My job requires me to shuck oystersIs lying at a job interview breaking a precept?Are there any exceptions to...
Is it possible to narrate a novel in a faux-historical style without alienating the reader?
How many copper coins fit inside a cubic foot?
Minimum Viable Product for RTS game?
Is the UK legally prevented from having another referendum on Brexit?
How do I make my single-minded character more interested in the main story?
Expression for "unconsciously using words (or accents) used by a person you often talk with or listen to"?
Are one-line email responses considered disrespectful?
Do the speed limit reductions due to pollution also apply to electric cars in France?
Why don't programs completely uninstall (remove all their files) when I remove them?
Plotting Laguerre Gaussian beam intensity in transverse and line profile via center?
How can I give a Ranger advantage on a check due to Favored Enemy without spoiling the story for the player?
Taking an academic pseudonym?
How to transport 10,000 terrestrial trolls across ocean fast?
1990s-2000s horror alien movie with slugs infecting people through the mouth
Why would you use 2 alternate layout buttons instead of 1, when only one can be selected at once
Can a planet be tidally unlocked?
Was Opportunity's last message to Earth "My battery is low and it's getting dark"?
How can I make my enemies feel real and make combat more engaging?
Integer but not Laurent sequences
My job requires me to shuck oysters
Why aren't passengers instructed how to lift aisle armrests?
Does Plato's "Ring of Gyges" have a corrupting influence on its wearer?
What is an efficient way to digitize a family photo collection?
How can changes in personality/values of a person who turned into a vampire be explained?
My job requires me to shuck oysters
Is lying at a job interview breaking a precept?Are there any exceptions to the first precept?Is it a sin to organize liqour & meat on cutomer request as a prt of my job?
I am not necessarily buddhist but i am a vegan and killing doesnt sit well with me. I have suffered terrible sleep condition over the past 2 years and cant work in my field anymore and have no experience in any other field and have a hard time getting to work at an early time so midday work is best for me. Unfortunately the restaurant i work at currently has oysters for sale and they are alive when you prepare them which involves killing them. I dont know how to rationalize this but i am struggling financially and am working on getting a different restaurant job where they might not serve this dish. But i have killed some oysters already. How do i come to terms with this?
karma killing
New contributor
add a comment |
I am not necessarily buddhist but i am a vegan and killing doesnt sit well with me. I have suffered terrible sleep condition over the past 2 years and cant work in my field anymore and have no experience in any other field and have a hard time getting to work at an early time so midday work is best for me. Unfortunately the restaurant i work at currently has oysters for sale and they are alive when you prepare them which involves killing them. I dont know how to rationalize this but i am struggling financially and am working on getting a different restaurant job where they might not serve this dish. But i have killed some oysters already. How do i come to terms with this?
karma killing
New contributor
add a comment |
I am not necessarily buddhist but i am a vegan and killing doesnt sit well with me. I have suffered terrible sleep condition over the past 2 years and cant work in my field anymore and have no experience in any other field and have a hard time getting to work at an early time so midday work is best for me. Unfortunately the restaurant i work at currently has oysters for sale and they are alive when you prepare them which involves killing them. I dont know how to rationalize this but i am struggling financially and am working on getting a different restaurant job where they might not serve this dish. But i have killed some oysters already. How do i come to terms with this?
karma killing
New contributor
I am not necessarily buddhist but i am a vegan and killing doesnt sit well with me. I have suffered terrible sleep condition over the past 2 years and cant work in my field anymore and have no experience in any other field and have a hard time getting to work at an early time so midday work is best for me. Unfortunately the restaurant i work at currently has oysters for sale and they are alive when you prepare them which involves killing them. I dont know how to rationalize this but i am struggling financially and am working on getting a different restaurant job where they might not serve this dish. But i have killed some oysters already. How do i come to terms with this?
karma killing
karma killing
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
NathanNathan
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.
Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?
[Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]
New contributor
add a comment |
The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.
add a comment |
According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).
However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.
If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.
Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.
Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)
Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)
Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
offense. (Pc 61)
Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
62)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "565"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Nathan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31247%2fmy-job-requires-me-to-shuck-oysters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.
Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?
[Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]
New contributor
add a comment |
Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.
Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?
[Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]
New contributor
add a comment |
Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.
Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?
[Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]
New contributor
Tell it your boss, simply "I observe the precept of not killing, not to encourage others and not to approve. It would be good if my person could take on tasks which do not involve such.", and simply abstain. Mental and future struggles from wrong doing are by far more hurtful and lasting then what ever hardship out of earn.
Not out of causes the Buddha told that aside of killing, involvment in business with meat or living beings, does not fit well for someone after long time happiness. And what ever gain, of cource needs to have it's sacrifies: why not letting go of what hurts?
[Note: this is not given for trade, exchange, stacks, but for release. For discussion and further question one is given to make use of this exit.]
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
New contributor
answered 6 hours ago
Samana JohannSamana Johann
292
292
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.
add a comment |
The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.
add a comment |
The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.
The Buddhist teachings do not exist for you to create suffering for yourself. Oysters are extremely primitive life forms. While they breathe oxygen, they are very close to plants. Oysters have a nervous system but not a brain. We practise non-killing as Buddhists so we cultivate a respect for life and cease to be violent people. If killing oysters (that don't suffer or don't have relatives or loved one's who suffer about them) is against your moral principles then find a new job. However, if you think deeply about what or who you have harmed, I don't think much will be found. Don't worry about it. Let it go. An oyster does not have a brother, sister, mother or father somewhere in the universe grieving about their lost relative oyster. The Buddha appeared to infer in SN 12.63 that lifeforms consuming other lifeforms is part of the cycle of life. As a "vegan", I imagine your views about food are more extreme than the average Buddhist. For example, the Buddha did not preach vegetarianism. The above said, personally, I would not like to kill oysters for a living.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
DhammadhatuDhammadhatu
24.9k11044
24.9k11044
add a comment |
add a comment |
According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).
However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.
If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.
Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.
Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)
Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)
Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
offense. (Pc 61)
Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
62)
add a comment |
According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).
However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.
If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.
Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.
Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)
Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)
Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
offense. (Pc 61)
Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
62)
add a comment |
According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).
However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.
If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.
Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.
Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)
Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)
Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
offense. (Pc 61)
Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
62)
According to the Bhikkhu Patimokkha (quoted below), which are rules for monks, killing a human is grounds for immediate and irreversible dismissal from the monastic order (parajika).
However, deliberately killing an animal is an offense that requires only confession (pacittiya) within the monastic order, usually with the intention not to do it again. It's not as severe as killing a human.
If possible, change jobs or avoid doing the task of killing oysters. This is because killing oysters involves generating the unwholesome deliberate intention of taking a life. It's against the five precepts and Right Livelihood.
Also, don't carry remorse in your mind, which is unwholesome and unskillful. Confess it i.e. acknowledge that it's wrong then let it go. Don't hold on to it.
Intentionally bringing about the death of a human being, even if it is
still a fetus — whether by killing the person, arranging for an
assassin to kill the person, inciting the person to die, or describing
the advantages of death — is a pārājika offense. (Pr 3)
Pouring water that one knows to contain living beings — or having it
poured — on grass or clay is a pācittiya offense. Pouring anything
that would kill the beings into such water — or having it poured — is
also a pācittiya offense. (Pc 20)
Deliberately killing an animal — or having it killed — is a pācittiya
offense. (Pc 61)
Using water, or getting others to use it, knowing that it contains
living beings that will die from that use, is a pācittiya offense. (Pc
62)
edited 49 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
ruben2020ruben2020
14.9k31242
14.9k31242
add a comment |
add a comment |
Nathan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nathan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nathan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nathan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Buddhism Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31247%2fmy-job-requires-me-to-shuck-oysters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown