Levi-Civita symbol: 3D matrixHow to prepare coordinates for 3D surface plot using pgfplotsdrawing a matrix...

Difference between 'stomach' and 'uterus'

Center single line(s) in align

How do ISS astronauts "get their stripes"?

Find how "smooth" a number is based on binary

How to kill a localhost:8080

Where is the line between being obedient and getting bullied by a boss

Sometimes a banana is just a banana

How to make a mimic a challenging fight for high level party?

How would we write a misogynistic character without offending people?

Does being OVERLY tall affect taekwondo?

Is the set of paths between any two points moving only in units on the plane countable or uncountable?

Is the helper verb 'werden' mandatory in both passive clauses separated by an 'oder', or only at the very the end?

How can atoms be electrically neutral when there is a difference in the positions of the charges?

Is it possible to keep the Ring of Winter if you manage to acquire it?

Can I send almost 1MB transaction?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Test pad's ESD protection

Pure Functions: Does "No Side Effects" Imply "Always Same Output, Given Same Input"?

Heating basement floor with water heater

What type of postprocessing gives the effect of people standing out

Make me a metasequence

How can I be pwned if I'm not registered on the compromised site?

Are small insurances worth it

Get length of the longest sequence of numbers with the same sign



Levi-Civita symbol: 3D matrix


How to prepare coordinates for 3D surface plot using pgfplotsdrawing a matrix with its minorsHorizontal line in MatrixUnexpected padding in tikz matrix with one rowTypesetting a band diagonal matrixSketching a rectangle around elements of a matrixHow to draw complex matrix?Big matrix in two partsHow can I draw this Matrix?Determinant of 3x3 matrix by cofactor expansion













4















During the current review of the tensors I have arrived at a page of Wikipedia where you can see the symbol of Levi-Civita in a beautiful three-dimensional matrix.



enter image description here



I hope that nobody will be angry with me if I do not produce any MWE but for me it would be nice to see the construction of a matrix so made and can be made available to other users.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Nobody will be angry, don't worry. If I hadn't reached my 40-vote limit, you would have got my +1. Your question is very interesting (and hard).

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago













  • @JouleV LOL LOL when I thought about what to write, I sincerely thought about you :-). Isn't it that you write to me that I'm 10k and I don't produce even a minimum MWE?

    – Sebastiano
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Well, I was thinking about how to solve this and I read that word ;-) lol I knew I had to write something :D

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago
















4















During the current review of the tensors I have arrived at a page of Wikipedia where you can see the symbol of Levi-Civita in a beautiful three-dimensional matrix.



enter image description here



I hope that nobody will be angry with me if I do not produce any MWE but for me it would be nice to see the construction of a matrix so made and can be made available to other users.










share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Nobody will be angry, don't worry. If I hadn't reached my 40-vote limit, you would have got my +1. Your question is very interesting (and hard).

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago













  • @JouleV LOL LOL when I thought about what to write, I sincerely thought about you :-). Isn't it that you write to me that I'm 10k and I don't produce even a minimum MWE?

    – Sebastiano
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Well, I was thinking about how to solve this and I read that word ;-) lol I knew I had to write something :D

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago














4












4








4








During the current review of the tensors I have arrived at a page of Wikipedia where you can see the symbol of Levi-Civita in a beautiful three-dimensional matrix.



enter image description here



I hope that nobody will be angry with me if I do not produce any MWE but for me it would be nice to see the construction of a matrix so made and can be made available to other users.










share|improve this question














During the current review of the tensors I have arrived at a page of Wikipedia where you can see the symbol of Levi-Civita in a beautiful three-dimensional matrix.



enter image description here



I hope that nobody will be angry with me if I do not produce any MWE but for me it would be nice to see the construction of a matrix so made and can be made available to other users.







matrices 3d tikz-matrix






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









SebastianoSebastiano

10.5k42060




10.5k42060








  • 1





    Nobody will be angry, don't worry. If I hadn't reached my 40-vote limit, you would have got my +1. Your question is very interesting (and hard).

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago













  • @JouleV LOL LOL when I thought about what to write, I sincerely thought about you :-). Isn't it that you write to me that I'm 10k and I don't produce even a minimum MWE?

    – Sebastiano
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Well, I was thinking about how to solve this and I read that word ;-) lol I knew I had to write something :D

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    Nobody will be angry, don't worry. If I hadn't reached my 40-vote limit, you would have got my +1. Your question is very interesting (and hard).

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago













  • @JouleV LOL LOL when I thought about what to write, I sincerely thought about you :-). Isn't it that you write to me that I'm 10k and I don't produce even a minimum MWE?

    – Sebastiano
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Well, I was thinking about how to solve this and I read that word ;-) lol I knew I had to write something :D

    – JouleV
    1 hour ago








1




1





Nobody will be angry, don't worry. If I hadn't reached my 40-vote limit, you would have got my +1. Your question is very interesting (and hard).

– JouleV
1 hour ago







Nobody will be angry, don't worry. If I hadn't reached my 40-vote limit, you would have got my +1. Your question is very interesting (and hard).

– JouleV
1 hour ago















@JouleV LOL LOL when I thought about what to write, I sincerely thought about you :-). Isn't it that you write to me that I'm 10k and I don't produce even a minimum MWE?

– Sebastiano
1 hour ago





@JouleV LOL LOL when I thought about what to write, I sincerely thought about you :-). Isn't it that you write to me that I'm 10k and I don't produce even a minimum MWE?

– Sebastiano
1 hour ago




1




1





Well, I was thinking about how to solve this and I read that word ;-) lol I knew I had to write something :D

– JouleV
1 hour ago





Well, I was thinking about how to solve this and I read that word ;-) lol I knew I had to write something :D

– JouleV
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














Something like that?



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{mathtools}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,backgrounds,3d}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
%definecolor{mygreen}{RGB}{12,252,12}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{75}{20}
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=green!70!black,opacity=0.8] (mat1)
{$displaystylebegin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 1 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[green!70!black,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.south west)
coordinate (blb) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.north west) coordinate (tlb) --
([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.north east) coordinate (trb)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.south east)
coordinate (brb)
-- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=0,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=red,opacity=0.8] (mat2) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & -1 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[red,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.south west) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.north west) -- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.north east)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.south east) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=-1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=blue,opacity=0.8] (mat3) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & -1 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[blue,opacity=0.2]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.south west) coordinate (blf)
to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.north west) coordinate (tlf)
-- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.north east) coordinate (trf)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.south east)
coordinate (brf) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
foreach X in {tl,tr,br}
{draw[thin,orange] (X f) -- (X b);}
begin{scope}[on background layer]
draw[thin,orange] (blf) -- (blb);
end{scope}
node[left] at (mat3.west) {$varepsilon_{ijk}=$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here



EDIT: Aligned the entries right, big thanks to Barbara Beeton. (I just wonder why no one complained that the Levi-Civita tensor is not a tensor, but a tensor density. ;-)






share|improve this answer


























  • Two main differences with the image in the question: (1) in the negative entries, the digits are not aligned (and the spacing between columns adjusted to make them visually uniform), and (2) the tops and bottoms of the parentheses are not connected. of these, (1) detracts more from the appearance, although the meaning isn't affected; I happen to velue graceful appearance.

    – barbara beeton
    45 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Thanks! (1) can be addressed in a very simple way: loading mathtools and using begin{pmatrix*}[r]. (2) I do not understand. In Sebastiano's screen shot there are these four lines. Of course, if you'd ask me what they are good for, I'd admit that this is a very good question. ;-) Will revise my answer to address (1), thanks again!

    – marmot
    40 mins ago



















4














More or less:



documentclass[tikz,border=2mm]{standalone} 
usetikzlibrary{positioning, matrix}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lmodern}

begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily,
mymatrix/.style={
matrix of math nodes, inner sep=0pt, color=#1,
column sep=0pt, row sep=0pt, anchor=south west,
nodes={anchor=center, minimum width=7mm,
minimum height=5mm, outer sep=0pt, text width=5mm, align=right}}
]

matrix (C) [mymatrix=green] at (5mm,5mm)
{0 & 1 & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0\};
fill[green!30, opacity=.5] (C.north west)--(C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east)--(C.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (C.north west);
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (C.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (B) [mymatrix=red] at (2.5mm,2.5mm)
{0 & 0 & -1 \ 0 & 0 & 0\ 1 & 0 & 0\};
fill[red!30, opacity=.5] (B.north west)--(B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east)--(B.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (B.north west);
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (B.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (A) [mymatrix=blue] at (0,0)
{0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1\ 0 & -1 & 0\};
fill[blue!30, opacity=.5] (A.north west)--(A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east)--(A.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (A.north west);
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (A.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north west)--(C.north west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north east)--(C.north east);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south west)--(C.south west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south east)--(C.south east);

node[left=5mm of B.west] {$epsilon_{ijk} =$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Please see point (1) in my comment to the answer by @marmot.

    – barbara beeton
    44 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Is it better now?

    – Ignasi
    31 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477890%2flevi-civita-symbol-3d-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














Something like that?



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{mathtools}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,backgrounds,3d}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
%definecolor{mygreen}{RGB}{12,252,12}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{75}{20}
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=green!70!black,opacity=0.8] (mat1)
{$displaystylebegin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 1 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[green!70!black,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.south west)
coordinate (blb) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.north west) coordinate (tlb) --
([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.north east) coordinate (trb)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.south east)
coordinate (brb)
-- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=0,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=red,opacity=0.8] (mat2) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & -1 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[red,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.south west) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.north west) -- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.north east)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.south east) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=-1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=blue,opacity=0.8] (mat3) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & -1 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[blue,opacity=0.2]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.south west) coordinate (blf)
to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.north west) coordinate (tlf)
-- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.north east) coordinate (trf)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.south east)
coordinate (brf) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
foreach X in {tl,tr,br}
{draw[thin,orange] (X f) -- (X b);}
begin{scope}[on background layer]
draw[thin,orange] (blf) -- (blb);
end{scope}
node[left] at (mat3.west) {$varepsilon_{ijk}=$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here



EDIT: Aligned the entries right, big thanks to Barbara Beeton. (I just wonder why no one complained that the Levi-Civita tensor is not a tensor, but a tensor density. ;-)






share|improve this answer


























  • Two main differences with the image in the question: (1) in the negative entries, the digits are not aligned (and the spacing between columns adjusted to make them visually uniform), and (2) the tops and bottoms of the parentheses are not connected. of these, (1) detracts more from the appearance, although the meaning isn't affected; I happen to velue graceful appearance.

    – barbara beeton
    45 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Thanks! (1) can be addressed in a very simple way: loading mathtools and using begin{pmatrix*}[r]. (2) I do not understand. In Sebastiano's screen shot there are these four lines. Of course, if you'd ask me what they are good for, I'd admit that this is a very good question. ;-) Will revise my answer to address (1), thanks again!

    – marmot
    40 mins ago
















4














Something like that?



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{mathtools}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,backgrounds,3d}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
%definecolor{mygreen}{RGB}{12,252,12}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{75}{20}
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=green!70!black,opacity=0.8] (mat1)
{$displaystylebegin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 1 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[green!70!black,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.south west)
coordinate (blb) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.north west) coordinate (tlb) --
([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.north east) coordinate (trb)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.south east)
coordinate (brb)
-- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=0,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=red,opacity=0.8] (mat2) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & -1 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[red,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.south west) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.north west) -- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.north east)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.south east) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=-1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=blue,opacity=0.8] (mat3) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & -1 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[blue,opacity=0.2]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.south west) coordinate (blf)
to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.north west) coordinate (tlf)
-- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.north east) coordinate (trf)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.south east)
coordinate (brf) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
foreach X in {tl,tr,br}
{draw[thin,orange] (X f) -- (X b);}
begin{scope}[on background layer]
draw[thin,orange] (blf) -- (blb);
end{scope}
node[left] at (mat3.west) {$varepsilon_{ijk}=$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here



EDIT: Aligned the entries right, big thanks to Barbara Beeton. (I just wonder why no one complained that the Levi-Civita tensor is not a tensor, but a tensor density. ;-)






share|improve this answer


























  • Two main differences with the image in the question: (1) in the negative entries, the digits are not aligned (and the spacing between columns adjusted to make them visually uniform), and (2) the tops and bottoms of the parentheses are not connected. of these, (1) detracts more from the appearance, although the meaning isn't affected; I happen to velue graceful appearance.

    – barbara beeton
    45 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Thanks! (1) can be addressed in a very simple way: loading mathtools and using begin{pmatrix*}[r]. (2) I do not understand. In Sebastiano's screen shot there are these four lines. Of course, if you'd ask me what they are good for, I'd admit that this is a very good question. ;-) Will revise my answer to address (1), thanks again!

    – marmot
    40 mins ago














4












4








4







Something like that?



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{mathtools}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,backgrounds,3d}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
%definecolor{mygreen}{RGB}{12,252,12}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{75}{20}
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=green!70!black,opacity=0.8] (mat1)
{$displaystylebegin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 1 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[green!70!black,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.south west)
coordinate (blb) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.north west) coordinate (tlb) --
([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.north east) coordinate (trb)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.south east)
coordinate (brb)
-- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=0,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=red,opacity=0.8] (mat2) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & -1 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[red,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.south west) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.north west) -- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.north east)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.south east) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=-1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=blue,opacity=0.8] (mat3) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & -1 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[blue,opacity=0.2]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.south west) coordinate (blf)
to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.north west) coordinate (tlf)
-- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.north east) coordinate (trf)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.south east)
coordinate (brf) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
foreach X in {tl,tr,br}
{draw[thin,orange] (X f) -- (X b);}
begin{scope}[on background layer]
draw[thin,orange] (blf) -- (blb);
end{scope}
node[left] at (mat3.west) {$varepsilon_{ijk}=$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here



EDIT: Aligned the entries right, big thanks to Barbara Beeton. (I just wonder why no one complained that the Levi-Civita tensor is not a tensor, but a tensor density. ;-)






share|improve this answer















Something like that?



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{mathtools}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,backgrounds,3d}
usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
%definecolor{mygreen}{RGB}{12,252,12}
begin{document}
tdplotsetmaincoords{75}{20}
begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=green!70!black,opacity=0.8] (mat1)
{$displaystylebegin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 1 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[green!70!black,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.south west)
coordinate (blb) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat1.north west) coordinate (tlb) --
([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.north east) coordinate (trb)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat1.south east)
coordinate (brb)
-- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=0,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=red,opacity=0.8] (mat2) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & -1 \
0 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[red,opacity=0.2] ([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.south west) to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat2.north west) -- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.north east)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat2.south east) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
%
begin{scope}[canvas is xz plane at y=-1,transform shape]
node[inner sep=0pt,text=blue,opacity=0.8] (mat3) {$displaystyle
begin{pmatrix*}[r]
0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & -1 & 0 \
end{pmatrix*}$};
begin{scope}[on background layer]
fill[blue,opacity=0.2]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.south west) coordinate (blf)
to[out=140,in=-140,looseness=0.7]
([xshift=8.5pt]mat3.north west) coordinate (tlf)
-- ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.north east) coordinate (trf)
to[out=-40,in=40,looseness=0.7] ([xshift=-8.5pt]mat3.south east)
coordinate (brf) -- cycle;
end{scope}
end{scope}
foreach X in {tl,tr,br}
{draw[thin,orange] (X f) -- (X b);}
begin{scope}[on background layer]
draw[thin,orange] (blf) -- (blb);
end{scope}
node[left] at (mat3.west) {$varepsilon_{ijk}=$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here



EDIT: Aligned the entries right, big thanks to Barbara Beeton. (I just wonder why no one complained that the Levi-Civita tensor is not a tensor, but a tensor density. ;-)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 37 mins ago

























answered 55 mins ago









marmotmarmot

106k4127241




106k4127241













  • Two main differences with the image in the question: (1) in the negative entries, the digits are not aligned (and the spacing between columns adjusted to make them visually uniform), and (2) the tops and bottoms of the parentheses are not connected. of these, (1) detracts more from the appearance, although the meaning isn't affected; I happen to velue graceful appearance.

    – barbara beeton
    45 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Thanks! (1) can be addressed in a very simple way: loading mathtools and using begin{pmatrix*}[r]. (2) I do not understand. In Sebastiano's screen shot there are these four lines. Of course, if you'd ask me what they are good for, I'd admit that this is a very good question. ;-) Will revise my answer to address (1), thanks again!

    – marmot
    40 mins ago



















  • Two main differences with the image in the question: (1) in the negative entries, the digits are not aligned (and the spacing between columns adjusted to make them visually uniform), and (2) the tops and bottoms of the parentheses are not connected. of these, (1) detracts more from the appearance, although the meaning isn't affected; I happen to velue graceful appearance.

    – barbara beeton
    45 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Thanks! (1) can be addressed in a very simple way: loading mathtools and using begin{pmatrix*}[r]. (2) I do not understand. In Sebastiano's screen shot there are these four lines. Of course, if you'd ask me what they are good for, I'd admit that this is a very good question. ;-) Will revise my answer to address (1), thanks again!

    – marmot
    40 mins ago

















Two main differences with the image in the question: (1) in the negative entries, the digits are not aligned (and the spacing between columns adjusted to make them visually uniform), and (2) the tops and bottoms of the parentheses are not connected. of these, (1) detracts more from the appearance, although the meaning isn't affected; I happen to velue graceful appearance.

– barbara beeton
45 mins ago





Two main differences with the image in the question: (1) in the negative entries, the digits are not aligned (and the spacing between columns adjusted to make them visually uniform), and (2) the tops and bottoms of the parentheses are not connected. of these, (1) detracts more from the appearance, although the meaning isn't affected; I happen to velue graceful appearance.

– barbara beeton
45 mins ago













@barbarabeeton Thanks! (1) can be addressed in a very simple way: loading mathtools and using begin{pmatrix*}[r]. (2) I do not understand. In Sebastiano's screen shot there are these four lines. Of course, if you'd ask me what they are good for, I'd admit that this is a very good question. ;-) Will revise my answer to address (1), thanks again!

– marmot
40 mins ago





@barbarabeeton Thanks! (1) can be addressed in a very simple way: loading mathtools and using begin{pmatrix*}[r]. (2) I do not understand. In Sebastiano's screen shot there are these four lines. Of course, if you'd ask me what they are good for, I'd admit that this is a very good question. ;-) Will revise my answer to address (1), thanks again!

– marmot
40 mins ago











4














More or less:



documentclass[tikz,border=2mm]{standalone} 
usetikzlibrary{positioning, matrix}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lmodern}

begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily,
mymatrix/.style={
matrix of math nodes, inner sep=0pt, color=#1,
column sep=0pt, row sep=0pt, anchor=south west,
nodes={anchor=center, minimum width=7mm,
minimum height=5mm, outer sep=0pt, text width=5mm, align=right}}
]

matrix (C) [mymatrix=green] at (5mm,5mm)
{0 & 1 & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0\};
fill[green!30, opacity=.5] (C.north west)--(C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east)--(C.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (C.north west);
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (C.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (B) [mymatrix=red] at (2.5mm,2.5mm)
{0 & 0 & -1 \ 0 & 0 & 0\ 1 & 0 & 0\};
fill[red!30, opacity=.5] (B.north west)--(B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east)--(B.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (B.north west);
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (B.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (A) [mymatrix=blue] at (0,0)
{0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1\ 0 & -1 & 0\};
fill[blue!30, opacity=.5] (A.north west)--(A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east)--(A.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (A.north west);
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (A.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north west)--(C.north west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north east)--(C.north east);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south west)--(C.south west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south east)--(C.south east);

node[left=5mm of B.west] {$epsilon_{ijk} =$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Please see point (1) in my comment to the answer by @marmot.

    – barbara beeton
    44 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Is it better now?

    – Ignasi
    31 mins ago
















4














More or less:



documentclass[tikz,border=2mm]{standalone} 
usetikzlibrary{positioning, matrix}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lmodern}

begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily,
mymatrix/.style={
matrix of math nodes, inner sep=0pt, color=#1,
column sep=0pt, row sep=0pt, anchor=south west,
nodes={anchor=center, minimum width=7mm,
minimum height=5mm, outer sep=0pt, text width=5mm, align=right}}
]

matrix (C) [mymatrix=green] at (5mm,5mm)
{0 & 1 & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0\};
fill[green!30, opacity=.5] (C.north west)--(C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east)--(C.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (C.north west);
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (C.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (B) [mymatrix=red] at (2.5mm,2.5mm)
{0 & 0 & -1 \ 0 & 0 & 0\ 1 & 0 & 0\};
fill[red!30, opacity=.5] (B.north west)--(B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east)--(B.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (B.north west);
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (B.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (A) [mymatrix=blue] at (0,0)
{0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1\ 0 & -1 & 0\};
fill[blue!30, opacity=.5] (A.north west)--(A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east)--(A.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (A.north west);
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (A.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north west)--(C.north west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north east)--(C.north east);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south west)--(C.south west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south east)--(C.south east);

node[left=5mm of B.west] {$epsilon_{ijk} =$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Please see point (1) in my comment to the answer by @marmot.

    – barbara beeton
    44 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Is it better now?

    – Ignasi
    31 mins ago














4












4








4







More or less:



documentclass[tikz,border=2mm]{standalone} 
usetikzlibrary{positioning, matrix}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lmodern}

begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily,
mymatrix/.style={
matrix of math nodes, inner sep=0pt, color=#1,
column sep=0pt, row sep=0pt, anchor=south west,
nodes={anchor=center, minimum width=7mm,
minimum height=5mm, outer sep=0pt, text width=5mm, align=right}}
]

matrix (C) [mymatrix=green] at (5mm,5mm)
{0 & 1 & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0\};
fill[green!30, opacity=.5] (C.north west)--(C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east)--(C.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (C.north west);
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (C.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (B) [mymatrix=red] at (2.5mm,2.5mm)
{0 & 0 & -1 \ 0 & 0 & 0\ 1 & 0 & 0\};
fill[red!30, opacity=.5] (B.north west)--(B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east)--(B.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (B.north west);
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (B.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (A) [mymatrix=blue] at (0,0)
{0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1\ 0 & -1 & 0\};
fill[blue!30, opacity=.5] (A.north west)--(A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east)--(A.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (A.north west);
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (A.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north west)--(C.north west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north east)--(C.north east);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south west)--(C.south west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south east)--(C.south east);

node[left=5mm of B.west] {$epsilon_{ijk} =$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















More or less:



documentclass[tikz,border=2mm]{standalone} 
usetikzlibrary{positioning, matrix}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{lmodern}

begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[font=sffamily,
mymatrix/.style={
matrix of math nodes, inner sep=0pt, color=#1,
column sep=0pt, row sep=0pt, anchor=south west,
nodes={anchor=center, minimum width=7mm,
minimum height=5mm, outer sep=0pt, text width=5mm, align=right}}
]

matrix (C) [mymatrix=green] at (5mm,5mm)
{0 & 1 & 0 \ 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0\};
fill[green!30, opacity=.5] (C.north west)--(C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east)--(C.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (C.north west);
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (C.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[green!30!black, opacity=.5] (C.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (C.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (B) [mymatrix=red] at (2.5mm,2.5mm)
{0 & 0 & -1 \ 0 & 0 & 0\ 1 & 0 & 0\};
fill[red!30, opacity=.5] (B.north west)--(B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east)--(B.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (B.north west);
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (B.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[red!30!black, opacity=.5] (B.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (B.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

matrix (A) [mymatrix=blue] at (0,0)
{0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 1\ 0 & -1 & 0\};
fill[blue!30, opacity=.5] (A.north west)--(A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east)--(A.south west) to[out=105, in=-105] (A.north west);
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north east) to[out=-75, in=75] (A.south east) to[out=78, in=-78] cycle;
fill[blue!30!black, opacity=.5] (A.north west) to[out=-105, in=105] (A.south west) to[out=102, in=-102] cycle;

draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north west)--(C.north west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.north east)--(C.north east);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south west)--(C.south west);
draw[brown, ultra thin] (A.south east)--(C.south east);

node[left=5mm of B.west] {$epsilon_{ijk} =$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 31 mins ago

























answered 55 mins ago









IgnasiIgnasi

93.9k4170312




93.9k4170312













  • Please see point (1) in my comment to the answer by @marmot.

    – barbara beeton
    44 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Is it better now?

    – Ignasi
    31 mins ago



















  • Please see point (1) in my comment to the answer by @marmot.

    – barbara beeton
    44 mins ago











  • @barbarabeeton Is it better now?

    – Ignasi
    31 mins ago

















Please see point (1) in my comment to the answer by @marmot.

– barbara beeton
44 mins ago





Please see point (1) in my comment to the answer by @marmot.

– barbara beeton
44 mins ago













@barbarabeeton Is it better now?

– Ignasi
31 mins ago





@barbarabeeton Is it better now?

– Ignasi
31 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477890%2flevi-civita-symbol-3d-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Discografia di Klaus Schulze Indice Album in studio | Album dal vivo | Singoli | Antologie | Colonne...

Lupi Siderali Indice Storia | Organizzazione | La Tredicesima Compagnia | Aspetto | Membri Importanti...

Armoriale delle famiglie italiane (Car) Indice Armi | Bibliografia | Menu di navigazioneBlasone...