Why is perturbation theory used in quantum mechanics?Perturbation theoryPerturbation theory in quantum...

Taking an academic pseudonym?

Minimum Viable Product for RTS game?

Why can all solutions to the simple harmonic motion equation be written in terms of sines and cosines?

Sets which are both Sum-free and Product-free.

Is there any danger of my neighbor having my wife's signature?

Why is Shelob considered evil?

Is layered encryption more secure than long passwords?

Can a planet be tidally unlocked?

How can I differentiate duration vs starting time

How many copper coins fit inside a cubic foot?

PostGIS function to move a polygon to centre over new point coordinates

Why is perturbation theory used in quantum mechanics?

Does the double-bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?

Short story about a man betting a group he could tell a story, and one of them would disappear and the others would not notice

Boss asked me to sign a resignation paper without a date on it along with my new contract

Can I do anything else with aspersions other than cast them?

Trying to make a 3dplot

UK visa start date and Flight Depature Time

I am a loser when it comes to jobs, what possibilities do I have?

How to transport 10,000 terrestrial trolls across ocean fast?

bash aliases do not expand even with shopt expand_aliases

Why is quixotic not Quixotic (a proper adjective)?

Have any astronauts or cosmonauts died in space?

Distribution of sum of independent exponentials with random number of summands



Why is perturbation theory used in quantum mechanics?


Perturbation theoryPerturbation theory in quantum mechanics“Good” States In Degenerate Perturbation TheoryQuantum perturbation theory recommendationsIntuitions on perturbation theory?Degenerate perturbation theoryWhat is the point of degenerate perturbation theory in quantum mechanics?Kleinert's Variational Perturbation TheoryGriffiths's take on degenerate perturbation theoryAssumptions in basic perturbation theory













2












$begingroup$


I don't seem to understand what perturbation theory really is, and what it is needed for. Can someone please provide an explanation for what it is, and why it is needed in QM?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
    $endgroup$
    – flaudemus
    5 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This seems to be a side effect of an incomplete physics education. Perturbation theory is an incredibly broad set of techniques useful in all subfields of physics and much of applied mathematics at large. But often people are not introduced to it until a quantum mechanics course, probably because there's not enough time to look at nontrivial (i.e. no simple closed form solution) problems earlier in the curriculum, which would motivate introducing perturbation theory.
    $endgroup$
    – knzhou
    22 mins ago












  • $begingroup$
    As such this question ends up sounding like... "what is calculus and why is it introduced in quantum field theory class?", or "what is the quadratic formula and why is it useful for statistical mechanics?"
    $endgroup$
    – knzhou
    21 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$


I don't seem to understand what perturbation theory really is, and what it is needed for. Can someone please provide an explanation for what it is, and why it is needed in QM?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
    $endgroup$
    – flaudemus
    5 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This seems to be a side effect of an incomplete physics education. Perturbation theory is an incredibly broad set of techniques useful in all subfields of physics and much of applied mathematics at large. But often people are not introduced to it until a quantum mechanics course, probably because there's not enough time to look at nontrivial (i.e. no simple closed form solution) problems earlier in the curriculum, which would motivate introducing perturbation theory.
    $endgroup$
    – knzhou
    22 mins ago












  • $begingroup$
    As such this question ends up sounding like... "what is calculus and why is it introduced in quantum field theory class?", or "what is the quadratic formula and why is it useful for statistical mechanics?"
    $endgroup$
    – knzhou
    21 mins ago














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I don't seem to understand what perturbation theory really is, and what it is needed for. Can someone please provide an explanation for what it is, and why it is needed in QM?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I don't seem to understand what perturbation theory really is, and what it is needed for. Can someone please provide an explanation for what it is, and why it is needed in QM?







quantum-mechanics perturbation-theory






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 24 mins ago









knzhou

44.3k11121214




44.3k11121214






New contributor




Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









Claus KlausenClaus Klausen

164




164




New contributor




Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Claus Klausen is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
    $endgroup$
    – flaudemus
    5 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This seems to be a side effect of an incomplete physics education. Perturbation theory is an incredibly broad set of techniques useful in all subfields of physics and much of applied mathematics at large. But often people are not introduced to it until a quantum mechanics course, probably because there's not enough time to look at nontrivial (i.e. no simple closed form solution) problems earlier in the curriculum, which would motivate introducing perturbation theory.
    $endgroup$
    – knzhou
    22 mins ago












  • $begingroup$
    As such this question ends up sounding like... "what is calculus and why is it introduced in quantum field theory class?", or "what is the quadratic formula and why is it useful for statistical mechanics?"
    $endgroup$
    – knzhou
    21 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
    $endgroup$
    – flaudemus
    5 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This seems to be a side effect of an incomplete physics education. Perturbation theory is an incredibly broad set of techniques useful in all subfields of physics and much of applied mathematics at large. But often people are not introduced to it until a quantum mechanics course, probably because there's not enough time to look at nontrivial (i.e. no simple closed form solution) problems earlier in the curriculum, which would motivate introducing perturbation theory.
    $endgroup$
    – knzhou
    22 mins ago












  • $begingroup$
    As such this question ends up sounding like... "what is calculus and why is it introduced in quantum field theory class?", or "what is the quadratic formula and why is it useful for statistical mechanics?"
    $endgroup$
    – knzhou
    21 mins ago
















$begingroup$
Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
$endgroup$
– flaudemus
5 hours ago






$begingroup$
Perturbation theory allows you to calculate the response of a system to a small perturbation. For example, it can tell you, how energy levels shift under the influence of the perturbation, how energy level degeneracies are lifted, and it even allows you to calculate linear response functions. You should be able to find more detailed answers to your question in standard QM books and on the web.
$endgroup$
– flaudemus
5 hours ago






1




1




$begingroup$
This seems to be a side effect of an incomplete physics education. Perturbation theory is an incredibly broad set of techniques useful in all subfields of physics and much of applied mathematics at large. But often people are not introduced to it until a quantum mechanics course, probably because there's not enough time to look at nontrivial (i.e. no simple closed form solution) problems earlier in the curriculum, which would motivate introducing perturbation theory.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
22 mins ago






$begingroup$
This seems to be a side effect of an incomplete physics education. Perturbation theory is an incredibly broad set of techniques useful in all subfields of physics and much of applied mathematics at large. But often people are not introduced to it until a quantum mechanics course, probably because there's not enough time to look at nontrivial (i.e. no simple closed form solution) problems earlier in the curriculum, which would motivate introducing perturbation theory.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
22 mins ago














$begingroup$
As such this question ends up sounding like... "what is calculus and why is it introduced in quantum field theory class?", or "what is the quadratic formula and why is it useful for statistical mechanics?"
$endgroup$
– knzhou
21 mins ago




$begingroup$
As such this question ends up sounding like... "what is calculus and why is it introduced in quantum field theory class?", or "what is the quadratic formula and why is it useful for statistical mechanics?"
$endgroup$
– knzhou
21 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

There are two main reasons.



The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.



The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Claus Klausen
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    3 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462242%2fwhy-is-perturbation-theory-used-in-quantum-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

There are two main reasons.



The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.



The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Claus Klausen
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    3 hours ago
















8












$begingroup$

There are two main reasons.



The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.



The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Claus Klausen
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    3 hours ago














8












8








8





$begingroup$

There are two main reasons.



The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.



The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



There are two main reasons.



The first is practical, and it is that QM is hard. Very few systems are solvable, particularly in the presence of interactions. There's a wide variety of situations where perturbation theory is the only available way to make any headway at all.



The second one is conceptual and it is basically that it allows us to establish a hierarchy in the strengths of the different components of a system, and it allows us to have a clearer picture of how this strengths scale with the parameters of the system. Thus, even if you can solve the full system, if one component is weak, it often makes sense to treat it explicitly as a perturbation, so that you can keep a clearer track of how the different aspects of the solution (energies, eigenfunctions, dipole moments, what have you) scale.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 5 hours ago









Emilio PisantyEmilio Pisanty

83.5k22205420




83.5k22205420












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Claus Klausen
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Claus Klausen
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Pisanty
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
    $endgroup$
    – Dvij Mankad
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Claus Klausen
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– Claus Klausen
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Does your answer work well for all controlled approximations, perturbative or otherwise? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@DvijMankad I have no idea what scope you're thinking of. Ask separately.
$endgroup$
– Emilio Pisanty
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
I was thinking schemes where we have a small parameter but we are not doing perturbation theory, for example, the adiabatic approximation. I will try to formulate a separate question.
$endgroup$
– Dvij Mankad
3 hours ago










Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Claus Klausen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462242%2fwhy-is-perturbation-theory-used-in-quantum-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Szabolcs (Ungheria) Altri progetti | Menu di navigazione48°10′14.56″N 21°29′33.14″E /...

Discografia di Klaus Schulze Indice Album in studio | Album dal vivo | Singoli | Antologie | Colonne...

How to make inet_server_addr() return localhost in spite of ::1/128RETURN NEXT in Postgres FunctionConnect to...