What am I doing wrong in this use of split?Left aligning equations without align characterCan't generate png...

Minimum Viable Product for RTS game?

Missing a connection and don't have money to book next flight

What is the reward?

Disk space full during insert, what happens?

What sort of grammatical construct is ‘Quod per sortem sternit fortem’?

What is an efficient way to digitize a family photo collection?

Do the speed limit reductions due to pollution also apply to electric cars in France?

What am I doing wrong in this use of split?

Graphical modeler calculator missing in QGIS3

How many organs can be harvest without killing prisoners?

How to know you are over-explaining and oversimplifying a subject?

Why does this quiz question say that protons and electrons do not combine to form neutrons?

Partial derivative with respect to three variables

Are one-line email responses considered disrespectful?

Canadian Visa by land

Short story about a man betting a group he could tell a story, and one of them would disappear and the others would not notice

Converting numbers to words - Python

How can I give a Ranger advantage on a check due to Favored Enemy without spoiling the story for the player?

Why write a book when there's a movie in my head?

How do I purchase a drop bar bike that will be converted to flat bar?

Cartoon in which kids compete by fighting as monsters or creatures with special powers in a virtual world

How can I differentiate duration vs starting time

How to transport 10,000 terrestrial trolls across ocean fast?

Coworker is trying to get me to sign his petition to run for office. How to decline politely?



What am I doing wrong in this use of split?


Left aligning equations without align characterCan't generate png with Error: Erroneous nesting of equation structuresUnable to use tag in split equationProblem to left align within a splitHow to split a long constraint in this optimization problem?How to align left and indent all but the first line in a mult-line equation?How to prettyprint a large equation with multiple split points?How can I align this equation in the center?Align equations within one lineHow to split an equation through text?













2















I'm doing something wrong in the code below that makes the last equation not be written on a line by itself. What I'm trying to do is to split the penultimate equation into two lines. But this happens:



enter image description here



The last equation continues on the right for some reason. Can you spot what is the problem?



usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{q}[2]{langle #1 | #2 rangle}
newcommand{qr}[1]{|#1rangle}
newcommand{ql}[1]{langle #1|}
DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

begin{document}
begin{align*}
qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
&= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
&= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
begin{split}
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \
&qquadqquad + U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0\
end{split}
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
end{align*}

end{document}









share|improve this question


















  • 2





    I'm not quite sure what you're aiming for, but have you tried commenting out the begin{split} and end{split}, and leaving the inner two lines alone?

    – Teepeemm
    4 hours ago











  • Wow. Why am I using split in the first place? I thought this wouldn't work at all.

    – Joep Awinita
    4 hours ago











  • Needless to say, @Teepeemm, you're answered the question completely.

    – Joep Awinita
    4 hours ago











  • But a two line comment takes far less effort than a complete answer. I'm content with letting those wanting to take the time to also take the points.

    – Teepeemm
    3 hours ago
















2















I'm doing something wrong in the code below that makes the last equation not be written on a line by itself. What I'm trying to do is to split the penultimate equation into two lines. But this happens:



enter image description here



The last equation continues on the right for some reason. Can you spot what is the problem?



usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{q}[2]{langle #1 | #2 rangle}
newcommand{qr}[1]{|#1rangle}
newcommand{ql}[1]{langle #1|}
DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

begin{document}
begin{align*}
qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
&= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
&= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
begin{split}
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \
&qquadqquad + U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0\
end{split}
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
end{align*}

end{document}









share|improve this question


















  • 2





    I'm not quite sure what you're aiming for, but have you tried commenting out the begin{split} and end{split}, and leaving the inner two lines alone?

    – Teepeemm
    4 hours ago











  • Wow. Why am I using split in the first place? I thought this wouldn't work at all.

    – Joep Awinita
    4 hours ago











  • Needless to say, @Teepeemm, you're answered the question completely.

    – Joep Awinita
    4 hours ago











  • But a two line comment takes far less effort than a complete answer. I'm content with letting those wanting to take the time to also take the points.

    – Teepeemm
    3 hours ago














2












2








2








I'm doing something wrong in the code below that makes the last equation not be written on a line by itself. What I'm trying to do is to split the penultimate equation into two lines. But this happens:



enter image description here



The last equation continues on the right for some reason. Can you spot what is the problem?



usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{q}[2]{langle #1 | #2 rangle}
newcommand{qr}[1]{|#1rangle}
newcommand{ql}[1]{langle #1|}
DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

begin{document}
begin{align*}
qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
&= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
&= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
begin{split}
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \
&qquadqquad + U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0\
end{split}
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
end{align*}

end{document}









share|improve this question














I'm doing something wrong in the code below that makes the last equation not be written on a line by itself. What I'm trying to do is to split the penultimate equation into two lines. But this happens:



enter image description here



The last equation continues on the right for some reason. Can you spot what is the problem?



usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{q}[2]{langle #1 | #2 rangle}
newcommand{qr}[1]{|#1rangle}
newcommand{ql}[1]{langle #1|}
DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

begin{document}
begin{align*}
qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
&= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
&= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
begin{split}
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \
&qquadqquad + U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0\
end{split}
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
end{align*}

end{document}






align split






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









Joep AwinitaJoep Awinita

1256




1256








  • 2





    I'm not quite sure what you're aiming for, but have you tried commenting out the begin{split} and end{split}, and leaving the inner two lines alone?

    – Teepeemm
    4 hours ago











  • Wow. Why am I using split in the first place? I thought this wouldn't work at all.

    – Joep Awinita
    4 hours ago











  • Needless to say, @Teepeemm, you're answered the question completely.

    – Joep Awinita
    4 hours ago











  • But a two line comment takes far less effort than a complete answer. I'm content with letting those wanting to take the time to also take the points.

    – Teepeemm
    3 hours ago














  • 2





    I'm not quite sure what you're aiming for, but have you tried commenting out the begin{split} and end{split}, and leaving the inner two lines alone?

    – Teepeemm
    4 hours ago











  • Wow. Why am I using split in the first place? I thought this wouldn't work at all.

    – Joep Awinita
    4 hours ago











  • Needless to say, @Teepeemm, you're answered the question completely.

    – Joep Awinita
    4 hours ago











  • But a two line comment takes far less effort than a complete answer. I'm content with letting those wanting to take the time to also take the points.

    – Teepeemm
    3 hours ago








2




2





I'm not quite sure what you're aiming for, but have you tried commenting out the begin{split} and end{split}, and leaving the inner two lines alone?

– Teepeemm
4 hours ago





I'm not quite sure what you're aiming for, but have you tried commenting out the begin{split} and end{split}, and leaving the inner two lines alone?

– Teepeemm
4 hours ago













Wow. Why am I using split in the first place? I thought this wouldn't work at all.

– Joep Awinita
4 hours ago





Wow. Why am I using split in the first place? I thought this wouldn't work at all.

– Joep Awinita
4 hours ago













Needless to say, @Teepeemm, you're answered the question completely.

– Joep Awinita
4 hours ago





Needless to say, @Teepeemm, you're answered the question completely.

– Joep Awinita
4 hours ago













But a two line comment takes far less effort than a complete answer. I'm content with letting those wanting to take the time to also take the points.

– Teepeemm
3 hours ago





But a two line comment takes far less effort than a complete answer. I'm content with letting those wanting to take the time to also take the points.

– Teepeemm
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














In addition to getting rid of the unneeded split environment, you may want to (a) typeset the U_f terms more compactly, i.e., as U_{!f}, (b) replace various left[ and right] directives with bigl[ and bigr], and (c) replace ... with dots.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'DeclarePairedDelimiter' macro
DeclarePairedDelimiterqrlvertrangle
newcommand{Uf}{U_{!f}}

begin{document}

begin{align*}
qr{psi_2}
&= Uf qr{psi_1}\
&= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3 +qr4
+qr5 +qr6 + qr7bigr] qr0 qr0\
&= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0
+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr7qr0bigr] qr0\
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
bigl[Ufqr0qr0 + Ufqr1qr0 + Ufqr2qr0+Ufqr3qr0 \
&qquadqquad
+ Ufqr4qr0+Ufqr5qr0+Ufqr6qr0
+ Ufqr7qr0bigr] qr0\
&= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + dots
+ qr{i}qr{f(i)} + dots + qr7qr1bigr] qr0,
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer































    1














    I suggest using the multlined environment from mathtools, and the DeclarePairedDelimiter command from the same package, which will produce scaling , qr and ql:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{mathtools}
    DeclarePairedDelimiterXnorm[1]lVertrVert{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
    DeclarePairedDelimiterXPP{twonorm }[1]{}{lVert}{rVert}{_{2}}{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
    DeclarePairedDelimiterXq[2]{langle}{rangle}%
    {#1,delimsizevert,mathopen{}#2}
    DeclarePairedDelimiter{qr}vertrangle
    DeclarePairedDelimiter{ql}langle rvert
    DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

    begin{document}

    begin{align*}
    qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
    &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}bigr] qr0 qr0\
    &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0bigr] qr0\
    &= begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
    qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0bigr] qr0
    end{multlined}\
    &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1bigr] qr0,
    end{align*}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


























    • The left and right directives don't succeed in making "big" square brackets -- better to use bigl[ and bigr], right? :-)

      – Mico
      3 hours ago











    • That's right. Actually, I didn't think about this problem, but I see I should have, to make the formula a little less unpleasant to read. I'll fix that. Thanks!

      – Bernard
      3 hours ago



















    0














    I think the reason you are getting this result is that the second linebreak inside the split environment should be outside, like this:



    begin{align*}
    qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
    &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
    &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
    begin{split}
    &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \
    &qquadqquad + U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
    end{split}\
    &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
    end{align*}


    Besides the recomendations given in Bernard's answer, I'd also suggest using the split environment inside equation* instead of align*, since it seems you're trying to typeset just one (albeit multi-line) equation:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    newcommand{q}[2]{langle #1 | #2 rangle}
    newcommand{qr}[1]{|#1rangle}
    newcommand{ql}[1]{langle #1|}
    DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

    begin{document}

    begin{equation*}
    begin{split}
    qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
    &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
    &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
    &=!begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
    qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
    end{multlined}\
    &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
    end{split}
    end{equation*}

    end{document}





    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Vinicius M. G. Silveira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 1





      But how to align the equal signs within equation? align is appropriate here.

      – Sigur
      3 hours ago













    • I forgot to add that I'd recomend using the split environment to align the equal signs and the multlined environment to break one the lines into two.

      – Vinicius M. G. Silveira
      3 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476218%2fwhat-am-i-doing-wrong-in-this-use-of-split%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    In addition to getting rid of the unneeded split environment, you may want to (a) typeset the U_f terms more compactly, i.e., as U_{!f}, (b) replace various left[ and right] directives with bigl[ and bigr], and (c) replace ... with dots.



    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{mathtools} % for 'DeclarePairedDelimiter' macro
    DeclarePairedDelimiterqrlvertrangle
    newcommand{Uf}{U_{!f}}

    begin{document}

    begin{align*}
    qr{psi_2}
    &= Uf qr{psi_1}\
    &= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
    bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3 +qr4
    +qr5 +qr6 + qr7bigr] qr0 qr0\
    &= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
    bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0
    +qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr7qr0bigr] qr0\
    &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
    bigl[Ufqr0qr0 + Ufqr1qr0 + Ufqr2qr0+Ufqr3qr0 \
    &qquadqquad
    + Ufqr4qr0+Ufqr5qr0+Ufqr6qr0
    + Ufqr7qr0bigr] qr0\
    &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
    bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + dots
    + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + dots + qr7qr1bigr] qr0,
    end{align*}
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer




























      2














      In addition to getting rid of the unneeded split environment, you may want to (a) typeset the U_f terms more compactly, i.e., as U_{!f}, (b) replace various left[ and right] directives with bigl[ and bigr], and (c) replace ... with dots.



      enter image description here



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{mathtools} % for 'DeclarePairedDelimiter' macro
      DeclarePairedDelimiterqrlvertrangle
      newcommand{Uf}{U_{!f}}

      begin{document}

      begin{align*}
      qr{psi_2}
      &= Uf qr{psi_1}\
      &= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
      bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3 +qr4
      +qr5 +qr6 + qr7bigr] qr0 qr0\
      &= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
      bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0
      +qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr7qr0bigr] qr0\
      &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
      bigl[Ufqr0qr0 + Ufqr1qr0 + Ufqr2qr0+Ufqr3qr0 \
      &qquadqquad
      + Ufqr4qr0+Ufqr5qr0+Ufqr6qr0
      + Ufqr7qr0bigr] qr0\
      &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
      bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + dots
      + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + dots + qr7qr1bigr] qr0,
      end{align*}
      end{document}





      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        In addition to getting rid of the unneeded split environment, you may want to (a) typeset the U_f terms more compactly, i.e., as U_{!f}, (b) replace various left[ and right] directives with bigl[ and bigr], and (c) replace ... with dots.



        enter image description here



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools} % for 'DeclarePairedDelimiter' macro
        DeclarePairedDelimiterqrlvertrangle
        newcommand{Uf}{U_{!f}}

        begin{document}

        begin{align*}
        qr{psi_2}
        &= Uf qr{psi_1}\
        &= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
        bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3 +qr4
        +qr5 +qr6 + qr7bigr] qr0 qr0\
        &= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
        bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0
        +qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr7qr0bigr] qr0\
        &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
        bigl[Ufqr0qr0 + Ufqr1qr0 + Ufqr2qr0+Ufqr3qr0 \
        &qquadqquad
        + Ufqr4qr0+Ufqr5qr0+Ufqr6qr0
        + Ufqr7qr0bigr] qr0\
        &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
        bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + dots
        + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + dots + qr7qr1bigr] qr0,
        end{align*}
        end{document}





        share|improve this answer













        In addition to getting rid of the unneeded split environment, you may want to (a) typeset the U_f terms more compactly, i.e., as U_{!f}, (b) replace various left[ and right] directives with bigl[ and bigr], and (c) replace ... with dots.



        enter image description here



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{mathtools} % for 'DeclarePairedDelimiter' macro
        DeclarePairedDelimiterqrlvertrangle
        newcommand{Uf}{U_{!f}}

        begin{document}

        begin{align*}
        qr{psi_2}
        &= Uf qr{psi_1}\
        &= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
        bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3 +qr4
        +qr5 +qr6 + qr7bigr] qr0 qr0\
        &= Uf frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
        bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0
        +qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr7qr0bigr] qr0\
        &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
        bigl[Ufqr0qr0 + Ufqr1qr0 + Ufqr2qr0+Ufqr3qr0 \
        &qquadqquad
        + Ufqr4qr0+Ufqr5qr0+Ufqr6qr0
        + Ufqr7qr0bigr] qr0\
        &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}
        bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + dots
        + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + dots + qr7qr1bigr] qr0,
        end{align*}
        end{document}






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        MicoMico

        280k31381770




        280k31381770























            1














            I suggest using the multlined environment from mathtools, and the DeclarePairedDelimiter command from the same package, which will produce scaling , qr and ql:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{mathtools}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXnorm[1]lVertrVert{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXPP{twonorm }[1]{}{lVert}{rVert}{_{2}}{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXq[2]{langle}{rangle}%
            {#1,delimsizevert,mathopen{}#2}
            DeclarePairedDelimiter{qr}vertrangle
            DeclarePairedDelimiter{ql}langle rvert
            DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

            begin{document}

            begin{align*}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}bigr] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0bigr] qr0\
            &= begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
            qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0bigr] qr0
            end{multlined}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1bigr] qr0,
            end{align*}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer


























            • The left and right directives don't succeed in making "big" square brackets -- better to use bigl[ and bigr], right? :-)

              – Mico
              3 hours ago











            • That's right. Actually, I didn't think about this problem, but I see I should have, to make the formula a little less unpleasant to read. I'll fix that. Thanks!

              – Bernard
              3 hours ago
















            1














            I suggest using the multlined environment from mathtools, and the DeclarePairedDelimiter command from the same package, which will produce scaling , qr and ql:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{mathtools}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXnorm[1]lVertrVert{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXPP{twonorm }[1]{}{lVert}{rVert}{_{2}}{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXq[2]{langle}{rangle}%
            {#1,delimsizevert,mathopen{}#2}
            DeclarePairedDelimiter{qr}vertrangle
            DeclarePairedDelimiter{ql}langle rvert
            DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

            begin{document}

            begin{align*}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}bigr] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0bigr] qr0\
            &= begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
            qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0bigr] qr0
            end{multlined}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1bigr] qr0,
            end{align*}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer


























            • The left and right directives don't succeed in making "big" square brackets -- better to use bigl[ and bigr], right? :-)

              – Mico
              3 hours ago











            • That's right. Actually, I didn't think about this problem, but I see I should have, to make the formula a little less unpleasant to read. I'll fix that. Thanks!

              – Bernard
              3 hours ago














            1












            1








            1







            I suggest using the multlined environment from mathtools, and the DeclarePairedDelimiter command from the same package, which will produce scaling , qr and ql:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{mathtools}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXnorm[1]lVertrVert{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXPP{twonorm }[1]{}{lVert}{rVert}{_{2}}{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXq[2]{langle}{rangle}%
            {#1,delimsizevert,mathopen{}#2}
            DeclarePairedDelimiter{qr}vertrangle
            DeclarePairedDelimiter{ql}langle rvert
            DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

            begin{document}

            begin{align*}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}bigr] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0bigr] qr0\
            &= begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
            qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0bigr] qr0
            end{multlined}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1bigr] qr0,
            end{align*}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer















            I suggest using the multlined environment from mathtools, and the DeclarePairedDelimiter command from the same package, which will produce scaling , qr and ql:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{mathtools}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXnorm[1]lVertrVert{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXPP{twonorm }[1]{}{lVert}{rVert}{_{2}}{ifblank{#1}{: · :}{#1}}
            DeclarePairedDelimiterXq[2]{langle}{rangle}%
            {#1,delimsizevert,mathopen{}#2}
            DeclarePairedDelimiter{qr}vertrangle
            DeclarePairedDelimiter{ql}langle rvert
            DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

            begin{document}

            begin{align*}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}bigr] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0bigr] qr0\
            &= begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} bigl[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
            qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0bigr] qr0
            end{multlined}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}}bigl[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1bigr] qr0,
            end{align*}

            end{document}


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago

























            answered 4 hours ago









            BernardBernard

            171k775202




            171k775202













            • The left and right directives don't succeed in making "big" square brackets -- better to use bigl[ and bigr], right? :-)

              – Mico
              3 hours ago











            • That's right. Actually, I didn't think about this problem, but I see I should have, to make the formula a little less unpleasant to read. I'll fix that. Thanks!

              – Bernard
              3 hours ago



















            • The left and right directives don't succeed in making "big" square brackets -- better to use bigl[ and bigr], right? :-)

              – Mico
              3 hours ago











            • That's right. Actually, I didn't think about this problem, but I see I should have, to make the formula a little less unpleasant to read. I'll fix that. Thanks!

              – Bernard
              3 hours ago

















            The left and right directives don't succeed in making "big" square brackets -- better to use bigl[ and bigr], right? :-)

            – Mico
            3 hours ago





            The left and right directives don't succeed in making "big" square brackets -- better to use bigl[ and bigr], right? :-)

            – Mico
            3 hours ago













            That's right. Actually, I didn't think about this problem, but I see I should have, to make the formula a little less unpleasant to read. I'll fix that. Thanks!

            – Bernard
            3 hours ago





            That's right. Actually, I didn't think about this problem, but I see I should have, to make the formula a little less unpleasant to read. I'll fix that. Thanks!

            – Bernard
            3 hours ago











            0














            I think the reason you are getting this result is that the second linebreak inside the split environment should be outside, like this:



            begin{align*}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
            begin{split}
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \
            &qquadqquad + U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
            end{split}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
            end{align*}


            Besides the recomendations given in Bernard's answer, I'd also suggest using the split environment inside equation* instead of align*, since it seems you're trying to typeset just one (albeit multi-line) equation:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            newcommand{q}[2]{langle #1 | #2 rangle}
            newcommand{qr}[1]{|#1rangle}
            newcommand{ql}[1]{langle #1|}
            DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

            begin{document}

            begin{equation*}
            begin{split}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
            &=!begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
            qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
            end{multlined}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
            end{split}
            end{equation*}

            end{document}





            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Vinicius M. G. Silveira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.
















            • 1





              But how to align the equal signs within equation? align is appropriate here.

              – Sigur
              3 hours ago













            • I forgot to add that I'd recomend using the split environment to align the equal signs and the multlined environment to break one the lines into two.

              – Vinicius M. G. Silveira
              3 hours ago
















            0














            I think the reason you are getting this result is that the second linebreak inside the split environment should be outside, like this:



            begin{align*}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
            begin{split}
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \
            &qquadqquad + U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
            end{split}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
            end{align*}


            Besides the recomendations given in Bernard's answer, I'd also suggest using the split environment inside equation* instead of align*, since it seems you're trying to typeset just one (albeit multi-line) equation:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            newcommand{q}[2]{langle #1 | #2 rangle}
            newcommand{qr}[1]{|#1rangle}
            newcommand{ql}[1]{langle #1|}
            DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

            begin{document}

            begin{equation*}
            begin{split}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
            &=!begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
            qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
            end{multlined}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
            end{split}
            end{equation*}

            end{document}





            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Vinicius M. G. Silveira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.
















            • 1





              But how to align the equal signs within equation? align is appropriate here.

              – Sigur
              3 hours ago













            • I forgot to add that I'd recomend using the split environment to align the equal signs and the multlined environment to break one the lines into two.

              – Vinicius M. G. Silveira
              3 hours ago














            0












            0








            0







            I think the reason you are getting this result is that the second linebreak inside the split environment should be outside, like this:



            begin{align*}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
            begin{split}
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \
            &qquadqquad + U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
            end{split}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
            end{align*}


            Besides the recomendations given in Bernard's answer, I'd also suggest using the split environment inside equation* instead of align*, since it seems you're trying to typeset just one (albeit multi-line) equation:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            newcommand{q}[2]{langle #1 | #2 rangle}
            newcommand{qr}[1]{|#1rangle}
            newcommand{ql}[1]{langle #1|}
            DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

            begin{document}

            begin{equation*}
            begin{split}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
            &=!begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
            qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
            end{multlined}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
            end{split}
            end{equation*}

            end{document}





            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Vinicius M. G. Silveira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.










            I think the reason you are getting this result is that the second linebreak inside the split environment should be outside, like this:



            begin{align*}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
            begin{split}
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \
            &qquadqquad + U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
            end{split}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
            end{align*}


            Besides the recomendations given in Bernard's answer, I'd also suggest using the split environment inside equation* instead of align*, since it seems you're trying to typeset just one (albeit multi-line) equation:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            newcommand{q}[2]{langle #1 | #2 rangle}
            newcommand{qr}[1]{|#1rangle}
            newcommand{ql}[1]{langle #1|}
            DeclareMathOperator{mdc}{mdc}

            begin{document}

            begin{equation*}
            begin{split}
            qr{psi_2} &= U_f qr{psi_1}\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0 + qr1 + qr2+qr3+qr4+qr5+qr6 + qr{7}right] qr0 qr0\
            &= U_f frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr0 + qr1qr0 + qr2qr0+qr3qr0+qr4qr0+qr5qr0+qr6qr0 + qr{7}qr0right] qr0\
            &=!begin{multlined}[t] frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} big[U_fqr0qr0 + U_fqr1qr0 + U_fqr2qr0+U_fqr3qr0 \[-1.5ex]
            qquad+ U_fqr4qr0+U_fqr5qr0+U_fqr6qr0 + U_fqr{7}qr0big] qr0
            end{multlined}\
            &= frac{1}{sqrt{2^4}} left[qr0qr2 + qr1qr4 + ... + qr{i}qr{f(i)} + ... + qr{7}qr1right] qr0,
            end{split}
            end{equation*}

            end{document}






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Vinicius M. G. Silveira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago





















            New contributor




            Vinicius M. G. Silveira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 3 hours ago









            Vinicius M. G. SilveiraVinicius M. G. Silveira

            12




            12




            New contributor




            Vinicius M. G. Silveira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Vinicius M. G. Silveira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Vinicius M. G. Silveira is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            • 1





              But how to align the equal signs within equation? align is appropriate here.

              – Sigur
              3 hours ago













            • I forgot to add that I'd recomend using the split environment to align the equal signs and the multlined environment to break one the lines into two.

              – Vinicius M. G. Silveira
              3 hours ago














            • 1





              But how to align the equal signs within equation? align is appropriate here.

              – Sigur
              3 hours ago













            • I forgot to add that I'd recomend using the split environment to align the equal signs and the multlined environment to break one the lines into two.

              – Vinicius M. G. Silveira
              3 hours ago








            1




            1





            But how to align the equal signs within equation? align is appropriate here.

            – Sigur
            3 hours ago







            But how to align the equal signs within equation? align is appropriate here.

            – Sigur
            3 hours ago















            I forgot to add that I'd recomend using the split environment to align the equal signs and the multlined environment to break one the lines into two.

            – Vinicius M. G. Silveira
            3 hours ago





            I forgot to add that I'd recomend using the split environment to align the equal signs and the multlined environment to break one the lines into two.

            – Vinicius M. G. Silveira
            3 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476218%2fwhat-am-i-doing-wrong-in-this-use-of-split%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Szabolcs (Ungheria) Altri progetti | Menu di navigazione48°10′14.56″N 21°29′33.14″E /...

            Discografia di Klaus Schulze Indice Album in studio | Album dal vivo | Singoli | Antologie | Colonne...

            How to make inet_server_addr() return localhost in spite of ::1/128RETURN NEXT in Postgres FunctionConnect to...