Is “accuse people to be racist” grammatical?“x thinks it's people”--why “people” and not “a...

Performance and power usage for Raspberry Pi in the Stratosphere

How do I avoid the "chosen hero" feeling?

Limits of Rolle theorem

Buying a "Used" Router

Running away from a conflict

How to regain lost focus?

In the Lost in Space intro why was Dr. Smith actor listed as a special guest star?

Select all columns except geometry using virtual layers

Was Opportunity's last message to Earth "My battery is low and it's getting dark"?

Is "accuse people to be racist" grammatical?

Is there any danger of my neighbor having my wife's signature?

Would water spill from a bowl in a Bag of Holding?

Color of alien seas

What is an explicit bijection in combinatorics?

Why can't I set the 'prototype' of a function created using 'bind'?

Crack the bank account's password!

How can I differentiate duration vs starting time

Renting a 2CV in France

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

Is it possible to methodically find the total of ways to read a given phrase making a stack?

Do the speed limit reductions due to pollution also apply to electric cars in France?

How can I keep my gold safe from other PCs?

Neglect higher order derivatives in expression

How to write Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī?



Is “accuse people to be racist” grammatical?


“x thinks it's people”--why “people” and not “a human”?How to use preposition “to” , infinitive “to” and “---ing”?The + adjective = replacing nounQuestion about probable fixed use of “what do you do?” and “how do you do?”'Being' or 'To be'for Experience or condition“50% percent of people are unintelligent” or “50% of the people are unintelligent”?Not most people like him“These are people” vs “These are the people”Any other + singular nounsGrammatical emphasis













1















I am not sure if you can use the infinitive here.



I would rather say:




Accuse people of being racist.




The other question is if you can say:




Accuse people of being racists.



Accuse people to be racists.




I sometimes use words like "racist" as noun instead of adjective. Are both ok?










share|improve this question



























    1















    I am not sure if you can use the infinitive here.



    I would rather say:




    Accuse people of being racist.




    The other question is if you can say:




    Accuse people of being racists.



    Accuse people to be racists.




    I sometimes use words like "racist" as noun instead of adjective. Are both ok?










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      I am not sure if you can use the infinitive here.



      I would rather say:




      Accuse people of being racist.




      The other question is if you can say:




      Accuse people of being racists.



      Accuse people to be racists.




      I sometimes use words like "racist" as noun instead of adjective. Are both ok?










      share|improve this question














      I am not sure if you can use the infinitive here.



      I would rather say:




      Accuse people of being racist.




      The other question is if you can say:




      Accuse people of being racists.



      Accuse people to be racists.




      I sometimes use words like "racist" as noun instead of adjective. Are both ok?







      grammar idiomatic-language






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      repomonsterrepomonster

      58111




      58111






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          to is for purpose or a place.




          • I went to the field to play football.

          • I wanted to do the work.


          To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



          Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



          racist can be a noun or an adjective.






          share|improve this answer


























          • The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago











          • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago













          • yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago



















          2














          "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



          When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




          I accused him of being racist.




          or




          I accused him of racism.




          It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



          There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



          Examples:




          Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




          This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




          I consider him to be racist.




          This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.






          share|improve this answer


























          • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "481"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198011%2fis-accuse-people-to-be-racist-grammatical%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          to is for purpose or a place.




          • I went to the field to play football.

          • I wanted to do the work.


          To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



          Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



          racist can be a noun or an adjective.






          share|improve this answer


























          • The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago











          • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago













          • yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago
















          2














          to is for purpose or a place.




          • I went to the field to play football.

          • I wanted to do the work.


          To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



          Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



          racist can be a noun or an adjective.






          share|improve this answer


























          • The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago











          • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago













          • yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago














          2












          2








          2







          to is for purpose or a place.




          • I went to the field to play football.

          • I wanted to do the work.


          To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



          Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



          racist can be a noun or an adjective.






          share|improve this answer















          to is for purpose or a place.




          • I went to the field to play football.

          • I wanted to do the work.


          To accuse someone of being something is idiomatic.



          Therefore,to accuse people of being racist.



          racist can be a noun or an adjective.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 3 hours ago

























          answered 3 hours ago









          LambieLambie

          15.6k1432




          15.6k1432













          • The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago











          • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago













          • yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago



















          • The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago











          • I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago













          • yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

            – Astralbee
            2 hours ago

















          The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

          – Astralbee
          2 hours ago





          The reasoning in this answer seems wrong. You say "to" can be only for a purpose or a place and not a person - but what about "I asked John to be my best man"?

          – Astralbee
          2 hours ago













          I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

          – Lambie
          2 hours ago







          I asked John [purpose] to be my best man. I asked him for that purpose: being my best man.

          – Lambie
          2 hours ago















          yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

          – Astralbee
          2 hours ago





          yes but that doesn't answer the question. The OP doesn't know why "to" can't be used in place of "of" and you've said it is because it isn't a purpose or a place. That isn't the reason at all. What about simply "I went to John (no purpose yet) to to discuss our earlier football game"?

          – Astralbee
          2 hours ago













          2














          "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



          When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




          I accused him of being racist.




          or




          I accused him of racism.




          It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



          There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



          Examples:




          Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




          This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




          I consider him to be racist.




          This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.






          share|improve this answer


























          • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago
















          2














          "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



          When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




          I accused him of being racist.




          or




          I accused him of racism.




          It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



          There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



          Examples:




          Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




          This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




          I consider him to be racist.




          This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.






          share|improve this answer


























          • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago














          2












          2








          2







          "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



          When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




          I accused him of being racist.




          or




          I accused him of racism.




          It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



          There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



          Examples:




          Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




          This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




          I consider him to be racist.




          This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.






          share|improve this answer















          "To" is used to express motion or direction either to a literal place, person or thing, or toward a stated goal or a situation.



          When you accuse somebody you are calling them out for something they have done and that "crime" usually has a name. It is correct therefore to say:




          I accused him of being racist.




          or




          I accused him of racism.




          It would be incorrect to say "accuse... to" because there is no implied direction or motion towards something; you are labelling something they have already done.



          There are some other ways you could use "to" with an accusation, however - if you were indicating some kind of movement towards the act.



          Examples:




          Trump's xenophobic vision of America is inciting people to racism.




          This is correct because it suggests that people are moving towards being racist through the process of incitement.




          I consider him to be racist.




          This is correct because consideration is a process of thought so it is described as having motion or direction. Idiomatically this is pretty much the same as accusing someone of something because you are saying that you think they are something.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          AstralbeeAstralbee

          12k1045




          12k1045













          • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago



















          • toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

            – Lambie
            2 hours ago

















          toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

          – Lambie
          2 hours ago





          toward a stated goal= purpose, same thing.

          – Lambie
          2 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198011%2fis-accuse-people-to-be-racist-grammatical%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Discografia di Klaus Schulze Indice Album in studio | Album dal vivo | Singoli | Antologie | Colonne...

          Lupi Siderali Indice Storia | Organizzazione | La Tredicesima Compagnia | Aspetto | Membri Importanti...

          Armoriale delle famiglie italiane (Car) Indice Armi | Bibliografia | Menu di navigazioneBlasone...