Ygthkb

Why did Ylvis use "go" instead of "say" in phrases like "Dog goes 'woof'"?

I am a giant among ants

Is it possible to detect 100% of SQLi with a simple regex?

Dealing with an internal ScriptKiddie

Why is Shelob considered evil?

What can I do to encourage my players to use their consumables?

How bad is a Computer Science course that doesn't teach Design Patterns?

I have trouble understanding this fallacy: "If A, then B. Therefore if not-B, then not-A."

Visit to Paris in layover time, which visa?

Using Ansible, how can I take actions on each file in a specific location?

How can I put a period right after the algorithm's number in the algorithm's title?

What's the reason that we have different quantities of days each month?

How can I differentiate duration vs starting time

How do I fight with Heavy Armor as a Wizard with Tenser's Transformation?

Why "rm -r" is unable to delete this folder?

How can I prevent an oracle who can see into the past from knowing everything that has happened?

What could cause an entire planet of humans to become aphasic?

How can changes in personality/values of a person who turned into a vampire be explained?

Taking out the plank from one's own eye

Is it really OK to use "because of"?

Why write a book when there's a movie in my head?

Explicit way to check whether a function was called from within the Window

Intersection of 3 planes in 3D space

Isn't a semicolon (';') needed after a function declaration in C++?

How to draw a node with two options using TikZ graphs in LaTeX

Rotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationIntersection of paths with constructed namesHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?Numerical conditional within tikz keys?Why do I get an extra white page before my TikZ picture?Drawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themHow to draw a square and its diagonals with arrows?Compound Pathway Problem with holesTikZ: flipping shape without moving anchors

2

1

I'm trying to draw a node optionA with two options option1 and option3 which should appear in 45 degrees from the center. Actually, I tried to change this:

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> option1 -> option2 };

to

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

But option1 and option2 should equally distanced (45/-45 degrees) from optionA.

Thanks for any suggestion.

Edit:

Here is this within a document:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{tikz}

 usetikzlibrary{graphs}



begin{document}

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{document}

tikz-pgf

share|improve this question

edited 44 mins ago

user4712458

asked 1 hour ago

user4712458user4712458

875

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @marmot, Binary trees appears in a vertical manner. I wanted just 2 options that will appear horizontally.
  
  – user4712458
  47 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

1

I'm trying to draw a node optionA with two options option1 and option3 which should appear in 45 degrees from the center. Actually, I tried to change this:

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> option1 -> option2 };

to

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

But option1 and option2 should equally distanced (45/-45 degrees) from optionA.

Thanks for any suggestion.

Edit:

Here is this within a document:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{tikz}

 usetikzlibrary{graphs}



begin{document}

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{document}

tikz-pgf

share|improve this question

edited 44 mins ago

user4712458

asked 1 hour ago

user4712458user4712458

875

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @marmot, Binary trees appears in a vertical manner. I wanted just 2 options that will appear horizontally.
  
  – user4712458
  47 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I'm trying to draw a node optionA with two options option1 and option3 which should appear in 45 degrees from the center. Actually, I tried to change this:

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> option1 -> option2 };

to

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

But option1 and option2 should equally distanced (45/-45 degrees) from optionA.

Thanks for any suggestion.

Edit:

Here is this within a document:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{tikz}

 usetikzlibrary{graphs}



begin{document}

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{document}

tikz-pgf

share|improve this question

edited 44 mins ago

user4712458

asked 1 hour ago

user4712458user4712458

875

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> option1 -> option2 };

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

documentclass{article}

usepackage{tikz}

 usetikzlibrary{graphs}



begin{document}

tikz graph [grow right=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{document}

share|improve this question

edited 44 mins ago

user4712458

asked 1 hour ago

user4712458user4712458

875

share|improve this question

edited 44 mins ago

user4712458

asked 1 hour ago

user4712458user4712458

875

asked 1 hour ago

user4712458user4712458

875

asked 1 hour ago

user4712458user4712458

875

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

3

binary tree layout gives you such graphs. The following example requires lualatex.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usetikzlibrary{graphs, graphdrawing}

usegdlibrary{trees}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm,

grow=right] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}



begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}

For trees you may want to consider using forest, which, unlike the above, does not require lualatex, and is really powerful.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage[edges]{forest}

begin{document}

begin{forest}

for tree={grow'=east,edge = {-latex},

s sep=2cm,l sep=2cm

}

[optionA 

 [option1]

 [option2]

]

end{forest}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

edited 24 mins ago

answered 44 mins ago

marmotmarmot

103k4122233

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The first option is exactly how I want to appear them. The graphdrawing requires to run LuaLaTex, is it any way that I can avoid to use it :/
  
  – user4712458
  31 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @user4712458 Honestly, if you want to draw such trees you will IMHO be much better off with forest, which does not require lualatex. AFAIK the graph drawing libraries, on the other hand, do require lualatex.
  
  – marmot
  29 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @user4712458 I added a forest alternative.
  
  – marmot
  24 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, using the forest now it's perfect! Thank you!!
  
  – user4712458
  21 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476447%2fhow-to-draw-a-node-with-two-options-using-tikz-graphs-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

binary tree layout gives you such graphs. The following example requires lualatex.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usetikzlibrary{graphs, graphdrawing}

usegdlibrary{trees}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm,

grow=right] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}



begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}

For trees you may want to consider using forest, which, unlike the above, does not require lualatex, and is really powerful.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage[edges]{forest}

begin{document}

begin{forest}

for tree={grow'=east,edge = {-latex},

s sep=2cm,l sep=2cm

}

[optionA 

 [option1]

 [option2]

]

end{forest}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

edited 24 mins ago

answered 44 mins ago

marmotmarmot

103k4122233

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The first option is exactly how I want to appear them. The graphdrawing requires to run LuaLaTex, is it any way that I can avoid to use it :/
  
  – user4712458
  31 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @user4712458 Honestly, if you want to draw such trees you will IMHO be much better off with forest, which does not require lualatex. AFAIK the graph drawing libraries, on the other hand, do require lualatex.
  
  – marmot
  29 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @user4712458 I added a forest alternative.
  
  – marmot
  24 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, using the forest now it's perfect! Thank you!!
  
  – user4712458
  21 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

binary tree layout gives you such graphs. The following example requires lualatex.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usetikzlibrary{graphs, graphdrawing}

usegdlibrary{trees}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm,

grow=right] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}



begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}

For trees you may want to consider using forest, which, unlike the above, does not require lualatex, and is really powerful.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage[edges]{forest}

begin{document}

begin{forest}

for tree={grow'=east,edge = {-latex},

s sep=2cm,l sep=2cm

}

[optionA 

 [option1]

 [option2]

]

end{forest}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

edited 24 mins ago

answered 44 mins ago

marmotmarmot

103k4122233

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The first option is exactly how I want to appear them. The graphdrawing requires to run LuaLaTex, is it any way that I can avoid to use it :/
  
  – user4712458
  31 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @user4712458 Honestly, if you want to draw such trees you will IMHO be much better off with forest, which does not require lualatex. AFAIK the graph drawing libraries, on the other hand, do require lualatex.
  
  – marmot
  29 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @user4712458 I added a forest alternative.
  
  – marmot
  24 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Yes, using the forest now it's perfect! Thank you!!
  
  – user4712458
  21 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

binary tree layout gives you such graphs. The following example requires lualatex.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usetikzlibrary{graphs, graphdrawing}

usegdlibrary{trees}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm,

grow=right] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}



begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}

For trees you may want to consider using forest, which, unlike the above, does not require lualatex, and is really powerful.

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage[edges]{forest}

begin{document}

begin{forest}

for tree={grow'=east,edge = {-latex},

s sep=2cm,l sep=2cm

}

[optionA 

 [option1]

 [option2]

]

end{forest}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

edited 24 mins ago

answered 44 mins ago

marmotmarmot

103k4122233

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usetikzlibrary{graphs, graphdrawing}

usegdlibrary{trees}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm,

grow=right] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}



begin{tikzpicture}

graph [binary tree layout, level distance=2cm, sibling distance=2cm] { optionA -> {option1, option2} };

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}

documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage[edges]{forest}

begin{document}

begin{forest}

for tree={grow'=east,edge = {-latex},

s sep=2cm,l sep=2cm

}

[optionA 

 [option1]

 [option2]

]

end{forest}

end{document}

share|improve this answer

edited 24 mins ago

answered 44 mins ago

marmotmarmot

103k4122233

answered 44 mins ago

marmotmarmot

103k4122233

answered 44 mins ago

marmotmarmot

103k4122233