifer forests and steppes covered the continent, and if Antarctic fauna were anything like the rest of the world it was dominated by a mix of critters that were vaguely similar to today's large mammals, rodents, and sea life.



          So, it looks like your frozen Oligocene Park will probably be filled with odd-looking pine trees and horses and mice with weird snouts. Not as awe-inspiring as a T-Rex, but still pretty cool.





          As for finding frozen Neanderthals, it's possible but unlikely. In order to be found frozen, they would have needed to die in an area of permafrost that has been unchanged for the last 40-50,000 years, and their known range doesn't have many options for that. However, we did find a 5,000 year old mummy frozen in the Alps, so anything's possible.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Skimming the images produced by a oligocene animals Google search I think I could live with that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            15 mins ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: I'd imagine visiting Oligocene Park would give roughly the same feeling of the early explorers of Australia.
            $endgroup$
            – Giter
            7 mins ago
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The oldest frozen specimens would likely be roughly 15-30 million years old and would be whatever critters were on Antarctica during the Oligocene or early Miocene.



          Around that time, Antarctica finished its split from other land masses with the opening of the Drake Passage between it and South America, allowing the Antarctic Circumpolar Current to begin keeping warmer waters away and permanently freezing the continent into what we know today.



          Until it fully froze, conifer forests and steppes covered the continent, and if Antarctic fauna were anything like the rest of the world it was dominated by a mix of critters that were vaguely similar to today's large mammals, rodents, and sea life.



          So, it looks like your frozen Oligocene Park will probably be filled with odd-looking pine trees and horses and mice with weird snouts. Not as awe-inspiring as a T-Rex, but still pretty cool.





          As for finding frozen Neanderthals, it's possible but unlikely. In order to be found frozen, they would have needed to die in an area of permafrost that has been unchanged for the last 40-50,000 years, and their known range doesn't have many options for that. However, we did find a 5,000 year old mummy frozen in the Alps, so anything's possible.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The oldest frozen specimens would likely be roughly 15-30 million years old and would be whatever critters were on Antarctica during the Oligocene or early Miocene.



          Around that time, Antarctica finished its split from other land masses with the opening of the Drake Passage between it and South America, allowing the Antarctic Circumpolar Current to begin keeping warmer waters away and permanently freezing the continent into what we know today.



          Until it fully froze, conifer forests and steppes covered the continent, and if Antarctic fauna were anything like the rest of the world it was dominated by a mix of critters that were vaguely similar to today's large mammals, rodents, and sea life.



          So, it looks like your frozen Oligocene Park will probably be filled with odd-looking pine trees and horses and mice with weird snouts. Not as awe-inspiring as a T-Rex, but still pretty cool.





          As for finding frozen Neanderthals, it's possible but unlikely. In order to be found frozen, they would have needed to die in an area of permafrost that has been unchanged for the last 40-50,000 years, and their known range doesn't have many options for that. However, we did find a 5,000 year old mummy frozen in the Alps, so anything's possible.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 11 mins ago

























          answered 23 mins ago









          GiterGiter

          13.7k53241




          13.7k53241








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Skimming the images produced by a oligocene animals Google search I think I could live with that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            15 mins ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: I'd imagine visiting Oligocene Park would give roughly the same feeling of the early explorers of Australia.
            $endgroup$
            – Giter
            7 mins ago
















          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Skimming the images produced by a oligocene animals Google search I think I could live with that :)
            $endgroup$
            – Pelinore
            15 mins ago






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Pelinore: I'd imagine visiting Oligocene Park would give roughly the same feeling of the early explorers of Australia.
            $endgroup$
            – Giter
            7 mins ago










          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Skimming the images produced by a oligocene animals Google search I think I could live with that :)
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          15 mins ago




          $begingroup$
          Skimming the images produced by a oligocene animals Google search I think I could live with that :)
          $endgroup$
          – Pelinore
          15 mins ago




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Pelinore: I'd imagine visiting Oligocene Park would give roughly the same feeling of the early explorers of Australia.
          $endgroup$
          – Giter
          7 mins ago






          $begingroup$
          @Pelinore: I'd imagine visiting Oligocene Park would give roughly the same feeling of the early explorers of Australia.
          $endgroup$
          – Giter
          7 mins ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139997%2fwhats-the-oldest-plausible-frozen-specimen-for-a-jurassic-park-style-story-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Szabolcs (Ungheria) Altri progetti | Menu di navigazione48°10′14.56″N 21°29′33.14″E /...

          Discografia di Klaus Schulze Indice Album in studio | Album dal vivo | Singoli | Antologie | Colonne...

          How to make inet_server_addr() return localhost in spite of ::1/128RETURN NEXT in Postgres FunctionConnect to...