Too many VLFs - How do I truncate them?How to know when/if I have too many indexes?How important are...
How can I automatically launch GPSD on startup?
Is Screenshot Time-tracking Common?
How can I prevent an oracle who can see into the past from knowing everything that has happened?
Why might frozen potatoes require a hechsher?
How to not let the Identify spell spoil everything?
Coworker asking me to not bring cakes due to self control issue. What should I do?
Why did Ylvis use "go" instead of "say" in phrases like "Dog goes 'woof'"?
Is it possible to detect 100% of SQLi with a simple regex?
Count repetitions of an array
Who is credited for the syntax tree in synthetic linguistics
Why is "rm -r" unable to delete this folder?
Sensor logger for Raspberry Pi in a stratospheric probe
How much light is too much?
Growth of Mordell-Weil Rank of Elliptic Curves over Field Extensions
When using Volatility with a memory image, what is the Kernel version?
How can find the 2D Voronoi cell area distribution?
How many proficiencies and languages does a noble half-elf Knowledge Domain cleric start with?
Where does documentation like business and software requirement spec docs fit in an agile project?
No option to ask a question in https://developer.salesforce.com discussion forums
How can I give a Ranger advantage on a check due to Favored Enemy without spoiling the story for the player?
Piano music notation conventions
Can I travel from country A to country B to country C without going back to country A?
Writing dialogues for characters whose first language is not English
Modern Algebraic Geometry and Analytic Number Theory
Too many VLFs - How do I truncate them?
How to know when/if I have too many indexes?How important are transaction log VLFs for performance?Virtual Log Files (VLFs) FragmentationWhat's worse, too many entities or too many tables?How to handle too many inserts?Unable to shrink log file due to snapshot replicationPivots giving too many resultsHow many log files does a database usually have?How many internal drives are too many?MySQL `innodb_log_file_size`: how big is too big?
I have a database that has log file of around 64 GB and the VLF count for the same is 500+. Almost all of them are active. I checked the open transactions and the oldest transaction on that database is from two days back. The session for that transaction is in SUSPENDED state. So, if I kill this SPID, will it mark the VLFs as INACTIVE ? Or will it go into roll back mode and run for another couple of days without marking the VLFs as INACTIVE?
I am not even able to identify from where this transaction is originated. The host name just displays a web server and the Program Name has .Net SqlClient Data Provider so this looks like some transaction initiated by some code in the application.
sql-server transaction-log
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 6 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I have a database that has log file of around 64 GB and the VLF count for the same is 500+. Almost all of them are active. I checked the open transactions and the oldest transaction on that database is from two days back. The session for that transaction is in SUSPENDED state. So, if I kill this SPID, will it mark the VLFs as INACTIVE ? Or will it go into roll back mode and run for another couple of days without marking the VLFs as INACTIVE?
I am not even able to identify from where this transaction is originated. The host name just displays a web server and the Program Name has .Net SqlClient Data Provider so this looks like some transaction initiated by some code in the application.
sql-server transaction-log
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 6 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I have a database that has log file of around 64 GB and the VLF count for the same is 500+. Almost all of them are active. I checked the open transactions and the oldest transaction on that database is from two days back. The session for that transaction is in SUSPENDED state. So, if I kill this SPID, will it mark the VLFs as INACTIVE ? Or will it go into roll back mode and run for another couple of days without marking the VLFs as INACTIVE?
I am not even able to identify from where this transaction is originated. The host name just displays a web server and the Program Name has .Net SqlClient Data Provider so this looks like some transaction initiated by some code in the application.
sql-server transaction-log
I have a database that has log file of around 64 GB and the VLF count for the same is 500+. Almost all of them are active. I checked the open transactions and the oldest transaction on that database is from two days back. The session for that transaction is in SUSPENDED state. So, if I kill this SPID, will it mark the VLFs as INACTIVE ? Or will it go into roll back mode and run for another couple of days without marking the VLFs as INACTIVE?
I am not even able to identify from where this transaction is originated. The host name just displays a web server and the Program Name has .Net SqlClient Data Provider so this looks like some transaction initiated by some code in the application.
sql-server transaction-log
sql-server transaction-log
asked Oct 20 '16 at 23:41
karun_rkarun_r
156312
156312
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 6 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 6 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Download and install the dbo.sp_WhoIsActive stored procedure from http://whoisactive.com
Run this procedure and it will tell you what is currently running. It will also tell you a host of further information such as what the current sessions are waiting on and where they originate from.
To answer the title of your question. To reduce the number of VLF, you need to shrink your log file using DBCC SHRINKFILE, then grow your log file back to 64GB in 16GB increments to give you 64 VLF.
Question - any reason behind suggesting this number of VLFs?
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 10:05
There is no absolute correct answer for the number of VLF. You just don't want to have thousands or tens of thousands as this can negatively impact recovery time.
– Andy Jones
Oct 21 '16 at 10:57
1
I know more or less official recommendations, was curious about Your 64 VLF number, as it's rather on the opposite end - too few of them, especially for that size of log file.
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 12:03
Just a comment, I asked in one of Brent Ozar's office hours at what quantity a dba should be concerned about the high number of vlfs. They replied that anything over 5000 is something to be concerned with especially regarding Andy's comment above with recovery times. To remove an excessive number of vlfs, we chg the recovery model to simple, shrink the log, chg back to full, then take a full backup.
– rvsc48
Oct 21 '16 at 13:56
@MarcinS. My general aim is for around 200 VLFs. 64GB is not a large log file by any stretch of the imagination, so 64 is an acceptable number of VLFs.
– Randolph West
Oct 21 '16 at 20:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152933%2ftoo-many-vlfs-how-do-i-truncate-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Download and install the dbo.sp_WhoIsActive stored procedure from http://whoisactive.com
Run this procedure and it will tell you what is currently running. It will also tell you a host of further information such as what the current sessions are waiting on and where they originate from.
To answer the title of your question. To reduce the number of VLF, you need to shrink your log file using DBCC SHRINKFILE, then grow your log file back to 64GB in 16GB increments to give you 64 VLF.
Question - any reason behind suggesting this number of VLFs?
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 10:05
There is no absolute correct answer for the number of VLF. You just don't want to have thousands or tens of thousands as this can negatively impact recovery time.
– Andy Jones
Oct 21 '16 at 10:57
1
I know more or less official recommendations, was curious about Your 64 VLF number, as it's rather on the opposite end - too few of them, especially for that size of log file.
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 12:03
Just a comment, I asked in one of Brent Ozar's office hours at what quantity a dba should be concerned about the high number of vlfs. They replied that anything over 5000 is something to be concerned with especially regarding Andy's comment above with recovery times. To remove an excessive number of vlfs, we chg the recovery model to simple, shrink the log, chg back to full, then take a full backup.
– rvsc48
Oct 21 '16 at 13:56
@MarcinS. My general aim is for around 200 VLFs. 64GB is not a large log file by any stretch of the imagination, so 64 is an acceptable number of VLFs.
– Randolph West
Oct 21 '16 at 20:10
add a comment |
Download and install the dbo.sp_WhoIsActive stored procedure from http://whoisactive.com
Run this procedure and it will tell you what is currently running. It will also tell you a host of further information such as what the current sessions are waiting on and where they originate from.
To answer the title of your question. To reduce the number of VLF, you need to shrink your log file using DBCC SHRINKFILE, then grow your log file back to 64GB in 16GB increments to give you 64 VLF.
Question - any reason behind suggesting this number of VLFs?
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 10:05
There is no absolute correct answer for the number of VLF. You just don't want to have thousands or tens of thousands as this can negatively impact recovery time.
– Andy Jones
Oct 21 '16 at 10:57
1
I know more or less official recommendations, was curious about Your 64 VLF number, as it's rather on the opposite end - too few of them, especially for that size of log file.
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 12:03
Just a comment, I asked in one of Brent Ozar's office hours at what quantity a dba should be concerned about the high number of vlfs. They replied that anything over 5000 is something to be concerned with especially regarding Andy's comment above with recovery times. To remove an excessive number of vlfs, we chg the recovery model to simple, shrink the log, chg back to full, then take a full backup.
– rvsc48
Oct 21 '16 at 13:56
@MarcinS. My general aim is for around 200 VLFs. 64GB is not a large log file by any stretch of the imagination, so 64 is an acceptable number of VLFs.
– Randolph West
Oct 21 '16 at 20:10
add a comment |
Download and install the dbo.sp_WhoIsActive stored procedure from http://whoisactive.com
Run this procedure and it will tell you what is currently running. It will also tell you a host of further information such as what the current sessions are waiting on and where they originate from.
To answer the title of your question. To reduce the number of VLF, you need to shrink your log file using DBCC SHRINKFILE, then grow your log file back to 64GB in 16GB increments to give you 64 VLF.
Download and install the dbo.sp_WhoIsActive stored procedure from http://whoisactive.com
Run this procedure and it will tell you what is currently running. It will also tell you a host of further information such as what the current sessions are waiting on and where they originate from.
To answer the title of your question. To reduce the number of VLF, you need to shrink your log file using DBCC SHRINKFILE, then grow your log file back to 64GB in 16GB increments to give you 64 VLF.
edited Nov 12 '18 at 17:14
Aaron Bertrand♦
152k18289489
152k18289489
answered Oct 21 '16 at 9:50
Andy JonesAndy Jones
1,24148
1,24148
Question - any reason behind suggesting this number of VLFs?
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 10:05
There is no absolute correct answer for the number of VLF. You just don't want to have thousands or tens of thousands as this can negatively impact recovery time.
– Andy Jones
Oct 21 '16 at 10:57
1
I know more or less official recommendations, was curious about Your 64 VLF number, as it's rather on the opposite end - too few of them, especially for that size of log file.
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 12:03
Just a comment, I asked in one of Brent Ozar's office hours at what quantity a dba should be concerned about the high number of vlfs. They replied that anything over 5000 is something to be concerned with especially regarding Andy's comment above with recovery times. To remove an excessive number of vlfs, we chg the recovery model to simple, shrink the log, chg back to full, then take a full backup.
– rvsc48
Oct 21 '16 at 13:56
@MarcinS. My general aim is for around 200 VLFs. 64GB is not a large log file by any stretch of the imagination, so 64 is an acceptable number of VLFs.
– Randolph West
Oct 21 '16 at 20:10
add a comment |
Question - any reason behind suggesting this number of VLFs?
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 10:05
There is no absolute correct answer for the number of VLF. You just don't want to have thousands or tens of thousands as this can negatively impact recovery time.
– Andy Jones
Oct 21 '16 at 10:57
1
I know more or less official recommendations, was curious about Your 64 VLF number, as it's rather on the opposite end - too few of them, especially for that size of log file.
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 12:03
Just a comment, I asked in one of Brent Ozar's office hours at what quantity a dba should be concerned about the high number of vlfs. They replied that anything over 5000 is something to be concerned with especially regarding Andy's comment above with recovery times. To remove an excessive number of vlfs, we chg the recovery model to simple, shrink the log, chg back to full, then take a full backup.
– rvsc48
Oct 21 '16 at 13:56
@MarcinS. My general aim is for around 200 VLFs. 64GB is not a large log file by any stretch of the imagination, so 64 is an acceptable number of VLFs.
– Randolph West
Oct 21 '16 at 20:10
Question - any reason behind suggesting this number of VLFs?
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 10:05
Question - any reason behind suggesting this number of VLFs?
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 10:05
There is no absolute correct answer for the number of VLF. You just don't want to have thousands or tens of thousands as this can negatively impact recovery time.
– Andy Jones
Oct 21 '16 at 10:57
There is no absolute correct answer for the number of VLF. You just don't want to have thousands or tens of thousands as this can negatively impact recovery time.
– Andy Jones
Oct 21 '16 at 10:57
1
1
I know more or less official recommendations, was curious about Your 64 VLF number, as it's rather on the opposite end - too few of them, especially for that size of log file.
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 12:03
I know more or less official recommendations, was curious about Your 64 VLF number, as it's rather on the opposite end - too few of them, especially for that size of log file.
– Marcin S.
Oct 21 '16 at 12:03
Just a comment, I asked in one of Brent Ozar's office hours at what quantity a dba should be concerned about the high number of vlfs. They replied that anything over 5000 is something to be concerned with especially regarding Andy's comment above with recovery times. To remove an excessive number of vlfs, we chg the recovery model to simple, shrink the log, chg back to full, then take a full backup.
– rvsc48
Oct 21 '16 at 13:56
Just a comment, I asked in one of Brent Ozar's office hours at what quantity a dba should be concerned about the high number of vlfs. They replied that anything over 5000 is something to be concerned with especially regarding Andy's comment above with recovery times. To remove an excessive number of vlfs, we chg the recovery model to simple, shrink the log, chg back to full, then take a full backup.
– rvsc48
Oct 21 '16 at 13:56
@MarcinS. My general aim is for around 200 VLFs. 64GB is not a large log file by any stretch of the imagination, so 64 is an acceptable number of VLFs.
– Randolph West
Oct 21 '16 at 20:10
@MarcinS. My general aim is for around 200 VLFs. 64GB is not a large log file by any stretch of the imagination, so 64 is an acceptable number of VLFs.
– Randolph West
Oct 21 '16 at 20:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152933%2ftoo-many-vlfs-how-do-i-truncate-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown