Equilibrium constant for the neutralization of weak acid by strong baseAcid dissociation constant and...

How many copper coins fit inside a cubic foot?

How can I give a Ranger advantage on a check due to Favored Enemy without spoiling the story for the player?

Why does this quiz question say that protons and electrons do not combine to form neutrons?

Why write a book when there's a movie in my head?

Missing a connection and don't have money to book next flight

What does "move past people" mean in this context?

How do I make my single-minded character more interested in the main story?

Integer but not Laurent sequences

How can I keep my gold safe from other PCs?

Is practicing on a digital piano harmful to an experienced piano player?

How do I fight with Heavy Armor as a Wizard with Tenser's Transformation?

Is layered encryption more secure than long passwords?

Do the speed limit reductions due to pollution also apply to electric cars in France?

Will the duration of traveling to Ceres using the same tech developed for going to Mars be proportional to the distance to go to Mars or not?

What could cause an entire planet of humans to become aphasic?

Was Opportunity's last message to Earth "My battery is low and it's getting dark"?

Two oatmeal pies a day keep the doctor away?

What really causes series inductance of capacitors?

Disk space full during insert, what happens?

Why don't programs completely uninstall (remove all their files) when I remove them?

What is formjacking?

What does "south of due west" mean?

Was the Spartan by Mimic Systems a real product?

Is there a way to pause a running process on Linux systems and resume later?



Equilibrium constant for the neutralization of weak acid by strong base


Acid dissociation constant and equilibrium constantHow to calculate the equilibrium constant for an esterification?Neutralization reaction with insoluble salt (weak acid, strong base)?Why is water not part of the equilibrium constant?When do I use the hydronium ion in an acid-base equation?Calculating the pH of the endpoint in a titration of weak acid and strong baseWhy is the hydrolysis of the conjugate base of a weak acid neglected in buffer solutions?Acid-base titration: Calculate pKa with only three values givenCalculating PH of solution after adding strong acid (equilibrium)How to calculate the equilibrium constant of acetic acid-hydroxide ion equilibrium?













1












$begingroup$



Acetic acid has a $K_mathrm{a}$ of $pu{1.8e-5}$. What is the equilibrium constant for the neutralization of this acid with $ce{NaOH}$?




Given acetic acid



$$ce{HC2H3O2 + H2O <=> C2H3O2- + H3O+} qquad K_mathrm{a} = pu{1.8e-5}$$



$$ce{HC2H3O2 + OH- <=> C2H3O2- + H2O}$$



So, if we do $K_mathrm{w} = K_mathrm{a}K_mathrm{b}$, then we get $K_mathrm{b} = pu{5.55e-10}$. How do I use this to find $K_mathrm{eq}$?



I know how to find $K_mathrm{eq}$ using concentration, but I am unsure how to approach this further. The hint says consider the ion product of water, but what does this mean?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Avarosa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$



    Acetic acid has a $K_mathrm{a}$ of $pu{1.8e-5}$. What is the equilibrium constant for the neutralization of this acid with $ce{NaOH}$?




    Given acetic acid



    $$ce{HC2H3O2 + H2O <=> C2H3O2- + H3O+} qquad K_mathrm{a} = pu{1.8e-5}$$



    $$ce{HC2H3O2 + OH- <=> C2H3O2- + H2O}$$



    So, if we do $K_mathrm{w} = K_mathrm{a}K_mathrm{b}$, then we get $K_mathrm{b} = pu{5.55e-10}$. How do I use this to find $K_mathrm{eq}$?



    I know how to find $K_mathrm{eq}$ using concentration, but I am unsure how to approach this further. The hint says consider the ion product of water, but what does this mean?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Avarosa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$



      Acetic acid has a $K_mathrm{a}$ of $pu{1.8e-5}$. What is the equilibrium constant for the neutralization of this acid with $ce{NaOH}$?




      Given acetic acid



      $$ce{HC2H3O2 + H2O <=> C2H3O2- + H3O+} qquad K_mathrm{a} = pu{1.8e-5}$$



      $$ce{HC2H3O2 + OH- <=> C2H3O2- + H2O}$$



      So, if we do $K_mathrm{w} = K_mathrm{a}K_mathrm{b}$, then we get $K_mathrm{b} = pu{5.55e-10}$. How do I use this to find $K_mathrm{eq}$?



      I know how to find $K_mathrm{eq}$ using concentration, but I am unsure how to approach this further. The hint says consider the ion product of water, but what does this mean?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Avarosa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$





      Acetic acid has a $K_mathrm{a}$ of $pu{1.8e-5}$. What is the equilibrium constant for the neutralization of this acid with $ce{NaOH}$?




      Given acetic acid



      $$ce{HC2H3O2 + H2O <=> C2H3O2- + H3O+} qquad K_mathrm{a} = pu{1.8e-5}$$



      $$ce{HC2H3O2 + OH- <=> C2H3O2- + H2O}$$



      So, if we do $K_mathrm{w} = K_mathrm{a}K_mathrm{b}$, then we get $K_mathrm{b} = pu{5.55e-10}$. How do I use this to find $K_mathrm{eq}$?



      I know how to find $K_mathrm{eq}$ using concentration, but I am unsure how to approach this further. The hint says consider the ion product of water, but what does this mean?







      acid-base equilibrium aqueous-solution






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Avarosa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Avarosa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      andselisk

      16.5k654115




      16.5k654115






      New contributor




      Avarosa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      AvarosaAvarosa

      61




      61




      New contributor




      Avarosa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Avarosa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Avarosa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Sodium hydroxide is a strong base and is supposed to be fully dissociated.
          You then should've started by writing down the neutralization reaction itself for which you have to determine the equilibrium constant $K$ and unravel a tangle from there:



          $$ce{HOAc + OH- <=> OAc- + H2O}$$



          $$K' = frac{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H2O}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          Since $[ce{H2O}] = text{const}$ (reaction medium), $K'[ce{H2O}] = K = text{const}$:



          $$K = frac{[ce{OAc-}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          By multiplying both numerator and denominator by $[ce{H+}]$, you can find out that the constant for the neutralization of a weak acid solely depends on the relation between its dissociation constant $K_mathrm{a}$ and ionic product of water $K_mathrm{w}$:



          $$K = frac{color{red}{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H+}]}}{color{red}{[ce{HOAc}]}[ce{OH-}][ce{H+}]} = frac{color{red}{K_mathrm{a}}}{K_mathrm{w}}$$



          For acetic acid:



          $$K = frac{pu{1.8e-5}}{pu{1e-14}} = pu{1.8e9}$$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            wait so is keq always equal to ka/kw and would the same apply for kb/kw? From my understanding we setup the reaction kb and saw that it is similar to keq but is only lacking H+. So by multiplying in our H+ we see that it is also has our ka equation so we then can say ka/kw? Thank you for your help, truly I am so confused in this chapter and its hard stringing all these k's together.
            $endgroup$
            – Avarosa
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No, Keq should be determined from the equilibrium for each given situation. Remembering some formulas won't help, or at least you should understand on what premise they've been derived. That's why I edited the title of your question to cover the cases where this formula works: weak monobasic acids neutralized by strong alkali.
            $endgroup$
            – andselisk
            2 hours ago













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "431"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Avarosa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109948%2fequilibrium-constant-for-the-neutralization-of-weak-acid-by-strong-base%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Sodium hydroxide is a strong base and is supposed to be fully dissociated.
          You then should've started by writing down the neutralization reaction itself for which you have to determine the equilibrium constant $K$ and unravel a tangle from there:



          $$ce{HOAc + OH- <=> OAc- + H2O}$$



          $$K' = frac{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H2O}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          Since $[ce{H2O}] = text{const}$ (reaction medium), $K'[ce{H2O}] = K = text{const}$:



          $$K = frac{[ce{OAc-}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          By multiplying both numerator and denominator by $[ce{H+}]$, you can find out that the constant for the neutralization of a weak acid solely depends on the relation between its dissociation constant $K_mathrm{a}$ and ionic product of water $K_mathrm{w}$:



          $$K = frac{color{red}{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H+}]}}{color{red}{[ce{HOAc}]}[ce{OH-}][ce{H+}]} = frac{color{red}{K_mathrm{a}}}{K_mathrm{w}}$$



          For acetic acid:



          $$K = frac{pu{1.8e-5}}{pu{1e-14}} = pu{1.8e9}$$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            wait so is keq always equal to ka/kw and would the same apply for kb/kw? From my understanding we setup the reaction kb and saw that it is similar to keq but is only lacking H+. So by multiplying in our H+ we see that it is also has our ka equation so we then can say ka/kw? Thank you for your help, truly I am so confused in this chapter and its hard stringing all these k's together.
            $endgroup$
            – Avarosa
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No, Keq should be determined from the equilibrium for each given situation. Remembering some formulas won't help, or at least you should understand on what premise they've been derived. That's why I edited the title of your question to cover the cases where this formula works: weak monobasic acids neutralized by strong alkali.
            $endgroup$
            – andselisk
            2 hours ago


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Sodium hydroxide is a strong base and is supposed to be fully dissociated.
          You then should've started by writing down the neutralization reaction itself for which you have to determine the equilibrium constant $K$ and unravel a tangle from there:



          $$ce{HOAc + OH- <=> OAc- + H2O}$$



          $$K' = frac{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H2O}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          Since $[ce{H2O}] = text{const}$ (reaction medium), $K'[ce{H2O}] = K = text{const}$:



          $$K = frac{[ce{OAc-}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          By multiplying both numerator and denominator by $[ce{H+}]$, you can find out that the constant for the neutralization of a weak acid solely depends on the relation between its dissociation constant $K_mathrm{a}$ and ionic product of water $K_mathrm{w}$:



          $$K = frac{color{red}{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H+}]}}{color{red}{[ce{HOAc}]}[ce{OH-}][ce{H+}]} = frac{color{red}{K_mathrm{a}}}{K_mathrm{w}}$$



          For acetic acid:



          $$K = frac{pu{1.8e-5}}{pu{1e-14}} = pu{1.8e9}$$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            wait so is keq always equal to ka/kw and would the same apply for kb/kw? From my understanding we setup the reaction kb and saw that it is similar to keq but is only lacking H+. So by multiplying in our H+ we see that it is also has our ka equation so we then can say ka/kw? Thank you for your help, truly I am so confused in this chapter and its hard stringing all these k's together.
            $endgroup$
            – Avarosa
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No, Keq should be determined from the equilibrium for each given situation. Remembering some formulas won't help, or at least you should understand on what premise they've been derived. That's why I edited the title of your question to cover the cases where this formula works: weak monobasic acids neutralized by strong alkali.
            $endgroup$
            – andselisk
            2 hours ago
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Sodium hydroxide is a strong base and is supposed to be fully dissociated.
          You then should've started by writing down the neutralization reaction itself for which you have to determine the equilibrium constant $K$ and unravel a tangle from there:



          $$ce{HOAc + OH- <=> OAc- + H2O}$$



          $$K' = frac{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H2O}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          Since $[ce{H2O}] = text{const}$ (reaction medium), $K'[ce{H2O}] = K = text{const}$:



          $$K = frac{[ce{OAc-}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          By multiplying both numerator and denominator by $[ce{H+}]$, you can find out that the constant for the neutralization of a weak acid solely depends on the relation between its dissociation constant $K_mathrm{a}$ and ionic product of water $K_mathrm{w}$:



          $$K = frac{color{red}{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H+}]}}{color{red}{[ce{HOAc}]}[ce{OH-}][ce{H+}]} = frac{color{red}{K_mathrm{a}}}{K_mathrm{w}}$$



          For acetic acid:



          $$K = frac{pu{1.8e-5}}{pu{1e-14}} = pu{1.8e9}$$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Sodium hydroxide is a strong base and is supposed to be fully dissociated.
          You then should've started by writing down the neutralization reaction itself for which you have to determine the equilibrium constant $K$ and unravel a tangle from there:



          $$ce{HOAc + OH- <=> OAc- + H2O}$$



          $$K' = frac{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H2O}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          Since $[ce{H2O}] = text{const}$ (reaction medium), $K'[ce{H2O}] = K = text{const}$:



          $$K = frac{[ce{OAc-}]}{[ce{HOAc}][ce{OH-}]}$$



          By multiplying both numerator and denominator by $[ce{H+}]$, you can find out that the constant for the neutralization of a weak acid solely depends on the relation between its dissociation constant $K_mathrm{a}$ and ionic product of water $K_mathrm{w}$:



          $$K = frac{color{red}{[ce{OAc-}][ce{H+}]}}{color{red}{[ce{HOAc}]}[ce{OH-}][ce{H+}]} = frac{color{red}{K_mathrm{a}}}{K_mathrm{w}}$$



          For acetic acid:



          $$K = frac{pu{1.8e-5}}{pu{1e-14}} = pu{1.8e9}$$







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 3 hours ago









          andseliskandselisk

          16.5k654115




          16.5k654115












          • $begingroup$
            wait so is keq always equal to ka/kw and would the same apply for kb/kw? From my understanding we setup the reaction kb and saw that it is similar to keq but is only lacking H+. So by multiplying in our H+ we see that it is also has our ka equation so we then can say ka/kw? Thank you for your help, truly I am so confused in this chapter and its hard stringing all these k's together.
            $endgroup$
            – Avarosa
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No, Keq should be determined from the equilibrium for each given situation. Remembering some formulas won't help, or at least you should understand on what premise they've been derived. That's why I edited the title of your question to cover the cases where this formula works: weak monobasic acids neutralized by strong alkali.
            $endgroup$
            – andselisk
            2 hours ago




















          • $begingroup$
            wait so is keq always equal to ka/kw and would the same apply for kb/kw? From my understanding we setup the reaction kb and saw that it is similar to keq but is only lacking H+. So by multiplying in our H+ we see that it is also has our ka equation so we then can say ka/kw? Thank you for your help, truly I am so confused in this chapter and its hard stringing all these k's together.
            $endgroup$
            – Avarosa
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            No, Keq should be determined from the equilibrium for each given situation. Remembering some formulas won't help, or at least you should understand on what premise they've been derived. That's why I edited the title of your question to cover the cases where this formula works: weak monobasic acids neutralized by strong alkali.
            $endgroup$
            – andselisk
            2 hours ago


















          $begingroup$
          wait so is keq always equal to ka/kw and would the same apply for kb/kw? From my understanding we setup the reaction kb and saw that it is similar to keq but is only lacking H+. So by multiplying in our H+ we see that it is also has our ka equation so we then can say ka/kw? Thank you for your help, truly I am so confused in this chapter and its hard stringing all these k's together.
          $endgroup$
          – Avarosa
          2 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          wait so is keq always equal to ka/kw and would the same apply for kb/kw? From my understanding we setup the reaction kb and saw that it is similar to keq but is only lacking H+. So by multiplying in our H+ we see that it is also has our ka equation so we then can say ka/kw? Thank you for your help, truly I am so confused in this chapter and its hard stringing all these k's together.
          $endgroup$
          – Avarosa
          2 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          No, Keq should be determined from the equilibrium for each given situation. Remembering some formulas won't help, or at least you should understand on what premise they've been derived. That's why I edited the title of your question to cover the cases where this formula works: weak monobasic acids neutralized by strong alkali.
          $endgroup$
          – andselisk
          2 hours ago






          $begingroup$
          No, Keq should be determined from the equilibrium for each given situation. Remembering some formulas won't help, or at least you should understand on what premise they've been derived. That's why I edited the title of your question to cover the cases where this formula works: weak monobasic acids neutralized by strong alkali.
          $endgroup$
          – andselisk
          2 hours ago












          Avarosa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Avarosa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Avarosa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Avarosa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109948%2fequilibrium-constant-for-the-neutralization-of-weak-acid-by-strong-base%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Szabolcs (Ungheria) Altri progetti | Menu di navigazione48°10′14.56″N 21°29′33.14″E /...

          Discografia di Klaus Schulze Indice Album in studio | Album dal vivo | Singoli | Antologie | Colonne...

          How to make inet_server_addr() return localhost in spite of ::1/128RETURN NEXT in Postgres FunctionConnect to...